A linear relationship between De Ritis ratio and mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A secondary analysis based on a large retrospective cohort study

Yanling Fu, Shouwen Du, Xiaodi Liu, Lin Cao, Guilin Yang, Hongtao Chen
{"title":"A linear relationship between De Ritis ratio and mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A secondary analysis based on a large retrospective cohort study","authors":"Yanling Fu,&nbsp;Shouwen Du,&nbsp;Xiaodi Liu,&nbsp;Lin Cao,&nbsp;Guilin Yang,&nbsp;Hongtao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.iliver.2022.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>Although some studies have identified a possible link between the De Ritis ratio and the mortality of patients with COVID-19), the predictive value and the optimal cut-value remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the correlation between the De Ritis ratio and mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 .</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The data for this cohort study came from a retrospective cohort study that was carried out in a medical system in New York City. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality of included patients. The researchers ran multivariate Cox regression analyses, curve fitting, and subgroup analysis to support our findings. Overall survival in different De Ritis ratio groups was plotted as Kaplan–Meier survival curves.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study enrolled 4371 participants with COVID-19 from March 1, 2020 to April 16, 2020. The overall mortality was 24.8% (1082/4371). The curve fitting analyses indicated that the De Ritis ratio has a positive linear connection with mortality in patients with COVID-19. After adjusting for all covariates, participants with a De Ritis ratio ≥2 exhibited 1.29 times the risk of in-hospital mortality compared with those with a De Ritis ratio &lt;1 (hazard ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.62, <em>p</em> = 0.031). The <em>p</em> for trend was &lt;0.05 for all models. Patients in the group with a De Ritis ratio ≥2 experienced the shortest survival time in the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A higher baseline De Ritis ratio is correlated with a corresponding higher mortality among hospitalized people with COVID-19.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100657,"journal":{"name":"iLIVER","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 169-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277294782200041X/pdfft?md5=5e4db98f5f62a23d19fa0a36974d1ea8&pid=1-s2.0-S277294782200041X-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iLIVER","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277294782200041X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and aims

Although some studies have identified a possible link between the De Ritis ratio and the mortality of patients with COVID-19), the predictive value and the optimal cut-value remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the correlation between the De Ritis ratio and mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 .

Methods

The data for this cohort study came from a retrospective cohort study that was carried out in a medical system in New York City. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality of included patients. The researchers ran multivariate Cox regression analyses, curve fitting, and subgroup analysis to support our findings. Overall survival in different De Ritis ratio groups was plotted as Kaplan–Meier survival curves.

Results

The study enrolled 4371 participants with COVID-19 from March 1, 2020 to April 16, 2020. The overall mortality was 24.8% (1082/4371). The curve fitting analyses indicated that the De Ritis ratio has a positive linear connection with mortality in patients with COVID-19. After adjusting for all covariates, participants with a De Ritis ratio ≥2 exhibited 1.29 times the risk of in-hospital mortality compared with those with a De Ritis ratio <1 (hazard ratio 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.62, p = 0.031). The p for trend was <0.05 for all models. Patients in the group with a De Ritis ratio ≥2 experienced the shortest survival time in the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.

Conclusions

A higher baseline De Ritis ratio is correlated with a corresponding higher mortality among hospitalized people with COVID-19.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19住院患者De - Ritis比率与死亡率之间的线性关系:基于大型回顾性队列研究的二次分析
背景与目的尽管一些研究已经确定了De - Ritis比率与COVID-19患者死亡率之间的可能联系,但其预测价值和最佳临界值仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨COVID-19住院患者的De - Ritis比率与死亡率的相关性。方法本队列研究的数据来自于在纽约市某医疗系统进行的回顾性队列研究。主要终点是纳入患者的住院死亡率。研究人员进行了多变量Cox回归分析、曲线拟合和亚组分析来支持我们的发现。不同De - Ritis比率组的总生存率绘制为Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。结果该研究从2020年3月1日至2020年4月16日招募了4371名COVID-19参与者。总死亡率为24.8%(1082/4371)。曲线拟合分析显示,De - Ritis ratio与COVID-19患者死亡率呈线性正相关。在对所有协变量进行调整后,De Ritis比率≥2的受试者的住院死亡率是De Ritis比率为<1的受试者的1.29倍(风险比1.29,95%可信区间1.02-1.62,p = 0.031)。所有模型的趋势p为<0.05。Kaplan-Meier生存分析中,De Ritis比值≥2组患者的生存时间最短。结论2019冠状病毒病住院患者基线德炎比越高,相应的死亡率越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Duodenal varices and evaluation of endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for treatment of duodenal variceal bleeding Detection of metabolic signatures implicated in the progression from hepatitis to cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma Emerging role of natural bioactive compounds in navigating the future of liver disease New approaches to the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver with natural products WGCNA combined with machine learning to explore potential biomarkers and treatment strategies for acute liver failure, with experimental validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1