Teamworking in healthcare: longitudinal evaluation of a teambuilding intervention

Julie E. Bayley BSc MSc, Louise M. Wallace BSc MBA PhD C.Psychol F.B.Ps.S, Peter Spurgeon B.Sc. PhD A.B.Ps.S., Fred Barwell B.Sc. M.Sc. PhD C.Psychol, Patti Mazelan B.Sc. PhD
{"title":"Teamworking in healthcare: longitudinal evaluation of a teambuilding intervention","authors":"Julie E. Bayley BSc MSc,&nbsp;Louise M. Wallace BSc MBA PhD C.Psychol F.B.Ps.S,&nbsp;Peter Spurgeon B.Sc. PhD A.B.Ps.S.,&nbsp;Fred Barwell B.Sc. M.Sc. PhD C.Psychol,&nbsp;Patti Mazelan B.Sc. PhD","doi":"10.1111/j.1473-6861.2007.00164.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modernization of health services is a priority in the UK requiring changes in the working practices of all staff, and improved teamworking is a prerequisite of effective service delivery. This study evaluates a short teambuilding course delivered to health professionals. A longitudinal survey design was used to assess the feasibility of the course and the change in individual perceptions of team roles and team functioning, and communication skills by questionnaires immediately after the course (time 1), at 3 months (time 2) and at 6 months (time 3). Three questionnaires (Team Development Measure, Teambuilding Questionnaire and Teambuilding Questionnaire-II) were administered over this period, and telephone interviews were conducted with team members and managers at time 3. Combined results suggest that the teambuilding programme lead to an apparent slight improvement in perceived teamworking at 3 months but this had disappeared at 6 months. Although the development of individual teamworking skills is important, interventions must consider the impact of individual, team and organizational level factors on successful translation of learning into practice. Several limitations to the study are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100874,"journal":{"name":"Learning in Health and Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2007.00164.x","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning in Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2007.00164.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Modernization of health services is a priority in the UK requiring changes in the working practices of all staff, and improved teamworking is a prerequisite of effective service delivery. This study evaluates a short teambuilding course delivered to health professionals. A longitudinal survey design was used to assess the feasibility of the course and the change in individual perceptions of team roles and team functioning, and communication skills by questionnaires immediately after the course (time 1), at 3 months (time 2) and at 6 months (time 3). Three questionnaires (Team Development Measure, Teambuilding Questionnaire and Teambuilding Questionnaire-II) were administered over this period, and telephone interviews were conducted with team members and managers at time 3. Combined results suggest that the teambuilding programme lead to an apparent slight improvement in perceived teamworking at 3 months but this had disappeared at 6 months. Although the development of individual teamworking skills is important, interventions must consider the impact of individual, team and organizational level factors on successful translation of learning into practice. Several limitations to the study are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健中的团队合作:团队建设干预的纵向评估
保健服务现代化是联合王国的一项优先事项,要求改变所有工作人员的工作做法,改善团队合作是有效提供服务的先决条件。本研究评估一个短期的团队建设课程交付给卫生专业人员。采用纵向调查设计,在课程结束后立即(时间1)、3个月(时间2)和6个月(时间3)进行问卷调查,以评估课程的可行性和个人对团队角色和团队功能的看法以及沟通技巧的变化。在此期间进行了3份问卷调查(团队发展量表、团队建设问卷和团队建设问卷- ii)。并且在时间3对团队成员和经理进行了电话采访。综合结果表明,团队建设项目在3个月时对团队合作的感知有明显的轻微改善,但在6个月时就消失了。虽然个人团队合作技能的发展很重要,但干预措施必须考虑个人、团队和组织层面因素对成功将学习转化为实践的影响。讨论了本研究的几个局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experiential placements and scaffolding for reflection A qualitative evaluation of an interprofessional learning project Becoming a lecturer in nurse education: the work-place learning of clinical experts as newcomers Lost in translation: barriers to learning in health professional clinical education Undergraduate socialization in medical education: ideals of professional physicians’ practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1