Patient Experiences of Victimization during Mandatory Psychiatric Treatment: A Qualitative Study

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI:10.1080/24732850.2022.2051662
N. Verstegen, N. Peters-Scheffer, Prof. Dr. Robert Didden, Prof. Dr. Henk Nijman, Prof. Dr. Vivienne de Vogel
{"title":"Patient Experiences of Victimization during Mandatory Psychiatric Treatment: A Qualitative Study","authors":"N. Verstegen, N. Peters-Scheffer, Prof. Dr. Robert Didden, Prof. Dr. Henk Nijman, Prof. Dr. Vivienne de Vogel","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2022.2051662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forensic psychiatric inpatients are frequently exposed to aggression from fellow patients during their treatment, but research on how this impacts patients’ well-being and treatment progress is lacking. In this study, we interviewed nine patients on their experiences of victimization during mandatory psychiatric treatment. The interviews were analyzed using a Grounded Theory approach combined with elements from Consensual Qualitative Research and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Three main themes emerged from the data, namely situational descriptives, intraperso-nal and interpersonal consequences. Patients were not only exposed to both physical violence and verbal aggression by other patients, but also to a more ubiquitous flow of micro-aggressive comments. Options to escape these situations were limited. This means that victimization processes, which for most patients started much earlier in life, continue during forensic psychiatric treatment. Intrapersonal consequences include fear, hypervigilance, reactive aggression, flashbacks and avoidance and withdrawal. Interpersonal consequences include increased power differences between patients and adverse treatment consequences, such as difficulties with self-esteem. Victimization processes are not always timely noticed in an environment that focuses on risks and treat-ment of delinquent behavior. A higher level of trauma sensitivity in forensic mental health care is thus required. Recommendations for the implementation of trauma informed care are provided.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2022.2051662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Forensic psychiatric inpatients are frequently exposed to aggression from fellow patients during their treatment, but research on how this impacts patients’ well-being and treatment progress is lacking. In this study, we interviewed nine patients on their experiences of victimization during mandatory psychiatric treatment. The interviews were analyzed using a Grounded Theory approach combined with elements from Consensual Qualitative Research and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Three main themes emerged from the data, namely situational descriptives, intraperso-nal and interpersonal consequences. Patients were not only exposed to both physical violence and verbal aggression by other patients, but also to a more ubiquitous flow of micro-aggressive comments. Options to escape these situations were limited. This means that victimization processes, which for most patients started much earlier in life, continue during forensic psychiatric treatment. Intrapersonal consequences include fear, hypervigilance, reactive aggression, flashbacks and avoidance and withdrawal. Interpersonal consequences include increased power differences between patients and adverse treatment consequences, such as difficulties with self-esteem. Victimization processes are not always timely noticed in an environment that focuses on risks and treat-ment of delinquent behavior. A higher level of trauma sensitivity in forensic mental health care is thus required. Recommendations for the implementation of trauma informed care are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神科强制治疗中患者受害经历:一项质性研究
法医精神科住院患者在治疗过程中经常受到其他患者的攻击,但缺乏关于这种攻击如何影响患者福祉和治疗进展的研究。在这项研究中,我们采访了9名患者在强制精神治疗期间的受害经历。访谈采用扎根理论方法,结合共识定性研究和解释性现象学分析的元素进行分析。从数据中出现了三个主要主题,即情景描述、内部和人际后果。患者不仅会受到其他患者的身体暴力和言语攻击,还会受到更普遍的微攻击性评论。逃避这些情况的选择有限。这意味着受害的过程,对大多数病人来说在生命的早期就开始了,在法医精神病治疗期间仍在继续。对个人的影响包括恐惧、过度警惕、反应性攻击、闪回、回避和退缩。人际关系后果包括患者之间权力差异的增加和不良治疗后果,如自尊困难。受害过程并不总是及时注意到的环境,重点是风险和处理犯罪行为。因此,需要在法医心理保健中提高对创伤的敏感度。提供了实施创伤知情护理的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Good Lives Model Among Students: The Role of Primary Goods and Self-Regulation in Achieving a Good Life An Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Paraphilic Interests and Disorders Scale Use of the HCR-20 Version 3 with Women: A Narrative Synthesis Forensic Doctorate Trainee Views on an Expert by Experience (EbE)-Led Workshop: A Qualitative Exploration of Trainee Reflections Institutional Child Abuse: The Role of Disclosure, Risk, and Protective Factors in Understanding Trauma Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1