Atrial Septal Defect Closure by Anterior Mini Thoracotomy with Total Peripheral Cannulation: A Step towards Establishing Mini Invasive Cardiac Surgery in a Developing Nation

P. Khakural, R. Baral, A. Bhattarai, B. Koirala
{"title":"Atrial Septal Defect Closure by Anterior Mini Thoracotomy with Total Peripheral Cannulation: A Step towards Establishing Mini Invasive Cardiac Surgery in a Developing Nation","authors":"P. Khakural, R. Baral, A. Bhattarai, B. Koirala","doi":"10.4236/wjcs.2020.1010022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Atrial Septal Defect \n(ASD) closure is a common cardiac surgical procedure performed worldwide. Due \nto favourable clinical outcome, minimal invasive approach is becoming popular. \nHence this study was conducted to compare the outcome of two surgical \napproaches, median sternotomy and mini thoracotomy with total peripheral \ncannulation, in a developing country Nepal. Methods: A prospective study \nof 62 ASD patients, randomized to undergo surgical closure either via right \nanterior mini thoracotomy or median sternotomy was conducted and followed up \nover three years. The clinical outcome parameters like intensive care unit \nstay, hospital stay, post-operative duration of ventilation, cardiopulmonary \nbypass time, aortic cross clamp time, mediastinal drainage, size of scar and \ncomplication were compared between two groups. Results: Cardiopulmonary \nbypass time and aortic cross clamp time were significantly longer in right \nanterior mini thoracotomy group as compared to median sternotomy group (43.97 min ± 12.70 min vs 34.42 min ± 10.42 min and 25.13 min ± 7.82 min vs 19.48 min ± 6.93 min respectively, p-value 0.05). There was no significant difference in duration of surgery (2.75 hrs ± 0.43 hrs vs 2.56 hrs ± 0.41 hrs, p-value = 0.09), post-operative ventilation (2.90 hrs ± 1.22 hrs and 2.88 hrs ± 1.07 hrs, p-value = 0.96) between two groups. Post-operative mediastinal drainage was \nsignificantly less in right anterior mini thoracotomy group (214.52 ml ± 91.79 ml vs 284.03 ml ± 158.91 ml, p-value = 0.04). There was no significant difference in ICU stay and hospital stay. Conclusion: Atrial septal defect can be safely closed by right anterior \nmini thoracotomy with a small, cosmetically acceptable submammary scar with \nless pain and bleeding.","PeriodicalId":23646,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcs.2020.1010022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) closure is a common cardiac surgical procedure performed worldwide. Due to favourable clinical outcome, minimal invasive approach is becoming popular. Hence this study was conducted to compare the outcome of two surgical approaches, median sternotomy and mini thoracotomy with total peripheral cannulation, in a developing country Nepal. Methods: A prospective study of 62 ASD patients, randomized to undergo surgical closure either via right anterior mini thoracotomy or median sternotomy was conducted and followed up over three years. The clinical outcome parameters like intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, post-operative duration of ventilation, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross clamp time, mediastinal drainage, size of scar and complication were compared between two groups. Results: Cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross clamp time were significantly longer in right anterior mini thoracotomy group as compared to median sternotomy group (43.97 min ± 12.70 min vs 34.42 min ± 10.42 min and 25.13 min ± 7.82 min vs 19.48 min ± 6.93 min respectively, p-value 0.05). There was no significant difference in duration of surgery (2.75 hrs ± 0.43 hrs vs 2.56 hrs ± 0.41 hrs, p-value = 0.09), post-operative ventilation (2.90 hrs ± 1.22 hrs and 2.88 hrs ± 1.07 hrs, p-value = 0.96) between two groups. Post-operative mediastinal drainage was significantly less in right anterior mini thoracotomy group (214.52 ml ± 91.79 ml vs 284.03 ml ± 158.91 ml, p-value = 0.04). There was no significant difference in ICU stay and hospital stay. Conclusion: Atrial septal defect can be safely closed by right anterior mini thoracotomy with a small, cosmetically acceptable submammary scar with less pain and bleeding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心房间隔缺损前路小开胸术加全外周插管闭合:在发展中国家建立微创心脏手术的一步
背景:房间隔缺损(ASD)关闭是世界范围内常见的心脏外科手术。由于良好的临床效果,微创入路越来越受欢迎。因此,本研究在发展中国家尼泊尔进行了比较两种手术入路的结果,胸骨正中切开术和全外周插管的小开胸术。方法:对62例ASD患者进行前瞻性研究,随机选择右前方小胸切开术或胸骨正中切开术进行手术封闭,随访3年以上。比较两组患者重症监护病房时间、住院时间、术后通气时间、体外循环时间、主动脉交叉夹持时间、纵隔引流、瘢痕大小及并发症等临床结局参数。结果:右前方小开胸组体外循环时间和主动脉交叉夹持时间(43.97 min±12.70 min vs 34.42 min±10.42 min)明显长于胸骨正中开胸组(25.13 min±7.82 min vs 19.48 min±6.93 min), p值均为0.05。两组患者手术时间(2.75 h±0.43 h vs 2.56 h±0.41 h, p值= 0.09)、术后通气时间(2.90 h±1.22 h vs 2.88 h±1.07 h, p值= 0.96)差异无统计学意义。右侧前路小开胸组术后纵隔引流明显减少(214.52 ml±91.79 ml vs 284.03 ml±158.91 ml, p值= 0.04)。ICU住院时间与住院时间差异无统计学意义。结论:房间隔缺损可通过右前小开胸术安全封闭,乳下瘢痕面积小,美观,疼痛少,出血少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Myocardial Infarction: Mode of Revelation of a Left Atrium Myxoma Cardiac Manifestations with Chemotherapeutic Agents: 5 Fluorouracil-Induced Coronary Artery Vasospasm Microbiological and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Level Hospital in Nepal Cardiovascular Function during First 24 Hours after Off-Pump and On-Pump CABG—A Prospective Observational Comparative Study Is Anticoagulation Warranted after Left Atrial Appendage Ligation in Patients at Risk for Stroke after Cardiac Surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1