Prognostic impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by phase analysis: a CZT study.

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice Pub Date : 2023-06-19 eCollection Date: 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjimp/qyad004
Riccardo Liga, Umberto Startari, Davide Spatafora, Erica Michelotti, Alessia Gimelli
{"title":"Prognostic impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by phase analysis: a CZT study.","authors":"Riccardo Liga, Umberto Startari, Davide Spatafora, Erica Michelotti, Alessia Gimelli","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyad004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate whether phase analysis imaging may predict treatment response and long-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Sixty-nine patients underwent myocardial perfusion imaging followed by CRT. Patients with ischaemic heart disease and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) were identified. Left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) was assessed at phase analysis and the region of the latest mechanical activation was identified. LV pacing lead position was considered 'concordant' when located in the region of the latest mechanical activation, and 'discordant' otherwise. The '6 months post-CRT'/'baseline' ratio of LV ejection fraction was computed as a measure of CRT response. LVMD was revealed in 47/69 patients, 27 of whom (57%) had a concordant LV lead implantation. Only concordant pacing was associated with LV functional improvement (ejection fraction ratio: 1.28 ± 0.25 vs. 1.11 ± 0.32 in discordant stimulation, <i>P</i> = 0.028). However, this relationship persisted only in patients with NICM (<i>P</i> < 0.001), while it disappeared in those with ischaemic heart disease (<i>P</i> = NS). Twenty-eight events occurred during 30 ± 21 months follow-up. While discordant LV lead location was the major predictor of unfavourable prognosis (hazard ratio 3.29, 95% confidence interval 1.25-8.72; <i>P</i> = 0.016), this relationship was confirmed only in patients with NICM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Phase analysis of myocardial perfusion imaging may guide CRT implantation, identifying patients who would most likely benefit from this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyad004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate whether phase analysis imaging may predict treatment response and long-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods and results: Sixty-nine patients underwent myocardial perfusion imaging followed by CRT. Patients with ischaemic heart disease and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) were identified. Left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) was assessed at phase analysis and the region of the latest mechanical activation was identified. LV pacing lead position was considered 'concordant' when located in the region of the latest mechanical activation, and 'discordant' otherwise. The '6 months post-CRT'/'baseline' ratio of LV ejection fraction was computed as a measure of CRT response. LVMD was revealed in 47/69 patients, 27 of whom (57%) had a concordant LV lead implantation. Only concordant pacing was associated with LV functional improvement (ejection fraction ratio: 1.28 ± 0.25 vs. 1.11 ± 0.32 in discordant stimulation, P = 0.028). However, this relationship persisted only in patients with NICM (P < 0.001), while it disappeared in those with ischaemic heart disease (P = NS). Twenty-eight events occurred during 30 ± 21 months follow-up. While discordant LV lead location was the major predictor of unfavourable prognosis (hazard ratio 3.29, 95% confidence interval 1.25-8.72; P = 0.016), this relationship was confirmed only in patients with NICM.

Conclusions: Phase analysis of myocardial perfusion imaging may guide CRT implantation, identifying patients who would most likely benefit from this procedure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相位分析指导下的心脏再同步化疗法的预后影响:CZT 研究。
目的:评估相位分析成像能否预测心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)后的治疗反应和长期预后:69名患者接受了心肌灌注成像,随后进行了CRT治疗。确定了缺血性心脏病和非缺血性心肌病(NICM)患者。相位分析评估了左心室机械不同步(LVMD),并确定了最新机械激活区域。如果左心室起搏导联位置位于最新机械激活区域,则视为 "一致",否则视为 "不一致"。计算 "CRT 术后 6 个月"/"基线 "左心室射血分数比值,作为衡量 CRT 反应的指标。47/69 例患者显示出 LVMD,其中 27 例(57%)植入了一致的左心室导联。只有一致起搏与左心室功能改善有关(射血分数比:1.28 ± 0.25 vs. 不一致刺激为 1.11 ± 0.32,P = 0.028)。然而,这种关系仅在 NICM 患者中持续存在(P < 0.001),而在缺血性心脏病患者中则消失了(P = NS)。在 30 ± 21 个月的随访期间,共发生了 28 起事件。虽然左心室导联位置不一致是预后不良的主要预测因素(危险比为3.29,95%置信区间为1.25-8.72;P = 0.016),但这种关系仅在NICM患者中得到证实:结论:心肌灌注成像的相位分析可为 CRT 植入术提供指导,识别出最有可能从该手术中获益的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Haemodynamic significance of extrinsic outflow graft stenoses during HeartMate 3™ therapy. Virtual occlusive artery in endovascular therapy for superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusion. Imaging-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy lead placement in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Current use of echocardiography in cardio-oncology: nationwide real-world data from an ANMCO/SIECVI joint survey. Ocular blood flow dynamics following sinus rhythm restoration through catheter ablation: laser speckle flowgraphy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1