Viewing the world through Lucy Corin’s “Eyes of Dogs”

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Frontiers of Narrative Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-12 DOI:10.1515/fns-2020-0013
Nathan D. Frank
{"title":"Viewing the world through Lucy Corin’s “Eyes of Dogs”","authors":"Nathan D. Frank","doi":"10.1515/fns-2020-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Marie-Laure Ryan, Kenneth Foote, and Maoz Azaryahu pave the way, in Narrating Space/Spatializing Narrative (2016), to think of space in narrative as well as narrative in space. I steer their approach through nonhuman space by examining a narrative traversal of “the mesh,” which is Timothy Morton’s spatial metaphor for human and nonhuman interconnection. “A narrative traversal of the mesh” indicates two distinct aspects of narrative motion, which can be thought of as the motion that occurs within a narrative’s fictional spaces (internal), and as the movement of a narrative through the non-fictional spaces of the mesh (external). A narrative’s internal and external motions suggest that a narrative text is itself an enmeshed pocket of nonhuman space that emulates the meshiness of the space that envelops it. The outcome of each “narrative traversal” is that the text purports to become the mesh, but this outcome registers on two scales – that of the storyworld containing a fictional mesh (the internal scale), and that of the actual, non-fictional mesh containing the storyworld (the external scale). Remarkably, each type of traversal relies on and influences the other, so that the tandem dynamism that obtains between them emerges as my object of inquiry more so than either of them individually. Since a narrative’s spatial situation is precisely that of one nonhuman space within the larger mesh, my reading of Lucy Corin’s short story, “Eyes of Dogs,” engages ultimately with the scalar discrepancy between text and world and concludes that narrative may serve as an extramental shelter from correlationism.","PeriodicalId":29849,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Narrative Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Narrative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fns-2020-0013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Marie-Laure Ryan, Kenneth Foote, and Maoz Azaryahu pave the way, in Narrating Space/Spatializing Narrative (2016), to think of space in narrative as well as narrative in space. I steer their approach through nonhuman space by examining a narrative traversal of “the mesh,” which is Timothy Morton’s spatial metaphor for human and nonhuman interconnection. “A narrative traversal of the mesh” indicates two distinct aspects of narrative motion, which can be thought of as the motion that occurs within a narrative’s fictional spaces (internal), and as the movement of a narrative through the non-fictional spaces of the mesh (external). A narrative’s internal and external motions suggest that a narrative text is itself an enmeshed pocket of nonhuman space that emulates the meshiness of the space that envelops it. The outcome of each “narrative traversal” is that the text purports to become the mesh, but this outcome registers on two scales – that of the storyworld containing a fictional mesh (the internal scale), and that of the actual, non-fictional mesh containing the storyworld (the external scale). Remarkably, each type of traversal relies on and influences the other, so that the tandem dynamism that obtains between them emerges as my object of inquiry more so than either of them individually. Since a narrative’s spatial situation is precisely that of one nonhuman space within the larger mesh, my reading of Lucy Corin’s short story, “Eyes of Dogs,” engages ultimately with the scalar discrepancy between text and world and concludes that narrative may serve as an extramental shelter from correlationism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过露西·科林的“狗的眼睛”看世界
Marie-Laure Ryan、Kenneth Foote和Maoz Azaryahu在《叙事空间/空间化叙事》(2016)中为思考叙事中的空间和空间中的叙事铺平了道路。我通过考察“网格”(Timothy Morton对人类和非人类相互联系的空间隐喻)的叙事穿越,引导他们的方法进入非人类空间。“网格的叙事穿越”表明了叙事运动的两个不同方面,可以将其视为在叙事的虚构空间(内部)内发生的运动,以及通过网格的非虚构空间(外部)的叙事运动。叙事的内部和外部运动表明,叙事文本本身就是一个非人类空间的缠绕口袋,模仿包围它的空间的网状结构。每一次“叙事穿越”的结果都是文本自称成为网格,但这种结果记录在两个尺度上——一个是包含虚构网格的故事世界(内部尺度),另一个是包含故事世界的实际的、非虚构的网格(外部尺度)。值得注意的是,每一种类型的遍历都依赖并影响着另一种类型,因此,在它们之间获得的串联动力比它们中的任何一种单独的动力更成为我的研究对象。由于叙事的空间情境恰恰是更大网格中的一个非人类空间,我在阅读露西·科林(Lucy Corin)的短篇小说《狗的眼睛》(Eyes of Dogs)时,最终关注的是文本与世界之间的标量差异,并得出结论,叙事可以作为一种外部庇护所,免受相关主义的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Joseph Conrad’s reluctant raconteurs Horizontal metalepsis in narrative fiction Explaining the innovation dichotomy: the contexts, contents, conflicts, and compromises of innovation stories Audience-authored paratexts: legitimation of online discourse about Game of Thrones Figures of discourse in prose fiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1