The clinical and biomarker approach to predict sepsis mortality in pediatric patients

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS Paediatrica Indonesiana Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.14238/pi63.1.2023.37-44
I. Yuniar, M. Karyanti, N. Kurniati, Desti Handayani
{"title":"The clinical and biomarker approach to predict sepsis mortality in pediatric patients","authors":"I. Yuniar, M. Karyanti, N. Kurniati, Desti Handayani","doi":"10.14238/pi63.1.2023.37-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Sepsis is a leading cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of sepsis mortality in Indonesia varies between 22.5 to 52%. \nObjective To identify the clinical criteria for predicting sepsis mortality and evaluate the performance of the PELOD-2 score. \nMethods This retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients admitted to the emergency department or pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, from January 2015 to May 2020. Demographic characteristics (age and sex), clinical manifestations [nutritional status, presence of shock, need for intubation, source of infection, inotrope use, mean arterial pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score], laboratory [leukocyte, platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate profile], PELOD-2 score, and mortality data were recorded as outcomes. \nResults We analyzed data from 241 sepsis subjects. The overall mortality rate was 65%. Shock [OR 3.2 (95%CI 1.80 to -5.55, P<0.001)], GCS <9 [OR 2.4 (95%CI 1.30 to 4.23, P=0.005)],  inotrope use [OR 3.1 (95%CI 1.74 to 5.5, P<0.001)], CRP >33.5 mg/L [OR 2.5 (95%CI 1.14  to 5.35, P=0.02)], and lactate level >2.85 [OR 2.1 (95%CI 1.02 to 4.56, P=0.04)] were considered significant predictors of mortality. A PELOD-2 cut-off score of >8 had optimal sensitivity (81.2%) and specificity (72.9%) to predict mortality, with an OR of 11.6 (95%CI 5.72 to 23.5, P<0.001). \nConclusion Shock, GCS score, inotrope use, CRP, and lactate level can serve as clinical biomarkers to predict mortality in pediatric sepsis. A PELOD-2 score of >8 can predict mortality with reasonably good sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":19660,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrica Indonesiana","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14238/pi63.1.2023.37-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Sepsis is a leading cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of sepsis mortality in Indonesia varies between 22.5 to 52%. Objective To identify the clinical criteria for predicting sepsis mortality and evaluate the performance of the PELOD-2 score. Methods This retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients admitted to the emergency department or pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia, from January 2015 to May 2020. Demographic characteristics (age and sex), clinical manifestations [nutritional status, presence of shock, need for intubation, source of infection, inotrope use, mean arterial pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score], laboratory [leukocyte, platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and lactate profile], PELOD-2 score, and mortality data were recorded as outcomes. Results We analyzed data from 241 sepsis subjects. The overall mortality rate was 65%. Shock [OR 3.2 (95%CI 1.80 to -5.55, P<0.001)], GCS <9 [OR 2.4 (95%CI 1.30 to 4.23, P=0.005)],  inotrope use [OR 3.1 (95%CI 1.74 to 5.5, P<0.001)], CRP >33.5 mg/L [OR 2.5 (95%CI 1.14  to 5.35, P=0.02)], and lactate level >2.85 [OR 2.1 (95%CI 1.02 to 4.56, P=0.04)] were considered significant predictors of mortality. A PELOD-2 cut-off score of >8 had optimal sensitivity (81.2%) and specificity (72.9%) to predict mortality, with an OR of 11.6 (95%CI 5.72 to 23.5, P<0.001). Conclusion Shock, GCS score, inotrope use, CRP, and lactate level can serve as clinical biomarkers to predict mortality in pediatric sepsis. A PELOD-2 score of >8 can predict mortality with reasonably good sensitivity and specificity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测儿科患者败血症死亡率的临床和生物标志物方法
脓毒症是儿童发病和死亡的主要原因。印度尼西亚败血症死亡率的流行率在22.5%至52%之间。目的探讨预测脓毒症死亡率的临床标准,评价PELOD-2评分的应用价值。方法回顾性队列研究纳入2015年1月至2020年5月在印度尼西亚雅加达Cipto Mangunkusumo医院急诊科或儿科重症监护病房(PICU)就诊的儿童患者。人口统计学特征(年龄和性别)、临床表现(营养状况、是否存在休克、是否需要插管、感染来源、肌力药物的使用、平均动脉压、脉搏率、呼吸率和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分)、实验室[白细胞、血小板、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比(NLCR)、降钙素原、c反应蛋白(CRP)和乳酸谱]、peld -2评分和死亡率数据被记录为结果。结果我们分析了241例败血症患者的数据。总死亡率为65%。休克[OR 3.2 (95%CI 1.80 ~ -5.55), P33.5 mg/L [OR 2.5 (95%CI 1.14 ~ 5.35, P=0.02)]和乳酸水平>2.85 [OR 2.1 (95%CI 1.02 ~ 4.56, P=0.04)]被认为是死亡率的重要预测因子。当PELOD-2截止评分>8时,预测死亡率的敏感性(81.2%)和特异性(72.9%)最佳,OR为11.6 (95%CI 5.72 ~ 23.5), P8预测死亡率具有较好的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quality of life of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia Fetus in fetu - the included twin/entrapped twin: a case report Optic nerve sheath diameter and severity of central nervous infection Quality of life in children with chronic kidney disease Preoperative hypoalbuminemia and severe acute malnutrition as prognostic factors for postoperative complications in major abdominal surgery: A single-center retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1