Methoxyflurane for Relief of Procedural Pain in Burn Patients: A Prospective Single-Centre Evaluation Study

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE European burn journal Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.3390/ebj3040047
Andreas Creutzburg, M. Vestergaard, Pernille Pape, Caroline Hjelmdal, Filip Rangatchew, R. Holmgaard, L. Rasmussen
{"title":"Methoxyflurane for Relief of Procedural Pain in Burn Patients: A Prospective Single-Centre Evaluation Study","authors":"Andreas Creutzburg, M. Vestergaard, Pernille Pape, Caroline Hjelmdal, Filip Rangatchew, R. Holmgaard, L. Rasmussen","doi":"10.3390/ebj3040047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Procedural pain in burn patients continues to be a major problem. Frequently used analgesics, such as opioids, may have various side effects, including respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting. Inhaled methoxyflurane has been used in the pre-hospital setting for trauma-related pain. This pilot study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using methoxyflurane for pain relief during dressings changes for burns in the hospital setting. Methods: In this investigator-initiated pilot study, we included burn patients undergoing dressing changes in the burn ward. The primary outcome was the maximal pain level experienced by the patient during the procedure on a verbal rating scale of 0 to 100. Furthermore, patient satisfaction and the nurse’s assessment of the patient’s pain were reported. We also reported the presence of nausea, vomiting, coughing, and headache, along with changes in the pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and arterial blood pressure. Results: We included 12 patients in the period of June 2021 to July 2022. The median patient-reported maximal procedural pain was 60 (interquartile range (IQR), 37–80), which corresponded well with the nurse’s rating of a median of 57 (IQR 28–67). The patients were satisfied with methoxyflurane as an analgesic, with a median score of 96 (IQR 96–100). One patient reported coughing after the procedure, and another patient experienced nausea one week after the procedure. No clinically important haemodynamic changes during administration were detected. Conclusions: Methoxyflurane was found to be feasible for pain relief in burn patients undergoing dressing changes in the burn ward.","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3040047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Procedural pain in burn patients continues to be a major problem. Frequently used analgesics, such as opioids, may have various side effects, including respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting. Inhaled methoxyflurane has been used in the pre-hospital setting for trauma-related pain. This pilot study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using methoxyflurane for pain relief during dressings changes for burns in the hospital setting. Methods: In this investigator-initiated pilot study, we included burn patients undergoing dressing changes in the burn ward. The primary outcome was the maximal pain level experienced by the patient during the procedure on a verbal rating scale of 0 to 100. Furthermore, patient satisfaction and the nurse’s assessment of the patient’s pain were reported. We also reported the presence of nausea, vomiting, coughing, and headache, along with changes in the pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and arterial blood pressure. Results: We included 12 patients in the period of June 2021 to July 2022. The median patient-reported maximal procedural pain was 60 (interquartile range (IQR), 37–80), which corresponded well with the nurse’s rating of a median of 57 (IQR 28–67). The patients were satisfied with methoxyflurane as an analgesic, with a median score of 96 (IQR 96–100). One patient reported coughing after the procedure, and another patient experienced nausea one week after the procedure. No clinically important haemodynamic changes during administration were detected. Conclusions: Methoxyflurane was found to be feasible for pain relief in burn patients undergoing dressing changes in the burn ward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲氧基氟醚缓解烧伤患者程序性疼痛:一项前瞻性单中心评价研究
背景:烧伤患者的程序性疼痛仍然是一个主要问题。常用的镇痛药,如阿片类药物,可能有各种副作用,包括呼吸抑制、恶心和呕吐。吸入甲氧基氟醚已被用于院前治疗创伤性疼痛。本初步研究旨在探讨甲氧基氟醚在医院烧伤换药过程中缓解疼痛的可行性。方法:在这项由研究者发起的初步研究中,我们纳入了在烧伤病房接受换药的烧伤患者。主要结果是患者在手术过程中所经历的最大疼痛水平,以0到100的口头评分为标准。此外,报告了患者满意度和护士对患者疼痛的评估。我们还报告了恶心、呕吐、咳嗽和头痛的存在,以及脉搏率、血氧饱和度和动脉血压的变化。结果:我们在2021年6月至2022年7月期间纳入了12例患者。患者报告的最大程序性疼痛中位数为60(四分位数范围(IQR), 37-80),与护士的评分中位数57 (IQR 28-67)吻合良好。患者对甲氧基氟醚镇痛满意,中位评分为96分(IQR 96 - 100)。一名患者术后报告咳嗽,另一名患者术后一周出现恶心。在给药期间未发现临床上重要的血流动力学变化。结论:甲氧基氟醚可有效缓解烧伤病房换药患者的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Balance Impairment in the Burn Population: A Burn Model System National Database Study Resource Requirements in a Burn Mass Casualty Event Hypnosis in Burn Care: Efficacy, Applications, and Implications for Austere Settings Qualitative Descriptive Research Investigating Burn Survivors’ Perspectives on Quality of Care Aspects European Burns Association (EBA)—Summer 2024 News
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1