Development of metallurgy of copper and copper alloys in China in the 2nd millennium BC

S. Grigoriev
{"title":"Development of metallurgy of copper and copper alloys in China in the 2nd millennium BC","authors":"S. Grigoriev","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first rare metal finds in China are dated to the Neolithic period, but most of them belong to its final phase. For this period, pure copper is known, very rare arsenic alloys, probably smelted from ore with arsenic admixtures. At the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC, in Gansu, the technology of smelting ore with the following alloying with arsenic, occasionally tin minerals were borrowed from an unknown source. This technology spread to the east, and is present in the Erlitou II layer. At the beginning of the Erlitou III phase (which corresponds to the beginning of the Shang dynasty), the tradition of the Seima-Turbino metallurgy and the technology of smelting copper sulfide ores and alloying with tin penetrated into the Yellow River basin from the north (through Shanxi) from southern Siberia. This tradition soon spread to southern China, as well as the western and northern peri-phery of Chinese civilization. The penetration of the Karasuk tradition of arsenic alloys is also observed in the west and north in the late Shang period, and the Shang and Karasuk metallurgical traditions coexisted there. A special situation formed in Xinjiang, where the Andronovo tradition of smelting sulfide ores and tin alloys pene-trated, but this penetration was limited to the west of the region. It did not affect the development of Chinese me-tallurgy. In general, in China, there is the same correspondence between the types of used ores and alloys as in the rest of Eurasia: native copper and malachite — pure copper, oxidized ores and secondary sulfides with gangue — arsenic copper, occasionally tin bronze, copper-iron sulfides — tin bronze. But in China, this sequence was driven by two technological impulses at the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC (from an unclear source) and at the end of the second half of the 2nd millennium BC from southern Siberia. In addition, during the late Shang period, the interaction of the Shang and Karasuk traditions occurred in the north and west.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first rare metal finds in China are dated to the Neolithic period, but most of them belong to its final phase. For this period, pure copper is known, very rare arsenic alloys, probably smelted from ore with arsenic admixtures. At the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC, in Gansu, the technology of smelting ore with the following alloying with arsenic, occasionally tin minerals were borrowed from an unknown source. This technology spread to the east, and is present in the Erlitou II layer. At the beginning of the Erlitou III phase (which corresponds to the beginning of the Shang dynasty), the tradition of the Seima-Turbino metallurgy and the technology of smelting copper sulfide ores and alloying with tin penetrated into the Yellow River basin from the north (through Shanxi) from southern Siberia. This tradition soon spread to southern China, as well as the western and northern peri-phery of Chinese civilization. The penetration of the Karasuk tradition of arsenic alloys is also observed in the west and north in the late Shang period, and the Shang and Karasuk metallurgical traditions coexisted there. A special situation formed in Xinjiang, where the Andronovo tradition of smelting sulfide ores and tin alloys pene-trated, but this penetration was limited to the west of the region. It did not affect the development of Chinese me-tallurgy. In general, in China, there is the same correspondence between the types of used ores and alloys as in the rest of Eurasia: native copper and malachite — pure copper, oxidized ores and secondary sulfides with gangue — arsenic copper, occasionally tin bronze, copper-iron sulfides — tin bronze. But in China, this sequence was driven by two technological impulses at the beginning of the 2nd millennium BC (from an unclear source) and at the end of the second half of the 2nd millennium BC from southern Siberia. In addition, during the late Shang period, the interaction of the Shang and Karasuk traditions occurred in the north and west.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公元前2000年中国铜和铜合金冶金的发展
中国首次发现的稀有金属可以追溯到新石器时代,但大多数属于新石器时代的最后阶段。在这一时期,纯铜是已知的,非常罕见的砷合金,可能是从含有砷混合物的矿石中冶炼出来的。公元前2000年初,在甘肃,用砷合金冶炼矿石的技术,偶尔也借用了来源不明的锡矿物。这种技术向东传播,并出现在二里头二层。二里头三期初期(相当于商朝初期),西马-特比诺冶金的传统和冶炼硫化铜矿石和锡合金的技术从南西伯利亚向北(经山西)渗透到黄河流域。这一传统很快传播到中国南方,以及中国文明的西部和北部边缘。在商代后期,西部和北部地区也出现了卡拉苏克砷合金传统的渗透,商代和卡拉苏克冶金传统并存。在新疆形成了一种特殊的情况,安德罗诺沃冶炼硫化矿和锡合金的传统在这里得到了渗透,但这种渗透仅限于西部地区。这并没有影响中国冶金的发展。总的来说,在中国,使用的矿石和合金的类型与欧亚大陆其他地区相同:天然铜和孔雀石-纯铜,氧化矿石和含脉石的次级硫化物-砷铜,偶尔有锡青铜,铜铁硫化物-锡青铜。但在中国,这一序列是由公元前2千年初(来源不明)和公元前2千年下半叶结束时来自南西伯利亚的两种技术冲动推动的。此外,在商朝晚期,商朝和卡拉苏克传统在北部和西部发生了相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii
Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Russia Germans in the Turkestan Governorate-General: resettlement and economic activity (the last third of the 19th — beginning of the 20th century) On the lunula stone pendants and their taiga counterparts When the connectivity is lost: infrastructural uncertainty and reaction to it amongst the tundra nomads of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug On the status and selectivity of the infant burials of the Yamnaya Archaeological Culture of the Southern Urals (based on the excavation materials of the burial mound No. 1 of the Boldyrevo-4 group) Modernisation of the historical memory and national identity in the Republic of Kazakhstan: a means of the formation and translation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1