The Thin Border between Life and Death

E. Değirmenci, O. Tutar, Abdullah Gulbagci, I. Ikizceli, C. Aktaş
{"title":"The Thin Border between Life and Death","authors":"E. Değirmenci, O. Tutar, Abdullah Gulbagci, I. Ikizceli, C. Aktaş","doi":"10.5152/jaem.2015.94834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aimed to represent the case of a gunshot injury which was so close to the center that it could have affected the vital functions. Here you will find the imaging studies regarding this case. A 17-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with the claim of a gunshot injury. It was observed that the patient was conscious, cooperative, and oriented. During examination, a defect, consistent with a 5 × 5 mm bullet inlet, was seen in the left zygomatic region as an extracranial finding. Minimal tenderness was elicited with palpation on left zygomatic region and his Glascow coma score was 15/15. His pupils were isocoric, light reflex was bilaterally positive, eye movements and vision were normal, diplopia was not present, and otorrhea and rhinorea were absent. Cranial nerves and motor function examinations were intact. When the patient was admitted to the hospital, his vital signs were as follows: blood pressure, 100/60; pulse, 80/min; inspiration rate, 22/min; temperature, 26.6°C; and oxygen saturation, 97%. Laboratory revealed no significant pathological findings. Cranial and maxillofacial computed tomography revealed that the bullet inlet was located anteriorly in the left maxillary sinus, the bullet was located in the left suboccipital condyle, and the lateral wall was destroyed (Figure 1, 2a, b). The patient was referred to the neurology clinic. His neurological examination revealed no sign of any deficit. Radiological imaging revealed that the bullet was located in a place which could not be easily reached with surgical instruments; therefore, a conservative approach was thought to be suitable for this case (Figure 3a-c, 4). Surgery for a gunshot head injury is intended to achieveof revitalized in the entrance and exit wounds, evacuation of all significant mass lesions, hemostasis, and meticulous dural and scalp closure (1). The indication for surgery to remove a bullet is controversial because presence of retained bullets or bone fragments do not increase intracranial infection rate and removal of the same to prevent infection is unnecessary (1, 2). However, the common complications of retained intracranial foreign bodies are abscess formation, cerebrospinal fluid fistulas, post-traumatic epilepsy, hematomas, and infection (3). The patient was observed for 24 h in our emergency clinic and then discharged. He was instructed to come back for follow-up visits for 3 months. During the follow-up visits, no pathology was observed.","PeriodicalId":14780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports","volume":"16 1","pages":"160-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/jaem.2015.94834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed to represent the case of a gunshot injury which was so close to the center that it could have affected the vital functions. Here you will find the imaging studies regarding this case. A 17-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with the claim of a gunshot injury. It was observed that the patient was conscious, cooperative, and oriented. During examination, a defect, consistent with a 5 × 5 mm bullet inlet, was seen in the left zygomatic region as an extracranial finding. Minimal tenderness was elicited with palpation on left zygomatic region and his Glascow coma score was 15/15. His pupils were isocoric, light reflex was bilaterally positive, eye movements and vision were normal, diplopia was not present, and otorrhea and rhinorea were absent. Cranial nerves and motor function examinations were intact. When the patient was admitted to the hospital, his vital signs were as follows: blood pressure, 100/60; pulse, 80/min; inspiration rate, 22/min; temperature, 26.6°C; and oxygen saturation, 97%. Laboratory revealed no significant pathological findings. Cranial and maxillofacial computed tomography revealed that the bullet inlet was located anteriorly in the left maxillary sinus, the bullet was located in the left suboccipital condyle, and the lateral wall was destroyed (Figure 1, 2a, b). The patient was referred to the neurology clinic. His neurological examination revealed no sign of any deficit. Radiological imaging revealed that the bullet was located in a place which could not be easily reached with surgical instruments; therefore, a conservative approach was thought to be suitable for this case (Figure 3a-c, 4). Surgery for a gunshot head injury is intended to achieveof revitalized in the entrance and exit wounds, evacuation of all significant mass lesions, hemostasis, and meticulous dural and scalp closure (1). The indication for surgery to remove a bullet is controversial because presence of retained bullets or bone fragments do not increase intracranial infection rate and removal of the same to prevent infection is unnecessary (1, 2). However, the common complications of retained intracranial foreign bodies are abscess formation, cerebrospinal fluid fistulas, post-traumatic epilepsy, hematomas, and infection (3). The patient was observed for 24 h in our emergency clinic and then discharged. He was instructed to come back for follow-up visits for 3 months. During the follow-up visits, no pathology was observed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生与死之间的界限
我们的目标是代表一个枪伤的案例,因为距离中心太近,可能会影响到重要的功能。在这里,您可以找到有关本病例的影像学研究。一名17岁男性病人到急诊科,声称受到枪伤。观察到患者意识清醒,合作,有方向感。在检查过程中,在左侧颧骨区发现一个与5 × 5 mm子弹入口一致的缺陷,作为颅外发现。左侧颧区触诊轻微压痛,Glascow昏迷评分15/15。瞳孔等宽,双侧光反射阳性,眼球运动和视力正常,无复视,无耳漏和鼻漏。脑神经及运动功能检查未见异常。患者入院时生命体征如下:血压100/60;脉冲,80 /分钟;吸气率22/min;温度、26.6°C;氧饱和度,97%。实验室未见明显病理改变。颅颌面计算机断层扫描显示子弹入口位于左侧上颌窦前部,子弹位于左侧枕下髁,侧壁被破坏(图1,2a, b)。患者被转至神经内科诊所。他的神经学检查没有发现任何缺陷。放射成像显示,子弹位于手术器械难以触及的地方;因此,保守入路被认为适用于本病例(图3a-c, 4)。对头部枪伤的手术旨在实现入口和出口伤口的恢复,清除所有重要的肿块病变,止血,以及严格的硬脑膜和头皮闭合(1)。手术取出子弹的指征是有争议的,因为残留的子弹或骨碎片不会增加颅内感染率,为了防止感染而取出子弹是不必要的(1,2)。然而,残留的颅内异物的常见并发症是脓肿形成、脑脊液瘘管、创伤后癫痫、血肿、患者于我院急诊观察24 h后出院。他被要求回来随访3个月。随访期间未见病理变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intramuscular Hydatid Cyst: Report of an Unusual Case Fat Embolism Syndrome after Lower Extremity Fracture A Rare Case of Isolated Auricular Injury Caused by a Tree Branch During a Traffic Accident Aneurysmal Bone Cyst of Rib: A Report of a Rare Case Could Propafenone hydrochloride Cause Visual Hallucination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1