The Drug Ambassador Project - The diversity of diagnostic procedures for drug allergy around Europe

E. Gomes, W. Pichler, P. Demoly, W. Aberer, A. Frew, A. D. Weck, B. Ballmer-Weber, A. Barbaud, B. Bilò, A. Bircher, J. Birnbaum, M. Blanca, B. Blömecke, K. Brockow, P. Campi, C. Dzviga, M. Drouet, B. Eberlein-König, Javier Fernández, T. Fuchs, J. Guéant, C. Gutgesell, M. Hertl, G. Kanny, A. Kapp, M. Kidon, M. Kowalski, G. Marone, H. Merk, A. D. Moneret-Vaultrin, C. Pascual-Marcos, B. Przybilla, J. Ring, A. Romano, F. Ruëff, A. Sabbah, J. Laudy, M. Sanz, E. Tas, M. Torres, D. Vervloet, B. Wedi, B. Wüthrich
{"title":"The Drug Ambassador Project - The diversity of diagnostic procedures for drug allergy around Europe","authors":"E. Gomes, W. Pichler, P. Demoly, W. Aberer, A. Frew, A. D. Weck, B. Ballmer-Weber, A. Barbaud, B. Bilò, A. Bircher, J. Birnbaum, M. Blanca, B. Blömecke, K. Brockow, P. Campi, C. Dzviga, M. Drouet, B. Eberlein-König, Javier Fernández, T. Fuchs, J. Guéant, C. Gutgesell, M. Hertl, G. Kanny, A. Kapp, M. Kidon, M. Kowalski, G. Marone, H. Merk, A. D. Moneret-Vaultrin, C. Pascual-Marcos, B. Przybilla, J. Ring, A. Romano, F. Ruëff, A. Sabbah, J. Laudy, M. Sanz, E. Tas, M. Torres, D. Vervloet, B. Wedi, B. Wüthrich","doi":"10.1027/0838-1925.17.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Drug allergy is an increasingly important clinical problem. About 5-10% of patients consulting allergy centers have some form of drug allergy or pseudo allergy. At present there is no consensus concerning the best way to study and diagnose hypersensitivity reactions to drugs. This leads both to practical difficulties in diagnosing individual patients and to more general problems in comparing protocols and results from different centers. Methods/Data base: The European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) Drug Ambassador Project aimed to collect information on the ways that different European centers approach these patients. Results: The present report summarizes data collected during this project, focussing on the organization of drug allergy consultations, diagnostic protocols and the various in vitro and in vivo investigation procedures in current use. The study revealed wide variation in the diagnostic procedures used for drug allergy in clinical practice, despite the apparent consensus achieved in recommendations and position papers. Conclusion: Reciprocal exchange of information and discussions based on these observations may help to achieve standardization and harmonization in this sector with significant potential benefits for patients with drug allergies.","PeriodicalId":55539,"journal":{"name":"Allergy & Clinical Immunology International","volume":"17 1","pages":"9-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy & Clinical Immunology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0838-1925.17.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Drug allergy is an increasingly important clinical problem. About 5-10% of patients consulting allergy centers have some form of drug allergy or pseudo allergy. At present there is no consensus concerning the best way to study and diagnose hypersensitivity reactions to drugs. This leads both to practical difficulties in diagnosing individual patients and to more general problems in comparing protocols and results from different centers. Methods/Data base: The European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) Drug Ambassador Project aimed to collect information on the ways that different European centers approach these patients. Results: The present report summarizes data collected during this project, focussing on the organization of drug allergy consultations, diagnostic protocols and the various in vitro and in vivo investigation procedures in current use. The study revealed wide variation in the diagnostic procedures used for drug allergy in clinical practice, despite the apparent consensus achieved in recommendations and position papers. Conclusion: Reciprocal exchange of information and discussions based on these observations may help to achieve standardization and harmonization in this sector with significant potential benefits for patients with drug allergies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物大使项目-欧洲药物过敏诊断程序的多样性
背景:药物过敏是一个日益重要的临床问题。在过敏中心就诊的患者中,约有5-10%有某种形式的药物过敏或假性过敏。目前,关于研究和诊断药物过敏反应的最佳方法尚无共识。这既导致了诊断个体患者的实际困难,也导致了比较不同中心的方案和结果的更普遍的问题。方法/数据库:欧洲药物过敏网络(ENDA)药物大使项目旨在收集有关不同欧洲中心处理这些患者的方式的信息。结果:本报告总结了本项目收集的数据,重点介绍了药物过敏会诊的组织、诊断方案以及目前使用的各种体外和体内调查程序。该研究表明,尽管在建议和立场文件中取得了明显的共识,但在临床实践中用于药物过敏的诊断程序存在很大差异。结论:基于这些观察结果的相互信息交流和讨论可能有助于实现该领域的标准化和协调,这对药物过敏患者具有重大的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The rising tide of novel allergens and allergic crosssensitizations Genetic polymorphisms in aspirin-intolerant chronic urticaria Breathe Right Strips® for nasal congestion associated with positive airway pressure therapy for sleep apnea Is allergy a result or a modifier of viral infections? An incoordination hypothesis Siglec-8 and siglec-F: Inhibitory receptors on eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1