A rationale for the reliability assessment of high integrity mechanical systems

A.R. Churchley
{"title":"A rationale for the reliability assessment of high integrity mechanical systems","authors":"A.R. Churchley","doi":"10.1016/0143-8174(87)90021-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purchaser of a high integrity mechanical system requires assurance that the manufacturer's claims will be met. Very elaborate, time-consuming and expensive studies could be envisaged to study the stressing, fatigue, wear and other failure mechanisms of every element and justify the design. A classical theory of stress-strength interference, whilst appearing useful in predicting failures, is seen to be less appropriate to the high integrity case. The dilemma that failures are impossible is contested. Finally, it is proposed that a practical, meaningful and economic analysis can be made using a blend of historical data, conventional reliability techniques such as fault tree analysis, physical inspection, experience and common sense.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101070,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"Pages 59-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-8174(87)90021-7","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143817487900217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The purchaser of a high integrity mechanical system requires assurance that the manufacturer's claims will be met. Very elaborate, time-consuming and expensive studies could be envisaged to study the stressing, fatigue, wear and other failure mechanisms of every element and justify the design. A classical theory of stress-strength interference, whilst appearing useful in predicting failures, is seen to be less appropriate to the high integrity case. The dilemma that failures are impossible is contested. Finally, it is proposed that a practical, meaningful and economic analysis can be made using a blend of historical data, conventional reliability techniques such as fault tree analysis, physical inspection, experience and common sense.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高完整性机械系统可靠性评估的基本原理
高完整性机械系统的购买者需要保证制造商的声明将得到满足。可以设想进行非常详细、耗时和昂贵的研究,以研究每个元件的应力、疲劳、磨损和其他破坏机制,并证明设计的合理性。经典的应力-强度干涉理论虽然在预测失效方面很有用,但对于高完整性的情况却不太适用。失败是不可能的这一困境是有争议的。最后,提出了一种实用、有意义和经济的分析方法,可以将历史数据、传统的可靠性技术(如故障树分析、物理检查、经验和常识)结合起来进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
APPENDIX C: OPTIMUM ARRANGEMENT OF COMPONENTS IN CONSECUTIVE‐2‐OUT‐OF‐ N : F SYSTEMS APPENDIX A: GAMMA TABLE APPENDIX H: COMPUTER LISTING OF THE NEWTON–RAPHSON METHOD APPENDIX B: COMPUTER PROGRAM TO CALCULATE THE RELIABILITY OF A CONSECUTIVE‐ k ‐OUT‐OF‐ n : F SYSTEM SYSTEM RELIABILITY EVALUATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1