The Effects of Herding on Betas and Idiosyncratic Risk

IF 1.7 3区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Behavioral Finance Pub Date : 2021-09-13 DOI:10.1080/15427560.2021.1975713
P. Messis, A. Alexandridis, A. Zapranis
{"title":"The Effects of Herding on Betas and Idiosyncratic Risk","authors":"P. Messis, A. Alexandridis, A. Zapranis","doi":"10.1080/15427560.2021.1975713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper investigates the consequences of herding on systematic and idiosyncratic risk for stocks traded on S&P 500. Herding behavior is measured through a state-space model. Using monthly data from 1999 to 2017, different periods of herding and adverse herding are present. Evidence shows that the state space model identifies the significant herding effects on both risk measures for specific portfolios. Our findings validate the expected implications of herding on betas but not of adverse herding. In addition, the low-beta anomaly is not confirmed on our beta-based portfolios. On the other hand, we confirm the risk-return relationship. We attribute this evidence to overpriced values of high beta assets as well as to the effects of adverse herding on the systematic and idiosyncratic risk. Finally, we also show that the herding level could serve as a systematic driver of returns improving the portfolio performance of traditional ‘anomaly’ based strategies.","PeriodicalId":47016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Finance","volume":"88 10 1","pages":"131 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2021.1975713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the consequences of herding on systematic and idiosyncratic risk for stocks traded on S&P 500. Herding behavior is measured through a state-space model. Using monthly data from 1999 to 2017, different periods of herding and adverse herding are present. Evidence shows that the state space model identifies the significant herding effects on both risk measures for specific portfolios. Our findings validate the expected implications of herding on betas but not of adverse herding. In addition, the low-beta anomaly is not confirmed on our beta-based portfolios. On the other hand, we confirm the risk-return relationship. We attribute this evidence to overpriced values of high beta assets as well as to the effects of adverse herding on the systematic and idiosyncratic risk. Finally, we also show that the herding level could serve as a systematic driver of returns improving the portfolio performance of traditional ‘anomaly’ based strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放牧对β和特殊风险的影响
摘要本文研究了羊群效应对标普500指数成份股系统风险和特质风险的影响。羊群行为是通过状态空间模型来衡量的。利用1999 - 2017年的月度数据,存在不同时期的放牧和不利放牧。有证据表明,状态空间模型识别了特定投资组合的两种风险度量的显著羊群效应。我们的研究结果证实了预期的放牧对β的影响,而不是不利的放牧。此外,在我们基于贝塔的投资组合中,低贝塔异常并未得到证实。另一方面,我们确认了风险收益关系。我们将这一证据归因于高贝塔资产的高估价值以及不利羊群对系统和特殊风险的影响。最后,我们还表明,羊群水平可以作为回报的系统驱动因素,改善传统的基于“异常”的投资组合绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: In Journal of Behavioral Finance , leaders in many fields are brought together to address the implications of current work on individual and group emotion, cognition, and action for the behavior of investment markets. They include specialists in personality, social, and clinical psychology; psychiatry; organizational behavior; accounting; marketing; sociology; anthropology; behavioral economics; finance; and the multidisciplinary study of judgment and decision making. The journal will foster debate among groups who have keen insights into the behavioral patterns of markets but have not historically published in the more traditional financial and economic journals. Further, it will stimulate new interdisciplinary research and theory that will build a body of knowledge about the psychological influences on investment market fluctuations. The most obvious benefit will be a new understanding of investment markets that can greatly improve investment decision making. Another benefit will be the opportunity for behavioral scientists to expand the scope of their studies via the use of the enormous databases that document behavior in investment markets.
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Social Media Emotions: Evidence from the Kodak Manic Episode Business Cycle Variations in Manager and Investor Sentiment Indices The Effect of Analysts’ Reports on Stock Liquidity: The Interaction of Ratings and Qualitative Indicators Buy Now, Pay Later Loans, Social Norms, and Consumer Indebtedness Limited or Biased: Modeling Subrational Human Investors in Financial Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1