Solidarity and The Ethical Turn

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES Cultural Critique Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1353/cul.2022.0049
Chad Lavin
{"title":"Solidarity and The Ethical Turn","authors":"Chad Lavin","doi":"10.1353/cul.2022.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:While politics and ethics are typically held to be distinct modes of judgment, that distinction often breaks down rather quickly in both theory and practice. This article focuses on one symptom of this breakdown: an academic trend that has been called \"the ethical turn\" in political theory. In response to social scientific approaches to politics that are seen as both too narrow and too structural, political theorists have increasingly drawn on ethical concepts that offer a promise of agency and relevance for their field. In doing so, however, contributions to the turn end up neglecting some valuable resources for theorizing politics. This article argues that solidarity, as a concept with stakes in both ethical judgment and political power, can be a useful tool for a political ethics.","PeriodicalId":46410,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Critique","volume":"4 3 1","pages":"108 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Critique","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.2022.0049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:While politics and ethics are typically held to be distinct modes of judgment, that distinction often breaks down rather quickly in both theory and practice. This article focuses on one symptom of this breakdown: an academic trend that has been called "the ethical turn" in political theory. In response to social scientific approaches to politics that are seen as both too narrow and too structural, political theorists have increasingly drawn on ethical concepts that offer a promise of agency and relevance for their field. In doing so, however, contributions to the turn end up neglecting some valuable resources for theorizing politics. This article argues that solidarity, as a concept with stakes in both ethical judgment and political power, can be a useful tool for a political ethics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团结与伦理转向
摘要:虽然政治和伦理通常被认为是不同的判断模式,但这种区别在理论和实践中往往很快就会被打破。本文关注的是这种崩溃的一个症状:一种在政治理论中被称为“伦理转向”的学术趋势。社会科学研究政治的方法被认为过于狭隘和过于结构性,为了应对这种情况,政治理论家越来越多地利用伦理概念,这些概念为他们的领域提供了一种代理和相关性的承诺。然而,在这样做的过程中,对这种转变的贡献最终忽视了一些理论化政治的宝贵资源。本文认为,团结作为一个与伦理判断和政治权力都有利害关系的概念,可以成为政治伦理的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Critique
Cultural Critique Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Cultural Critique provides a forum for international and interdisciplinary explorations of intellectual controversies, trends, and issues in culture, theory, and politics. Emphasizing critique rather than criticism, the journal draws on the diverse and conflictual approaches of Marxism, feminism, psychoanalysis, semiotics, political economy, and hermeneutics to offer readings in society and its transformation.
期刊最新文献
The Haunting Image of the Frozen Jew (in Christian Self-Understanding), the Self-Determining Universality of Human Reason, and Anticipating the Secular-Nation-State: From Hobbes to Kant and Beyond Literature Now and Democracy to Come: Jacques Derrida, Ben Lerner, and Leaving the Atocha Station The Con and the Primal Horde A Political Theology of Interpellation: On Subjection, Individuation, and Becoming Nothing Implicit Possibility: Stupidity and Sport "Without Qualities"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1