What's After Good?: The Burden of Post-Incarceration Life

Quintin Williams, Cesraéa Rumpf
{"title":"What's After Good?: The Burden of Post-Incarceration Life","authors":"Quintin Williams, Cesraéa Rumpf","doi":"10.21428/88de04a1.d5d7d868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current era of mass incarceration, an increasing number of people face the challenge of transitioning from prison to society. Researchers of post-incarceration life have produced a detailed account of the collateral consequences of incarceration, noting the numerous barriers people must overcome as they try to return to society. In this paper, we show how stigma continues to be a structuring force in the lives of the formerly incarcerated. We develop the concept of the burden of post-incarceration life, meaning the structural constraints formerly incarcerated people face and the constant work they undertake to demonstrate and attempt to receive recognition for their rehabilitation. We argue that this burden is a critical though understudied aspect of life after prison. To develop this argument, we draw upon ethnographic and qualitative interview data from two distinct research projects with formerly incarcerated men and women in Chicago and highlight three interrelated themes that emerged from our data: judgment, exploitation, and competing demands. By centering burden in our analysis, we conclude that a focus on overcoming barriers may obfuscate the ongoing challenges formerly incarcerated people face.","PeriodicalId":90621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of qualitative criminal justice & criminology : JQCJC","volume":"49 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of qualitative criminal justice & criminology : JQCJC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.d5d7d868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the current era of mass incarceration, an increasing number of people face the challenge of transitioning from prison to society. Researchers of post-incarceration life have produced a detailed account of the collateral consequences of incarceration, noting the numerous barriers people must overcome as they try to return to society. In this paper, we show how stigma continues to be a structuring force in the lives of the formerly incarcerated. We develop the concept of the burden of post-incarceration life, meaning the structural constraints formerly incarcerated people face and the constant work they undertake to demonstrate and attempt to receive recognition for their rehabilitation. We argue that this burden is a critical though understudied aspect of life after prison. To develop this argument, we draw upon ethnographic and qualitative interview data from two distinct research projects with formerly incarcerated men and women in Chicago and highlight three interrelated themes that emerged from our data: judgment, exploitation, and competing demands. By centering burden in our analysis, we conclude that a focus on overcoming barriers may obfuscate the ongoing challenges formerly incarcerated people face.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
好的之后是什么?:出狱后生活的负担
在当前大规模监禁的时代,越来越多的人面临着从监狱向社会过渡的挑战。研究入狱后生活的研究人员详细描述了监禁的附带后果,指出了人们在试图重返社会时必须克服的众多障碍。在本文中,我们展示了耻辱如何继续成为前被监禁者生活中的结构性力量。我们发展了监禁后生活负担的概念,这意味着以前被监禁的人面临的结构性限制,以及他们承担的持续工作,以证明并试图获得对他们的康复的认可。我们认为,这种负担是出狱后生活的一个关键方面,尽管研究不足。为了发展这一论点,我们从两个不同的研究项目中借鉴了人种学和定性访谈数据,这些研究项目涉及芝加哥以前被监禁的男性和女性,并强调了从我们的数据中出现的三个相互关联的主题:判断、剥削和竞争需求。通过将负担作为我们分析的中心,我们得出结论,对克服障碍的关注可能会混淆以前被监禁的人面临的持续挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Snitch. Snake. Mole. Books.: Examining Responses to “Insider/Outsider” Researchers in Corrections “Leave Your Pain Here:” an Illustration of Therapeutic Jurisprudence Through the Remarks of Judge Rosemarie Aquilina From The State of Michigan versus Lawrence Nassar White Supremacy and the Future of Liberal Democracy–the Case of the Nordic Resistance Movement Using a Trauma-Informed Practice Framework to Examine How South Australian Judges Respond to Trauma in the Lives of Aboriginal Defendants Social Supports for Community Corrections Clients: Risk Factors or Protective Factors?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1