Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Multi Optimization of GTAC Process Parameters

IF 1.3 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Pub Date : 2022-02-18 DOI:10.3311/ppme.19835
R. Ranjan, A. Saha, Anil Kumar Das Kumar Das
{"title":"Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Multi Optimization of GTAC Process Parameters","authors":"R. Ranjan, A. Saha, Anil Kumar Das Kumar Das","doi":"10.3311/ppme.19835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A great deal of investigation on gas tungsten arc cladding (GTAC) is focused on the study of enhancements in the microstructure, mechanical and tribological features of the cladding. The selection of right process parameters is a critical issue for the researchers. Decision makers in the industries must analyze a wide variety of parameters based on a set of contradictory criteria. Several multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques are now available to add values in selection of these parameters. The application of the TOPSIS and MOORA techniques to identify the best configuration of processing parameters in the gas tungsten arc cladding (GTAC) process is investigated in this work. The best processing parameters set for the multiple performance attributes should be welding current: 70 amp, speed: 240, argon flow: 13 and standoff distance 3.5 (TOPSIS-PCA) and welding current: 50, speed: 300, argon flow: 13 and standoff distance 3.5 (MOORA-PCA).A comparison of MOORA-PCA and TOPSIS-PCA demonstrates the superiority of TOPSIS over MOORA technique. The prediction accuracy of the TOPSIS-PCA hybrid approach model is found better than MOORA-PCA technique.","PeriodicalId":43630,"journal":{"name":"PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-MECHANICAL ENGINEERING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/ppme.19835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A great deal of investigation on gas tungsten arc cladding (GTAC) is focused on the study of enhancements in the microstructure, mechanical and tribological features of the cladding. The selection of right process parameters is a critical issue for the researchers. Decision makers in the industries must analyze a wide variety of parameters based on a set of contradictory criteria. Several multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques are now available to add values in selection of these parameters. The application of the TOPSIS and MOORA techniques to identify the best configuration of processing parameters in the gas tungsten arc cladding (GTAC) process is investigated in this work. The best processing parameters set for the multiple performance attributes should be welding current: 70 amp, speed: 240, argon flow: 13 and standoff distance 3.5 (TOPSIS-PCA) and welding current: 50, speed: 300, argon flow: 13 and standoff distance 3.5 (MOORA-PCA).A comparison of MOORA-PCA and TOPSIS-PCA demonstrates the superiority of TOPSIS over MOORA technique. The prediction accuracy of the TOPSIS-PCA hybrid approach model is found better than MOORA-PCA technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GTAC工艺参数多准则优化决策方法的比较
对气体钨弧熔覆层(GTAC)的研究主要集中在提高熔覆层的微观结构、力学性能和摩擦学性能方面。选择合适的工艺参数是研究人员面临的一个关键问题。行业中的决策者必须根据一组相互矛盾的标准分析各种各样的参数。现在有几种多标准决策(MCDM)技术可用于在这些参数的选择中增加值。本文研究了利用TOPSIS和MOORA技术确定气体钨弧包覆(GTAC)工艺参数的最佳配置。多个性能属性的最佳工艺参数设置为:焊接电流70安培、速度240、氩气流量13、距离3.5 (TOPSIS-PCA);焊接电流50、速度300、氩气流量13、距离3.5 (MOORA-PCA)。通过对MOORA- pca和TOPSIS- pca的比较,证明了TOPSIS技术优于MOORA技术。TOPSIS-PCA混合方法模型的预测精度优于MOORA-PCA技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
33
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Periodica Polytechnica is a publisher of the Budapest University of Technology and Economics. It publishes seven international journals (Architecture, Chemical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Social and Management Sciences, Transportation Engineering). The journals have free electronic versions.
期刊最新文献
Investigating Particle Paths in Intracranial Aneurysms: A Parametric Study The Critical Length is a Good Measure to Distinguish between Stick Balancing in the ML and AP Directions Global Approach on the Shear and Cross Tension Strength of Resistance Spot Welded Thin Steel Sheets Photovoltaic Energy Generation in Hungary: Potentials of Green Hydrogen Production by PEM Technology Numerical Analysis to Investigate the Impact of Skirt Geometric Parameters on Secondary Piston Movement in a Single-cylinder Diesel Engine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1