{"title":"Creditors’ interests still carry the day in business rescue: Swart v Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd 2011(5) SA 422 (GNP)","authors":"Edith Mbiriri","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2014.059075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Companies Act 71 of 2008 introduced a new business rescue regime into South African corporate law. Business rescue is a procedure that facilitates the rehabilitation of a financially distressed company. The business rescue regime is debtor-friendly and replaced the judicial management which was creditor-friendly and which proved to have been inadequate and ineffective in rescuing companies experiencing financial difficulties. The case of Swart v Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd is significant as it was the first case dealing with the business rescue provisions. The court had to consider the requirements for commencing business rescue and looked to the judicial management provisions for assistance. The study focuses on the decision of the court and its reliance on judicial management despite the two regimes having different emphasis in terms of the interests of the stakeholders and the requirements for commencing the business rescue procedure as set out in the Companies Act.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"33 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.059075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The Companies Act 71 of 2008 introduced a new business rescue regime into South African corporate law. Business rescue is a procedure that facilitates the rehabilitation of a financially distressed company. The business rescue regime is debtor-friendly and replaced the judicial management which was creditor-friendly and which proved to have been inadequate and ineffective in rescuing companies experiencing financial difficulties. The case of Swart v Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd is significant as it was the first case dealing with the business rescue provisions. The court had to consider the requirements for commencing business rescue and looked to the judicial management provisions for assistance. The study focuses on the decision of the court and its reliance on judicial management despite the two regimes having different emphasis in terms of the interests of the stakeholders and the requirements for commencing the business rescue procedure as set out in the Companies Act.
在商业救助中,债权人的利益仍然占上风:斯瓦特诉Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd 2011(5) SA 422 (GNP)
2008年颁布的第71号公司法在南非公司法中引入了一项新的商业救助制度。企业救助是一种帮助陷入财务困境的公司恢复元气的程序。企业救助制度是对债务人友好的,取代了对债权人友好的司法管理制度,而司法管理制度在救助遇到财务困难的公司方面证明是不充分和无效的。Swart v Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd的案例意义重大,因为它是处理商业救助条款的第一个案例。法院必须考虑开始企业救助的要求,并寻求司法管理规定的协助。该研究侧重于法院的决定及其对司法管理的依赖,尽管两种制度在利益相关者的利益和《公司法》中规定的启动商业救助程序的要求方面有不同的重点。