{"title":"La defensa y el desarrollo del principio de independencia judicial en la Unión Europea","authors":"Adam Krzywon","doi":"10.18042/cepc/redc.119.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEl objeto del estudio en el presente articulo es la vision general de independencia judicial en la UE y los mecanismos de su defensa. Se analizan tanto las vias de proteccion de este principio como su desarrollo y contenido sustancial en el contexto de la reciente jurisprudencia del TJUE sobre el estatus del Poder Judicial en Polonia. En la primera parte del articulo se explican los instrumentos (de caracter politico y juridico) disponibles para garantizar la independencia judicial en la UE. El objetivo es demostrar como el procedimiento del art. 7 TUE, las cuestiones prejudiciales (art. 267 TFUE) y los recursos de incumplimiento (art. 258 TFUE) incrementan la exigibilidad de la independencia judicial en el espacio juridico europeo. En la segunda parte, el objeto de estudio es el mismo concepto de la independencia judicial y las garantias detalladas en este campo en la ultima jurisprudencia, incluyendo reglas para los nombramientos judiciales, el regimen de la jubilacion, la responsabilidad disciplinaria y la remuneracion. EnglishThe purpose of this article is the general vision of judicial independence in the EU and its defence mechanisms. The article analyses the ways of the protection of this principle, as well as its development and substantial content in the context of the recent CJEU jurisprudence on the status of the judiciary in Poland. The first part of the article explains the techniques (of a political and legal nature) to guarantee judicial independence in the EU. The objective is to demonstrate how the procedure based on the Article 7 TEU, as well as the preliminary rulings (Article 267 TFEU) and infringement procedures (Article 258 TFEU) increment the enforceability of judicial independence. In the second part the article develops the concept of judicial independence and the detailed guarantees in this field, including rules for judicial appointments, the retirement regime, disciplinary responsibility and remuneration.","PeriodicalId":51707,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Derecho Constitucional","volume":"27 1","pages":"85-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Derecho Constitucional","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/redc.119.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
espanolEl objeto del estudio en el presente articulo es la vision general de independencia judicial en la UE y los mecanismos de su defensa. Se analizan tanto las vias de proteccion de este principio como su desarrollo y contenido sustancial en el contexto de la reciente jurisprudencia del TJUE sobre el estatus del Poder Judicial en Polonia. En la primera parte del articulo se explican los instrumentos (de caracter politico y juridico) disponibles para garantizar la independencia judicial en la UE. El objetivo es demostrar como el procedimiento del art. 7 TUE, las cuestiones prejudiciales (art. 267 TFUE) y los recursos de incumplimiento (art. 258 TFUE) incrementan la exigibilidad de la independencia judicial en el espacio juridico europeo. En la segunda parte, el objeto de estudio es el mismo concepto de la independencia judicial y las garantias detalladas en este campo en la ultima jurisprudencia, incluyendo reglas para los nombramientos judiciales, el regimen de la jubilacion, la responsabilidad disciplinaria y la remuneracion. EnglishThe purpose of this article is the general vision of judicial independence in the EU and its defence mechanisms. The article analyses the ways of the protection of this principle, as well as its development and substantial content in the context of the recent CJEU jurisprudence on the status of the judiciary in Poland. The first part of the article explains the techniques (of a political and legal nature) to guarantee judicial independence in the EU. The objective is to demonstrate how the procedure based on the Article 7 TEU, as well as the preliminary rulings (Article 267 TFEU) and infringement procedures (Article 258 TFEU) increment the enforceability of judicial independence. In the second part the article develops the concept of judicial independence and the detailed guarantees in this field, including rules for judicial appointments, the retirement regime, disciplinary responsibility and remuneration.