Relevant Aspects of Drug Genetic Toxicology

A. Durnev, A. Zhanataev
{"title":"Relevant Aspects of Drug Genetic Toxicology","authors":"A. Durnev, A. Zhanataev","doi":"10.30895/1991-2919-2022-12-1-90-109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genotoxic lesions are not only a cause of genetic pathologies and cancer, but also the most common and significant factor of the etiopathology of cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders, reproductive losses, infertility, and aging. This requires careful monitoring of the use of potential genotoxicants including medicinal products (MPs), which are a group of compounds intentionally and routinely used by humans. Genotoxicity assesment is highly essential in preclinical drug safety studies. The aim of the study was to analyse the current situation and reveal possible ways of addressing methodological and regulatory issues in genotoxicology to enable proper conduction of drug safety preclinical studies. The article summarises basic concepts of the modern genetic toxicology development and highlights the history of research aimed at identifying mutagenic, clastogenic, and aneugenic effects. The authors analyse regulatory aspects of genotoxicological studies of MPs and consider issues of improving the strategy for genotoxicity testing. The paper gives information about the genotoxicity tests approved for MPs, recommendations for interchangeability of tests in relation to particular study characteristics. The authors carried out a comparative analysis of the tests’ pros and cons with an emphasis that the study of each MP is a separate scientific task. They discuss interpretation of results and prediction of MP carcinogenic potential in genotoxicological studies. Recommendations are given for the optimisation of the MP genotoxicity assessment strategy, considering its partial integration into general toxicity studies. The article stresses the urgent need to develop registration methods for genotoxic events in germ cells, assesses the prospects of new tests, and reviews new trends in drug genotoxicology fundamental research.","PeriodicalId":22286,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2022-12-1-90-109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Genotoxic lesions are not only a cause of genetic pathologies and cancer, but also the most common and significant factor of the etiopathology of cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders, reproductive losses, infertility, and aging. This requires careful monitoring of the use of potential genotoxicants including medicinal products (MPs), which are a group of compounds intentionally and routinely used by humans. Genotoxicity assesment is highly essential in preclinical drug safety studies. The aim of the study was to analyse the current situation and reveal possible ways of addressing methodological and regulatory issues in genotoxicology to enable proper conduction of drug safety preclinical studies. The article summarises basic concepts of the modern genetic toxicology development and highlights the history of research aimed at identifying mutagenic, clastogenic, and aneugenic effects. The authors analyse regulatory aspects of genotoxicological studies of MPs and consider issues of improving the strategy for genotoxicity testing. The paper gives information about the genotoxicity tests approved for MPs, recommendations for interchangeability of tests in relation to particular study characteristics. The authors carried out a comparative analysis of the tests’ pros and cons with an emphasis that the study of each MP is a separate scientific task. They discuss interpretation of results and prediction of MP carcinogenic potential in genotoxicological studies. Recommendations are given for the optimisation of the MP genotoxicity assessment strategy, considering its partial integration into general toxicity studies. The article stresses the urgent need to develop registration methods for genotoxic events in germ cells, assesses the prospects of new tests, and reviews new trends in drug genotoxicology fundamental research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物遗传毒理学的相关方面
基因毒性病变不仅是遗传病理和癌症的原因,也是心血管和神经退行性疾病、生殖丧失、不孕和衰老的最常见和最重要的病因。这需要仔细监测潜在基因毒物的使用,包括医药产品(MPs),这是人类有意和常规使用的一组化合物。遗传毒性评估在临床前药物安全性研究中非常重要。本研究的目的是分析目前的情况,并揭示解决基因毒理学方法和监管问题的可能方法,以便正确开展药物安全性临床前研究。本文概述了现代遗传毒理学发展的基本概念,重点介绍了旨在确定致突变、致裂和非优生效应的研究历史。作者分析了MPs基因毒理学研究的监管方面,并考虑了改进遗传毒性测试策略的问题。本文提供了关于批准的MPs遗传毒性试验的信息,以及与特定研究特征相关的试验互换性的建议。作者对这些测试的优缺点进行了比较分析,强调对每一种MP的研究都是一项单独的科学任务。他们讨论了基因毒理学研究结果的解释和MP致癌潜力的预测。考虑到其部分整合到一般毒性研究中,提出了优化MP遗传毒性评估策略的建议。本文强调了开发生殖细胞遗传毒性事件登记方法的迫切需要,评估了新检测方法的前景,并综述了药物遗传毒理学基础研究的新趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Medicinal Products for Human Use Authorised in the Russian Federation Diffusion-Ordered NMR Spectroscopy Application for Analysis of Polysaccharides Determination of Heavy Metals, Arsenic, and Aluminum Content in Pumpkin Seed Herbal Substance and Native Products, by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry The Use of Spectroscopic Methods for Structural Elucidation of Individual Secondary Metabolites Isolated from the Aerial Parts of Corydalis bracteata NMR as Used in the Russian and Foreign Pharmacopoeias for Quality Control of Medicinal Products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1