P2P Loan Acceptance and Default Prediction with Artificial Intelligence

J. Turiel, T. Aste
{"title":"P2P Loan Acceptance and Default Prediction with Artificial Intelligence","authors":"J. Turiel, T. Aste","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3417122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine algorithms, together with Linear and Non-Linear Deep Neural Networks, are applied to lending data in order to replicate lender acceptance of loans and predict the likelihood of default of issued loans. A two phase model is proposed; the first phase predicts loan rejection, while the second one predicts default risk for approved loans. Logistic Regression was found to be the best performer for the first phase, with test set recall macro score of $77.4 \\%$. Deep Neural Networks were applied to the second phase only, were they achieved best performance, with validation set recall score of $72 \\%$, for defaults. This shows that AI can improve current credit risk models reducing the default risk of issued loans by as much as $70 \\%$. The models were also applied to loans taken for small businesses alone. The first phase of the model performs significantly better when trained on the whole dataset. Instead, the second phase performs significantly better when trained on the small business subset. This suggests a potential discrepancy between how these loans are screened and how they should be analysed in terms of default prediction.","PeriodicalId":11881,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship & Finance eJournal","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship & Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3417122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine algorithms, together with Linear and Non-Linear Deep Neural Networks, are applied to lending data in order to replicate lender acceptance of loans and predict the likelihood of default of issued loans. A two phase model is proposed; the first phase predicts loan rejection, while the second one predicts default risk for approved loans. Logistic Regression was found to be the best performer for the first phase, with test set recall macro score of $77.4 \%$. Deep Neural Networks were applied to the second phase only, were they achieved best performance, with validation set recall score of $72 \%$, for defaults. This shows that AI can improve current credit risk models reducing the default risk of issued loans by as much as $70 \%$. The models were also applied to loans taken for small businesses alone. The first phase of the model performs significantly better when trained on the whole dataset. Instead, the second phase performs significantly better when trained on the small business subset. This suggests a potential discrepancy between how these loans are screened and how they should be analysed in terms of default prediction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工智能的P2P贷款受理与违约预测
逻辑回归和支持向量机算法以及线性和非线性深度神经网络应用于贷款数据,以复制贷款人对贷款的接受程度,并预测已发行贷款违约的可能性。提出了一种两阶段模型;第一阶段预测贷款拒绝,第二阶段预测已批准贷款的违约风险。逻辑回归被发现是第一阶段表现最好的,测试集召回宏观得分为77.4%。深度神经网络仅应用于第二阶段,如果它们达到最佳性能,默认情况下验证集召回分数为72 %。这表明,人工智能可以改进当前的信用风险模型,将已发行贷款的违约风险降低高达70%。这些模型也适用于仅针对小企业的贷款。当对整个数据集进行训练时,模型的第一阶段表现明显更好。相反,当在小型企业子集上进行训练时,第二阶段的表现要好得多。这表明,在筛选这些贷款的方式与如何从违约预测的角度分析这些贷款之间,可能存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corporate Tax Cuts for Small Firms: What Do Firms Do? Are Private Equity Funds Superior Real Estate Investors? Evidence from the Hotel Industry The effect of economic policy uncertainty on start-up financing and success: Evidence from the European start-up market The perfect bail-in: Financing without banks using Peer-To-Peer Lending Regulatory Risk Perception and Small Business Lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1