CLIMATE FINANCE IN THE WAKE OF COVID-19: CONNECTEDNESS OF CLEAN ENERGY WITH CONVENTIONAL ENERGY AND REGIONAL STOCK MARKETS

IF 2.3 4区 经济学 0 ECONOMICS Climate Change Economics Pub Date : 2022-02-25 DOI:10.1142/s2010007822400085
Sitara Karim, Shabeer Khan, Nawazish Mirza, S. Alawi, Farhad Taghizadeh‐Hesary
{"title":"CLIMATE FINANCE IN THE WAKE OF COVID-19: CONNECTEDNESS OF CLEAN ENERGY WITH CONVENTIONAL ENERGY AND REGIONAL STOCK MARKETS","authors":"Sitara Karim, Shabeer Khan, Nawazish Mirza, S. Alawi, Farhad Taghizadeh‐Hesary","doi":"10.1142/s2010007822400085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focusing on raising climate concerns and sustaining a clean ecosystem, the current study strives to examine the connectedness of clean energy markets with conventional energy markets and four regional stock markets of Asia, Pacific, Europe, and America for the period spanning January 1, 2004 to August 31, 2021. We employed the volatility connectedness methodology using dynamic conditional correlation (DCC-GARCH) estimates for analysis purposes. There is pronounced within class connectedness of all markets except conventional energy markets, which showed strong disconnection from the network. However, strong inter-class spillovers are reported between clean energy and regional stock markets. Time-varying analysis revealed that intense spillovers are shaped during the Global Financial Crisis, Shale Oil Crisis, and COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, time-varying net connectedness estimates illuminate that world renewable energy and American stock markets are net transmitters, whereas leftover markets are net recipients of spillovers. Further analysis of sub-sample periods during GFC, SOR, and COVID-19 validate that intense spillovers are formed when markets experience unexpected financial, economic, and global health turmoil. We proposed significant implications for regional stock markets of Asia, Pacific, Europe and America to concentrate on the climate-friendly energy markets than conventional energy markets as they service the clean ecosystem motives more specifically.","PeriodicalId":45922,"journal":{"name":"Climate Change Economics","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Change Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010007822400085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Focusing on raising climate concerns and sustaining a clean ecosystem, the current study strives to examine the connectedness of clean energy markets with conventional energy markets and four regional stock markets of Asia, Pacific, Europe, and America for the period spanning January 1, 2004 to August 31, 2021. We employed the volatility connectedness methodology using dynamic conditional correlation (DCC-GARCH) estimates for analysis purposes. There is pronounced within class connectedness of all markets except conventional energy markets, which showed strong disconnection from the network. However, strong inter-class spillovers are reported between clean energy and regional stock markets. Time-varying analysis revealed that intense spillovers are shaped during the Global Financial Crisis, Shale Oil Crisis, and COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, time-varying net connectedness estimates illuminate that world renewable energy and American stock markets are net transmitters, whereas leftover markets are net recipients of spillovers. Further analysis of sub-sample periods during GFC, SOR, and COVID-19 validate that intense spillovers are formed when markets experience unexpected financial, economic, and global health turmoil. We proposed significant implications for regional stock markets of Asia, Pacific, Europe and America to concentrate on the climate-friendly energy markets than conventional energy markets as they service the clean ecosystem motives more specifically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病后的气候融资:清洁能源与传统能源和区域股票市场的连通性
本研究着眼于提高对气候问题的关注和维持清洁生态系统,努力考察2004年1月1日至2021年8月31日期间清洁能源市场与传统能源市场以及亚太、欧洲和美洲四个区域股票市场的连通性。我们采用波动连通性方法,使用动态条件相关(DCC-GARCH)估计进行分析。除传统能源市场外,所有市场的阶级内连通性都很明显,传统能源市场表现出与网络的强烈脱节。然而,据报道,清洁能源和区域股票市场之间存在强烈的阶级间溢出效应。时变分析显示,全球金融危机、页岩油危机和COVID-19大流行期间形成了强烈的溢出效应。与此同时,时变的净连通性估计表明,世界可再生能源和美国股票市场是净发送者,而剩余市场是溢出效应的净接受者。对全球金融危机、SOR和COVID-19期间的子样本期的进一步分析证实,当市场经历意外的金融、经济和全球卫生动荡时,会形成强烈的溢出效应。我们提出了亚太、欧洲和美洲区域股票市场关注气候友好型能源市场而不是传统能源市场的重要意义,因为它们更具体地服务于清洁生态系统动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
17.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Climate Change Economics (CCE) publishes theoretical and empirical papers devoted to analyses of mitigation, adaptation, impacts, and other issues related to the policy and management of greenhouse gases. CCE is specifically devoted to papers in economics although it is understood that authors may need to rely on other fields for important insights. The journal is interested in papers examining the issue at every scale from local to global and papers from around the world are encouraged. CCE is also interested in both original research and review papers and welcomes comments discussing previous articles.
期刊最新文献
The Fairness Controversy over CBAM and its policy implications Climate change, adaptation, and economic outcomes: evidence from agriculture in india Do High Temperatures Dampen Chinese Urban Household Consumption? When climate changes, so does violence: Examining the link between weather and crime in Pernambuco–Northeast, Brazil The policy effect of carbon emissions trading on green technology innovation---evidence from manufacturing enterprises in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1