The Think Family Social Work Assessment: outcomes of a family-focused initiative using The Family Model

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Advances in Mental Health Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1080/18387357.2020.1825969
K. McVeigh
{"title":"The Think Family Social Work Assessment: outcomes of a family-focused initiative using The Family Model","authors":"K. McVeigh","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2020.1825969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: A family focused initiative, based on Falkov's Family Model (2012), was piloted across mental health teams in Northern Ireland. The initiative was called the Think Family Social Work Assessment and consisted of three elements: a family conversation, assessment and review. This study aimed to investigate the benefits of this initiative for family recovery from the perspective of family members, social workers and other professionals. Method: A self-report questionnaire was constructed by the Health and Social Care Board based on the six domains of The Family Model. This questionnaire was used to collate feedback at pre and post engagement stages in the initiative from social workers in adult mental health services in five Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland. Questionnaires were also completed by parents, adult siblings, carers, children and other involved professionals at the post stage. Results: Findings suggest a positive shift in perceptions by social workers, family members and involved professionals. Key insights included: improved communication between family members and professionals; better understanding of the impact of mental health on the family; and the use of a strengths-based approach to identify professional and family perspectives on resources, needs and concerns. Professionals reported an improvement in collaboration between services. Discussion: This evaluation of the Think Family Social Work Assessment demonstrated preliminary positive outcomes. The assessment component of the Think Family Social Work Assessment contributed to needs identification and fuller understanding of each families' strengths and vulnerabilities. The findings support a strategic approach across health and social care.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"9 1","pages":"261 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2020.1825969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: A family focused initiative, based on Falkov's Family Model (2012), was piloted across mental health teams in Northern Ireland. The initiative was called the Think Family Social Work Assessment and consisted of three elements: a family conversation, assessment and review. This study aimed to investigate the benefits of this initiative for family recovery from the perspective of family members, social workers and other professionals. Method: A self-report questionnaire was constructed by the Health and Social Care Board based on the six domains of The Family Model. This questionnaire was used to collate feedback at pre and post engagement stages in the initiative from social workers in adult mental health services in five Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern Ireland. Questionnaires were also completed by parents, adult siblings, carers, children and other involved professionals at the post stage. Results: Findings suggest a positive shift in perceptions by social workers, family members and involved professionals. Key insights included: improved communication between family members and professionals; better understanding of the impact of mental health on the family; and the use of a strengths-based approach to identify professional and family perspectives on resources, needs and concerns. Professionals reported an improvement in collaboration between services. Discussion: This evaluation of the Think Family Social Work Assessment demonstrated preliminary positive outcomes. The assessment component of the Think Family Social Work Assessment contributed to needs identification and fuller understanding of each families' strengths and vulnerabilities. The findings support a strategic approach across health and social care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
思考家庭社会工作评估:使用家庭模式的以家庭为中心的倡议的结果
摘要目的:一项以家庭为重点的倡议,基于Falkov的家庭模型(2012),在北爱尔兰的精神卫生团队中进行了试点。这项倡议被称为“思考家庭社会工作评估”,包括三个要素:家庭对话、评估和审查。本研究旨在从家庭成员、社工及其他专业人士的角度,探讨这项计划对家庭复原的益处。方法:以家庭模式的六个领域为基础,由卫生和社会保健委员会编制自我报告问卷。该问卷用于整理北爱尔兰五个卫生和社会保健信托基金成人心理健康服务社会工作者在参与该倡议前后阶段的反馈。调查问卷也由父母、成年兄弟姐妹、照顾者、孩子和其他后期相关专业人员完成。结果:调查结果表明,社会工作者、家庭成员和相关专业人员的观念发生了积极的转变。主要见解包括:改善家庭成员与专业人士之间的沟通;更好地了解心理健康对家庭的影响;并采用基于优势的方法,确定专业和家庭对资源、需求和关切的看法。专业人员报告说,各服务部门之间的协作有所改善。讨论:对Think Family社会工作评估的评估显示了初步的积极成果。思考家庭社会工作评估的评估部分有助于确定需求并更充分地了解每个家庭的长处和弱点。研究结果支持在卫生和社会保健领域采取战略方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Patients’ and staff’s experiences of Well-Track physical activity and sleep quality intervention in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) service Assessment of the implementation of psychological first aid training: adaptation and validation of determinants of the implementation behavior questionnaire Investigating factors that impact on the uptake of Mental Health First Aid Australia’s Conversations About Gambling course: a qualitative study engaging stakeholder perspectives The relationship between mental health and stress: the moderating role of satisfaction with friendships Mental Health First Aid training for China: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1