Screening with Network Externalities

Fanqi Shi, Yiqing Xing
{"title":"Screening with Network Externalities","authors":"Fanqi Shi, Yiqing Xing","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3286427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network externality is a prominent feature of increasingly many products: the marginal payoff of one’s consumption increases as his neighbors consume more. In- formation of network structure is important to the seller, but is often privately known to the buyers. We model a monopoly’s optimal pricing strategy to “screen” buyers’ network information: their susceptibility (out-degree) and influence (in-degree). Our main result is that susceptibility and influence have different effects on the optimal allocations and can be separated out in the optimal screening contracts. Specifically, we characterize the optimal allocations for both directed networks where each buyer’s susceptibility and influence are independent, and undirected networks where the two are identical. For directed networks, we show the optimal allocation only depends on a buyer’s susceptibility and exhibits simple forms with quadratic intrinsic value. We further contrast the analysis with two benchmarks – complete information pricing and uniform pricing – to shed light on the value of screening and the value of network in- formation. For undirected networks, we show the seller directly screens buyers on their susceptibility and indirectly condition the allocations on their inferred influence. We also extend the model to accommodate for (1) weak affiliation between a buyer’s susceptibility and influence, (2) the case in which the monopoly can incentivize influence with contingent contracts (referral bonuses), and (3) the situation in which susceptibility and influence are endogenous to the optimal allocations.","PeriodicalId":11062,"journal":{"name":"Development of Innovation eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3286427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Network externality is a prominent feature of increasingly many products: the marginal payoff of one’s consumption increases as his neighbors consume more. In- formation of network structure is important to the seller, but is often privately known to the buyers. We model a monopoly’s optimal pricing strategy to “screen” buyers’ network information: their susceptibility (out-degree) and influence (in-degree). Our main result is that susceptibility and influence have different effects on the optimal allocations and can be separated out in the optimal screening contracts. Specifically, we characterize the optimal allocations for both directed networks where each buyer’s susceptibility and influence are independent, and undirected networks where the two are identical. For directed networks, we show the optimal allocation only depends on a buyer’s susceptibility and exhibits simple forms with quadratic intrinsic value. We further contrast the analysis with two benchmarks – complete information pricing and uniform pricing – to shed light on the value of screening and the value of network in- formation. For undirected networks, we show the seller directly screens buyers on their susceptibility and indirectly condition the allocations on their inferred influence. We also extend the model to accommodate for (1) weak affiliation between a buyer’s susceptibility and influence, (2) the case in which the monopoly can incentivize influence with contingent contracts (referral bonuses), and (3) the situation in which susceptibility and influence are endogenous to the optimal allocations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络外部性筛选
网络外部性是越来越多的产品的一个突出特征:一个人消费的边际收益随着他的邻居消费的增加而增加。网络结构的信息对卖方来说很重要,但对买方来说往往是私下知道的。我们对垄断企业的最优定价策略进行建模,以“筛选”买家的网络信息:他们的敏感性(出度)和影响力(入度)。我们的主要结果是敏感性和影响对最优分配有不同的影响,并且可以在最优筛选契约中分离出来。具体来说,我们描述了两个有向网络的最优分配,其中每个买家的敏感性和影响力是独立的,以及两者相同的无向网络。对于有向网络,我们证明了最优配置仅取决于买方的敏感性,并展示了具有二次内在值的简单形式。我们进一步将分析与完全信息定价和统一定价两个基准进行对比,以揭示筛选的价值和网络信息的价值。对于无向网络,我们表明卖方直接根据买家的敏感性筛选买家,并间接根据他们的推断影响来限制分配。我们还扩展了该模型,以适应(1)买方易感性和影响力之间的弱关联,(2)垄断可以通过或有合同(推荐奖金)激励影响力的情况,以及(3)易感性和影响力对最优配置是内生的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Development Contests Financial Innovation in the 21st Century: Evidence from U.S. Patents Local Technology Adoption and Innovation: The Establishment of U.S. Airmail and the Organization of Aviation Innovation Paying off the Competition: Market Power and Innovation Incentives Conceptualizing Strategic Innovation in a Firm Context: A Theoretical Review and Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1