Safety of Upper Extremity Surgery After Prior Treatment for Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: Results of an American Society for Surgery of the Hand Membership Survey and Literature Review

Idris S. Gharbaoui MD , David T. Netscher MD , John Thornby PhD , Fred B. Kessler MD
{"title":"Safety of Upper Extremity Surgery After Prior Treatment for Ipsilateral Breast Cancer: Results of an American Society for Surgery of the Hand Membership Survey and Literature Review","authors":"Idris S. Gharbaoui MD ,&nbsp;David T. Netscher MD ,&nbsp;John Thornby PhD ,&nbsp;Fred B. Kessler MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jassh.2005.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Lymphedema<span><span>, infection, and healing delay are among feared complications in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery after prior mastectomy and axillary dissection with or without radiation therapy. Most of these cancer patients are advised to avoid any procedure on their ipsilateral upper extremity including blood pressure monitoring, </span>intravenous punctures<span><span>, and surgery. As a result, many of these patients hesitate to undergo necessary upper extremity surgery such as arthritis surgery and even carpal tunnel release. Many hand and upper extremity surgeons believe that these precautions are unnecessarily stringent and believe that indicated upper extremity surgeries could be performed safely in these patients. We surveyed 1,200 members of The American Society for Surgery of the Hand and the 606 returned questionnaires were analyzed. More than 95% of the hand surgeons surveyed do not hesitate to perform surgery on an upper extremity in a patient after ipsilateral lymphadenectomy and/or irradiation, decreasing to 85% if there is pre-existing chronic lymphedema; 94% use a tourniquet in a routine fashion (74% use a tourniquet in the presence of existing lymphedema); 46% use a Bier block when clinically indicated (only 21% would use a Bier block in a patient with lymphedema); and 36% are comfortable using an axillary block (25% in the case of lymphedema). Thus, most of the polled surgeons would prefer to perform surgery on these patients under a general anesthetic, but still would use an extremity tourniquet for a bloodless surgical field in their routine manner. The rate of reported complications in these patients was 23% in patients with pre-existing chronic lymphedema and only 3% in patients with no lymphedema. After surgery, 46.2% of the surgeons do not undertake any additional precautions than in their routine practice with all upper extremity surgery patients. However, 53.8% would change their routine practice for such patients and these changes range from placing the surgical tourniquet on the forearm instead of the upper arm, use of perioperative prophylactic antibiotics in all patients irrespective of the type of surgery, use of postoperative </span>compression garments, and specific postoperative hand therapy aimed at the prevention of </span></span></span>postoperative edema.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100840,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 232-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jassh.2005.08.005","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1531091405001464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Lymphedema, infection, and healing delay are among feared complications in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery after prior mastectomy and axillary dissection with or without radiation therapy. Most of these cancer patients are advised to avoid any procedure on their ipsilateral upper extremity including blood pressure monitoring, intravenous punctures, and surgery. As a result, many of these patients hesitate to undergo necessary upper extremity surgery such as arthritis surgery and even carpal tunnel release. Many hand and upper extremity surgeons believe that these precautions are unnecessarily stringent and believe that indicated upper extremity surgeries could be performed safely in these patients. We surveyed 1,200 members of The American Society for Surgery of the Hand and the 606 returned questionnaires were analyzed. More than 95% of the hand surgeons surveyed do not hesitate to perform surgery on an upper extremity in a patient after ipsilateral lymphadenectomy and/or irradiation, decreasing to 85% if there is pre-existing chronic lymphedema; 94% use a tourniquet in a routine fashion (74% use a tourniquet in the presence of existing lymphedema); 46% use a Bier block when clinically indicated (only 21% would use a Bier block in a patient with lymphedema); and 36% are comfortable using an axillary block (25% in the case of lymphedema). Thus, most of the polled surgeons would prefer to perform surgery on these patients under a general anesthetic, but still would use an extremity tourniquet for a bloodless surgical field in their routine manner. The rate of reported complications in these patients was 23% in patients with pre-existing chronic lymphedema and only 3% in patients with no lymphedema. After surgery, 46.2% of the surgeons do not undertake any additional precautions than in their routine practice with all upper extremity surgery patients. However, 53.8% would change their routine practice for such patients and these changes range from placing the surgical tourniquet on the forearm instead of the upper arm, use of perioperative prophylactic antibiotics in all patients irrespective of the type of surgery, use of postoperative compression garments, and specific postoperative hand therapy aimed at the prevention of postoperative edema.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同侧乳腺癌术前治疗后上肢手术的安全性:美国手部外科学会会员调查和文献综述的结果
淋巴水肿、感染和愈合延迟是患者在先前的乳房切除术和腋窝清扫术后进行上肢手术时最担心的并发症,无论是否接受放射治疗。大多数癌症患者被建议避免对其同侧上肢进行任何手术,包括血压监测、静脉穿刺和手术。因此,许多患者不愿接受必要的上肢手术,如关节炎手术,甚至是腕管松解术。许多手部和上肢外科医生认为这些预防措施是不必要的严格,并认为在这些患者中可以安全地进行上肢手术。我们调查了1200名美国手部外科学会的会员,并对606份返回的问卷进行了分析。超过95%的受访手外科医生在接受同侧淋巴结切除术和/或放疗后会毫不犹豫地对患者的上肢进行手术,如果患者已有慢性淋巴水肿,这一比例降至85%;94%常规使用止血带(74%存在淋巴水肿时使用止血带);46%的人在临床指征时使用比尔阻滞(只有21%的人会在淋巴水肿患者中使用比尔阻滞);36%的患者对使用腋窝阻滞感到舒适(25%的患者有淋巴水肿)。因此,大多数被调查的外科医生倾向于在全身麻醉下对这些患者进行手术,但仍会以常规方式使用四肢止血带进行无血手术野。在已有慢性淋巴水肿的患者中,报告的并发症发生率为23%,而在无淋巴水肿的患者中仅为3%。手术后,46.2%的外科医生对所有上肢手术患者不采取任何额外的预防措施。然而,53.8%的医生会改变对这类患者的常规做法,这些改变包括将手术止血带放在前臂而不是上臂,在所有患者中使用围手术期预防性抗生素,无论手术类型如何,使用术后压缩服,以及旨在预防术后水肿的术后特殊手部治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Table of contents Subject index Author index Metacarpophalangeal Joint Silicone Implant Arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1