You get tenure, what do I get?: Using art to interrogate a researcher’s dilemma

Gene L Fellner
{"title":"You get tenure, what do I get?: Using art to interrogate a researcher’s dilemma","authors":"Gene L Fellner","doi":"10.1386/VI.7.3.169_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"White researcher-advocates whose explorations are situated in schools serving predominantly African American students hope that their research will improve the academic possibilities for those students and reverse systemic injustice. While racial oppression continues as a central thread in the fabric of American educational institutions, white scholars continue to benefit from their research. Through arts-based methods, I explore this issue as it relates to my own research identity and question whether, despite my goals, I am complicit with hegemonic practices that oppress communities of colour within educational contexts. edUcAtIonAl reseArch And mY stAnce As A reseArcher Research authenticity (Guba and Lincoln 1989; Tobin 2006) demands that all participants in qualitative studies benefit from the research endeavour. In alignment with this concept, educational researchers need to see themselves not as disinterested observers but as advocates for the students they engage with. Nevertheless, those of us who work with black youth in the public schools reap many career benefits from our research, including tenure, awards and recognition, while the benefits of the research for the students we research with are uncertain. More doubtful still are the benefits to black youth KeYwords arts-based research anti-blackness special education whiteness disability research authenticity research ethics 01_VI 7.3_Fellner_167-181.indd 169 02/03/19 12:06 PM","PeriodicalId":41039,"journal":{"name":"Visual Inquiry-Learning & Teaching Art","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Inquiry-Learning & Teaching Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/VI.7.3.169_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

White researcher-advocates whose explorations are situated in schools serving predominantly African American students hope that their research will improve the academic possibilities for those students and reverse systemic injustice. While racial oppression continues as a central thread in the fabric of American educational institutions, white scholars continue to benefit from their research. Through arts-based methods, I explore this issue as it relates to my own research identity and question whether, despite my goals, I am complicit with hegemonic practices that oppress communities of colour within educational contexts. edUcAtIonAl reseArch And mY stAnce As A reseArcher Research authenticity (Guba and Lincoln 1989; Tobin 2006) demands that all participants in qualitative studies benefit from the research endeavour. In alignment with this concept, educational researchers need to see themselves not as disinterested observers but as advocates for the students they engage with. Nevertheless, those of us who work with black youth in the public schools reap many career benefits from our research, including tenure, awards and recognition, while the benefits of the research for the students we research with are uncertain. More doubtful still are the benefits to black youth KeYwords arts-based research anti-blackness special education whiteness disability research authenticity research ethics 01_VI 7.3_Fellner_167-181.indd 169 02/03/19 12:06 PM
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你得到了终身教职,我得到了什么?:用艺术来质问研究人员的困境
白人研究倡导者的探索位于以非洲裔美国学生为主的学校,他们希望他们的研究能提高这些学生的学术机会,扭转系统性的不公正。虽然种族压迫仍然是美国教育机构结构中的一条中心线索,但白人学者继续从他们的研究中受益。通过以艺术为基础的方法,我探索了这个问题,因为它与我自己的研究身份有关,并质疑,尽管我的目标是,我是否与在教育背景下压迫有色人种社区的霸权做法串通一通。研究真实性(Guba And Lincoln 1989;Tobin 2006)要求定性研究的所有参与者都能从研究努力中受益。为了与这一概念保持一致,教育研究人员需要将自己视为与他们接触的学生的倡导者,而不是无私的观察者。然而,我们这些在公立学校研究黑人青年的人从我们的研究中获得了许多职业上的好处,包括终身职位、奖励和认可,而研究对我们研究的学生的好处是不确定的。[关键词]艺术研究反黑人特殊教育白人残疾研究真实性研究伦理[j];add 169 02/03/19 12:06 PM
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Los Angeles 1984 Olympics: Using a logic model as a tool to understand soft power Becoming strategic spectators of organizational images: Olympic posters as antenarratives Time, space and art: The Olympic poster and the chronotope The 1972 Olympic Games: Utilizing posters for positive propaganda You be the judge: Teaching image-based advertising through a persuasive analysis of Olympic posters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1