Pesticides, crop choices and changes in well-being

IF 1.8 Q2 ECONOMICS Bio-based and Applied Economics Pub Date : 2022-08-30 DOI:10.36253/bae-10310
G. Gios, Stefano Farinelli, F. Kheiraoui, F. Martini, Jacopo Gabriele Orlando
{"title":"Pesticides, crop choices and changes in well-being","authors":"G. Gios, Stefano Farinelli, F. Kheiraoui, F. Martini, Jacopo Gabriele Orlando","doi":"10.36253/bae-10310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates how Pesticide Risk Indicators (PRIs) can be applied to help develop sound economic policies. We modified one of the numerous PRIs proposed over the years, the Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ), originally developed for the fruit industry, to consider co-formulants and adjuvants. The new formula includes three components representing the externalities of farm worker risk, consumer risk, and ecological risk. It also considers the potential externalities of the use of pesticides on residents living near the farms where these products are used. We applied the modified EIQ to two areas located in central Italy (the Chiana Valley in Tuscany and the Tiber and Upper Tiber Valleys in Tuscany/Umbria), surveying a sample of farms to determine the quantity and types of pesticides used on five crops: durum wheat, soft wheat, corn, tobacco, and olives. After calculating the impact quotient, we used data from a survey conducted in a different Italian region regarding the willingness to pay (WTP) for a pesticide-free environment and determined the WTP for even minimal changes in that quotient. Using those results, we simulated the changes in welfare (calculated as changes in willingness to pay) that would result from modifying the amount of land used for each crop. Our findings indicate that the proposed WTP indicator may have broad utility and that its application may lead to enhanced awareness of the consequences of pesticide use in farming. ","PeriodicalId":44385,"journal":{"name":"Bio-based and Applied Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bio-based and Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-10310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study investigates how Pesticide Risk Indicators (PRIs) can be applied to help develop sound economic policies. We modified one of the numerous PRIs proposed over the years, the Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ), originally developed for the fruit industry, to consider co-formulants and adjuvants. The new formula includes three components representing the externalities of farm worker risk, consumer risk, and ecological risk. It also considers the potential externalities of the use of pesticides on residents living near the farms where these products are used. We applied the modified EIQ to two areas located in central Italy (the Chiana Valley in Tuscany and the Tiber and Upper Tiber Valleys in Tuscany/Umbria), surveying a sample of farms to determine the quantity and types of pesticides used on five crops: durum wheat, soft wheat, corn, tobacco, and olives. After calculating the impact quotient, we used data from a survey conducted in a different Italian region regarding the willingness to pay (WTP) for a pesticide-free environment and determined the WTP for even minimal changes in that quotient. Using those results, we simulated the changes in welfare (calculated as changes in willingness to pay) that would result from modifying the amount of land used for each crop. Our findings indicate that the proposed WTP indicator may have broad utility and that its application may lead to enhanced awareness of the consequences of pesticide use in farming. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农药,作物选择和福祉的变化
本研究探讨了如何应用农药风险指标(pri)来帮助制定合理的经济政策。我们修改了多年来提出的众多PRIs之一,最初为水果行业开发的环境影响商数(EIQ),以考虑共配方剂和佐剂。新公式包括三个组成部分,分别代表农场工人风险、消费者风险和生态风险的外部性。它还考虑了在使用这些产品的农场附近居住的居民使用杀虫剂的潜在外部性。我们将改进后的EIQ应用于意大利中部的两个地区(托斯卡纳的奇亚纳山谷和托斯卡纳/翁布里亚的台伯河流域和上台伯河流域),调查了农场样本,以确定五种作物(硬粒小麦、软质小麦、玉米、烟草和橄榄)杀虫剂的数量和类型。在计算了影响商数之后,我们使用了在意大利不同地区进行的关于无农药环境的支付意愿(WTP)的调查数据,并确定了即使该商数变化最小的WTP。利用这些结果,我们模拟了由于改变每种作物的土地使用量而导致的福利变化(以支付意愿的变化计算)。我们的研究结果表明,提出的WTP指标可能具有广泛的效用,它的应用可能会提高人们对农业中农药使用后果的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Bio-based and Applied Economics (BAE) provides a forum for presentation and discussion of applied research in the field of bio-based sectors and related policies, informing evidence-based decision-making and policy-making. It intends to provide a scholarly source of theoretical and applied studies while remaining widely accessible for non-researchers. BAE seeks applied contributions on the economics of bio-based industries, such as agriculture, forestry, fishery and food, dealing with any related disciplines, such as resource and environmental economics, consumer studies, regional economics, innovation and development economics. Beside well-established fields of research related to these sectors, BAE aims in particular to explore cross-sectoral, recent and emerging themes characterizing the integrated management of biological resources, bio-based industries and sustainable development of rural areas. A special attention is also paid to the linkages between local and international dimensions.
期刊最新文献
New pathways for improved delivery of public goods from agriculture and forestry Towards a holistic approach to sustainable risk management in agriculture in the EU: a literature review Modelling technical efficiency of horticulture farming in Kosovo: An application of data envelopment analysis Reducing food-related economic loss to improve food security and cattle trade in the Sahel: the case of agropastoral systems in Senegal Incorporating expert knowledge in the estimate of farmers’ opportunity cost of supplying environmental services in rural Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1