Short-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation or Pulsed Radiofrequency for Elderly Patients with Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Neural Plasticity Pub Date : 2022-04-27 DOI:10.1155/2022/7055697
Lei Sheng, Zihao Liu, Wang Zhou, Xiaojun Li, Xin Wang, Qingjuan Gong
{"title":"Short-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation or Pulsed Radiofrequency for Elderly Patients with Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Lei Sheng, Zihao Liu, Wang Zhou, Xiaojun Li, Xin Wang, Qingjuan Gong","doi":"10.1155/2022/7055697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common and severe complication after varicella-zoster infection, especially in elderly patients. PHN is always refractory to treatment. Both pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and short-term spinal cord stimulation (stSCS) have been used as effective analgesia methods in clinic. However, which technique could provide better pain relief remains unknown. Objectives This study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of PRF and stSCS in elderly patients with PHN. Study Design. A prospective, randomized-controlled study. Setting. Department of Pain Management, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Methods A total of 70 elderly patients with PHN were equally randomized to the PRF group or stSCS group. Patients in the PRF group received PRF treatment, while patients in the stSCS group received stSCS treatment. The primary outcome was the effective rate. The secondary outcomes included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36), and the pregabalin dosage. All outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at different postoperative time points. Results At 12 months after surgery, the effective rate reached 79.3% in stSCS group, while 42.1% in PRF group. The effective rate was significantly higher in the stSCS group than in the PRF group at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. VAS scores decreased significantly at each postoperative time point in both groups (P < 0.001). The VAS scores were significantly lower in the stSCS group than in the PRF group at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. SF-36 scores (bodily pain and the physical role) were significantly improved at each postoperative time point in both groups (P < 0.001). The SF-36 scores were significantly higher in the stSCS group than in the PRF group at some postoperative time points. The pregabalin dosage was significantly lower in the stSCS group than in the PRF group at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Limitations. A single-center study with a relatively small sample size. Conclusions Both PRF and stSCS are effective and safe neuromodulation techniques for elderly patients with PHN. However, stSCS could provide better and longer-lasting analgesic effect compared to PRF.","PeriodicalId":19122,"journal":{"name":"Neural Plasticity","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Plasticity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7055697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common and severe complication after varicella-zoster infection, especially in elderly patients. PHN is always refractory to treatment. Both pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and short-term spinal cord stimulation (stSCS) have been used as effective analgesia methods in clinic. However, which technique could provide better pain relief remains unknown. Objectives This study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of PRF and stSCS in elderly patients with PHN. Study Design. A prospective, randomized-controlled study. Setting. Department of Pain Management, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Methods A total of 70 elderly patients with PHN were equally randomized to the PRF group or stSCS group. Patients in the PRF group received PRF treatment, while patients in the stSCS group received stSCS treatment. The primary outcome was the effective rate. The secondary outcomes included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36), and the pregabalin dosage. All outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at different postoperative time points. Results At 12 months after surgery, the effective rate reached 79.3% in stSCS group, while 42.1% in PRF group. The effective rate was significantly higher in the stSCS group than in the PRF group at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. VAS scores decreased significantly at each postoperative time point in both groups (P < 0.001). The VAS scores were significantly lower in the stSCS group than in the PRF group at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. SF-36 scores (bodily pain and the physical role) were significantly improved at each postoperative time point in both groups (P < 0.001). The SF-36 scores were significantly higher in the stSCS group than in the PRF group at some postoperative time points. The pregabalin dosage was significantly lower in the stSCS group than in the PRF group at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Limitations. A single-center study with a relatively small sample size. Conclusions Both PRF and stSCS are effective and safe neuromodulation techniques for elderly patients with PHN. However, stSCS could provide better and longer-lasting analgesic effect compared to PRF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短期脊髓刺激或脉冲射频治疗老年带状疱疹后神经痛:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
背景带状疱疹后疱疹性神经痛(PHN)是水痘-带状疱疹感染后最常见和最严重的并发症,尤其是在老年患者中。PHN总是难以治疗。脉冲射频(PRF)和短期脊髓刺激(stSCS)都是临床上有效的镇痛方法。然而,哪种技术可以更好地缓解疼痛仍然是未知的。目的评价PRF和stSCS治疗老年PHN患者的疗效和安全性。研究设计。一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。设置。广州医科大学第二附属医院疼痛管理科。方法将70例老年PHN患者随机分为PRF组和stSCS组。PRF组患者接受PRF治疗,stSCS组患者接受stSCS治疗。主要观察指标为有效率。次要结果包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、36项简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)和普瑞巴林剂量。所有结果在基线和术后不同时间点进行评估。结果术后12个月,stSCS组有效率为79.3%,PRF组有效率为42.1%。术后3、6、12个月,stSCS组的有效率明显高于PRF组。两组术后各时间点VAS评分均显著降低(P < 0.001)。术后3、6、12个月,stSCS组的VAS评分明显低于PRF组。两组术后各时间点SF-36评分(躯体疼痛和躯体作用)均显著改善(P < 0.001)。术后部分时间点,stSCS组SF-36评分明显高于PRF组。术后3、6、12个月,stSCS组普瑞巴林剂量明显低于PRF组。的局限性。单中心研究,样本量相对较小。结论PRF和stSCS是治疗老年PHN患者有效、安全的神经调节技术。与PRF相比,stSCS能提供更好、更持久的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neural Plasticity
Neural Plasticity Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Neural Plasticity is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles related to all aspects of neural plasticity, with special emphasis on its functional significance as reflected in behavior and in psychopathology. Neural Plasticity publishes research and review articles from the entire range of relevant disciplines, including basic neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychology, and biological psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Modulation of High-Frequency rTMS on Reward Circuitry in Individuals with Nicotine Dependence: A Preliminary fMRI Study. Identifying ADHD-Related Abnormal Functional Connectivity with a Graph Convolutional Neural Network The Application of tDCS to Treat Pain and Psychocognitive Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review Clinical Comparison between HD-tDCS and tDCS for Improving Upper Limb Motor Function: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Trial The Alterations in the Brain Corresponding to Low Back Pain: Recent Insights and Advances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1