{"title":"The Brown Shoe Case","authors":"John L. Peterman","doi":"10.1086/466807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN 1956, Brown Shoe Co. purchased G. R. Kinney. Both firms were engaged in the production and distribution of shoes. The acquisition was challenged by the Department of Justice and ultimately found to violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The Department of Justice argued that the merger was a \"classic example in both its vertical and horizontal aspects of the type of merger Section 7 . . .was intended to prevent.\"' The courts","PeriodicalId":22657,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law and Economics","volume":"116 1","pages":"81 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/466807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
IN 1956, Brown Shoe Co. purchased G. R. Kinney. Both firms were engaged in the production and distribution of shoes. The acquisition was challenged by the Department of Justice and ultimately found to violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act. The Department of Justice argued that the merger was a "classic example in both its vertical and horizontal aspects of the type of merger Section 7 . . .was intended to prevent."' The courts
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
