Use Of Formative Assessment-Based Active Learning By Astronomy Educators Teaching In Live Planetarium Learning Environments

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Astronomy and Earth Sciences Education Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.19030/jaese.v8i1.10389
Sara K. Schultz, T. Slater
{"title":"Use Of Formative Assessment-Based Active Learning By Astronomy Educators Teaching In Live Planetarium Learning Environments","authors":"Sara K. Schultz, T. Slater","doi":"10.19030/jaese.v8i1.10389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planetariums were created to teach astronomy by simulating motions of the star-filled night sky; however, simply having a virtual reality facility to immerse learners beneath a projected night sky in and of itself is insufficient to automatically ensure student learning occurs. Modern teaching strategies, like active learning, have consistently shown to move students toward deeper understanding in classrooms; yet, active learning approaches seem to be only rarely observed in planetariums. Use of Ruiz-Primo and Furtak’s (2006) coding scheme to define and analyze formative assessment conversations between classroom teachers and students reveals that unless teachers are formally taught how to use formative assessment-based active learning, such approaches are largely absent in classrooms studied. The goal of this 2-phase study was to evaluate the nature of active learning-based formative assessment conversation cycles in the planetarium. The first phase systematically analyzes 26 recordings of live planetarium programs to describe and document presence of active learning teaching strategies. The second phase conducts interviews to determine rewards and barriers to using formative assessment-based active learning in the planetarium. Analysis suggests scant evidence of complete formative assessment conversation cycles, despite that varying degrees of interactivity between the planetarium lecturer and the audience do exist. It is not that planetariansdon’t ask questions, but responses rarely serve to systematically guide instructional decisions aligned with modern pedagogy. Moreover, these planetarians hold a wide range of definitions of what constitutes active learning and often view their primary responsibility as inspiration rather than education, lending explanatory power to why active learning is largely absent.","PeriodicalId":52014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astronomy and Earth Sciences Education","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astronomy and Earth Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19030/jaese.v8i1.10389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Planetariums were created to teach astronomy by simulating motions of the star-filled night sky; however, simply having a virtual reality facility to immerse learners beneath a projected night sky in and of itself is insufficient to automatically ensure student learning occurs. Modern teaching strategies, like active learning, have consistently shown to move students toward deeper understanding in classrooms; yet, active learning approaches seem to be only rarely observed in planetariums. Use of Ruiz-Primo and Furtak’s (2006) coding scheme to define and analyze formative assessment conversations between classroom teachers and students reveals that unless teachers are formally taught how to use formative assessment-based active learning, such approaches are largely absent in classrooms studied. The goal of this 2-phase study was to evaluate the nature of active learning-based formative assessment conversation cycles in the planetarium. The first phase systematically analyzes 26 recordings of live planetarium programs to describe and document presence of active learning teaching strategies. The second phase conducts interviews to determine rewards and barriers to using formative assessment-based active learning in the planetarium. Analysis suggests scant evidence of complete formative assessment conversation cycles, despite that varying degrees of interactivity between the planetarium lecturer and the audience do exist. It is not that planetariansdon’t ask questions, but responses rarely serve to systematically guide instructional decisions aligned with modern pedagogy. Moreover, these planetarians hold a wide range of definitions of what constitutes active learning and often view their primary responsibility as inspiration rather than education, lending explanatory power to why active learning is largely absent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天文教育者在实时天文馆学习环境中运用形成性评估为基础的主动学习
天文馆的创建是为了通过模拟繁星满天的夜空的运动来教授天文学;然而,仅仅有一个虚拟现实设备,让学习者沉浸在投影的夜空下,本身并不足以自动确保学生学习。现代教学策略,如主动学习,一直被证明能让学生在课堂上更深入地理解;然而,积极的学习方法似乎很少在天文馆被观察到。使用Ruiz-Primo和Furtak(2006)的编码方案来定义和分析课堂教师与学生之间的形成性评估对话表明,除非教师被正式教授如何使用基于形成性评估的主动学习,否则这些方法在所研究的课堂中基本上是缺席的。本研究分为两个阶段,目的是评估天文馆主动学习形成性评估对话周期的性质。第一阶段系统地分析了26个现场天文馆节目的录音,以描述和记录主动学习教学策略的存在。第二阶段进行访谈,以确定在天文馆使用基于形成性评估的主动学习的奖励和障碍。分析表明,尽管天文馆讲师和听众之间确实存在不同程度的互动,但缺乏完整的形成性评估对话周期的证据。这并不是说行星人不会问问题,但这些回答很少能系统地指导与现代教育学一致的教学决策。此外,这些行星学家对什么是主动学习有着广泛的定义,他们通常认为自己的主要责任是激励而不是教育,这就解释了为什么主动学习在很大程度上是缺席的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Astronomy and Earth Sciences Education
Journal of Astronomy and Earth Sciences Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
66.70%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Essay: original review of high-dimensional spaces and astronomy theories in modern physics The applicable theories on the universe formation and development The formation mechanism and forecasting of earthquakes Why does Ocean between NZ and Australia a Climate Change "Hot spot" in Climate Change? The magnetism across time-spaces and the driving force of celestial rotation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1