{"title":"Becoming Carole Lombard: Stardom, Comedy, and Legacy","authors":"Zsófia Anna Tóth","doi":"10.5325/studamerhumor.8.2.0404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"met Groucho Marx and got invited to the famous club, the first one for Jewish people in Los Angeles, regaling his readers with the tales that tickled him when he first heard them from George Burns, Jack Benny, and Danny Thomas, but the movement from 1969 to 1987 is almost instantaneous, and it is unclear exactly why he goes back to the 1960s and early 1970s before closing out this chapter. The rest of the book follows the same pattern—recollections of specific moments in history in the context of a thematic overview. Though Steinberg’s groupings are logical and the tales throughout his memoir are captivating, the narrative moving around in time confuses, like a joke that does not land well. The problem is understandable, especially when considering that David Steinberg has been active since the 1960s, has met many of the most highly regarded Canadian and American comedians since the 1930s, and tells stories from across almost a century of comedy. Nevertheless, arranging all the chapters either thematically or chronologically would have made this valuable memoir easier to follow. Overall, this book is a must read if one wants to learn more about not only David Steinberg but also the many brilliant, talented people he has known over the course of his life. He clearly treasures the many friendships he has with those still living as well as the memories he made with those who have passed on. For anyone who wishes for stories from behind the scenes, reading the memoir is worth the time.","PeriodicalId":53944,"journal":{"name":"Studies in American Humor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in American Humor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.8.2.0404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
met Groucho Marx and got invited to the famous club, the first one for Jewish people in Los Angeles, regaling his readers with the tales that tickled him when he first heard them from George Burns, Jack Benny, and Danny Thomas, but the movement from 1969 to 1987 is almost instantaneous, and it is unclear exactly why he goes back to the 1960s and early 1970s before closing out this chapter. The rest of the book follows the same pattern—recollections of specific moments in history in the context of a thematic overview. Though Steinberg’s groupings are logical and the tales throughout his memoir are captivating, the narrative moving around in time confuses, like a joke that does not land well. The problem is understandable, especially when considering that David Steinberg has been active since the 1960s, has met many of the most highly regarded Canadian and American comedians since the 1930s, and tells stories from across almost a century of comedy. Nevertheless, arranging all the chapters either thematically or chronologically would have made this valuable memoir easier to follow. Overall, this book is a must read if one wants to learn more about not only David Steinberg but also the many brilliant, talented people he has known over the course of his life. He clearly treasures the many friendships he has with those still living as well as the memories he made with those who have passed on. For anyone who wishes for stories from behind the scenes, reading the memoir is worth the time.
期刊介绍:
Welcome to the home of Studies in American Humor, the journal of the American Humor Studies Association. Founded by the American Humor Studies Association in 1974 and published continuously since 1982, StAH specializes in humanistic research on humor in America (loosely defined) because the universal human capacity for humor is always expressed within the specific contexts of time, place, and audience that research methods in the humanities strive to address. Such methods now extend well beyond the literary and film analyses that once formed the core of American humor scholarship to a wide range of critical, biographical, historical, theoretical, archival, ethnographic, and digital studies of humor in performance and public life as well as in print and other media. StAH’s expanded editorial board of specialists marks that growth. On behalf of the editorial board, I invite scholars across the humanities to submit their best work on topics in American humor and join us in advancing knowledge in the field.