Comparative Effects of Recreational and Medical Marijuana Laws on Drug Use among Adults and Adolescents

Alex Hollingsworth, Coady Wing, Ashley C Bradford
{"title":"Comparative Effects of Recreational and Medical Marijuana Laws on Drug Use among Adults and Adolescents","authors":"Alex Hollingsworth, Coady Wing, Ashley C Bradford","doi":"10.1086/721267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thirty-four states have medical marijuana laws, and 10 states have recreational marijuana laws. Little research compares how these two types of laws affect drug consumption in the general population or in particular age groups. Using a difference-in-differences strategy, we find that recreational laws increase past-year marijuana use by 25 percent among adults and by 10 percent among adolescents. In contrast, medical laws increase adult use by only 5 percent and have a negligible effect on adolescent use. We also find that recreational marijuana dispensaries are an important driver of the increase in marijuana use for adults 26 and older. Our results suggest that medical laws succeed in mitigating recreational (nonmedical) use, that recreational laws produce large increases in marijuana use in the general population, and that underage marijuana use may be an important problem with existing implementations of recreational marijuana laws.","PeriodicalId":22657,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law and Economics","volume":"88 4 1","pages":"515 - 554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Thirty-four states have medical marijuana laws, and 10 states have recreational marijuana laws. Little research compares how these two types of laws affect drug consumption in the general population or in particular age groups. Using a difference-in-differences strategy, we find that recreational laws increase past-year marijuana use by 25 percent among adults and by 10 percent among adolescents. In contrast, medical laws increase adult use by only 5 percent and have a negligible effect on adolescent use. We also find that recreational marijuana dispensaries are an important driver of the increase in marijuana use for adults 26 and older. Our results suggest that medical laws succeed in mitigating recreational (nonmedical) use, that recreational laws produce large increases in marijuana use in the general population, and that underage marijuana use may be an important problem with existing implementations of recreational marijuana laws.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
娱乐性和医用大麻法律对成人和青少年吸毒的比较影响
34个州有医用大麻法,10个州有娱乐性大麻法。很少有研究比较这两种类型的法律如何影响普通人群或特定年龄组的毒品消费。使用差异中的差异策略,我们发现娱乐性法律使过去一年的大麻使用量在成年人中增加了25%,在青少年中增加了10%。相比之下,医疗法律只增加了5%的成人使用,对青少年使用的影响可以忽略不计。我们还发现,娱乐性大麻药房是26岁及以上成年人大麻使用量增加的重要驱动因素。我们的研究结果表明,医疗法律成功地减少了娱乐(非医疗)使用,娱乐法律导致普通人群中大麻使用的大幅增加,未成年人使用大麻可能是现有娱乐大麻法律实施的一个重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Lion’s Share: Evidence from Federal Contracts on the Value of Political Connections Loans to Chapter 11 Firms: Contract Design, Repayment Risk, and Pricing Dynamic Decision-Making under Rolling Admissions: Evidence from US Law School Applications Does Voluntary Financial Disclosure Matter? The Case of Fairness Opinions in Mergers and Acquisitions Partisan Gerrymandering and Turnout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1