Representations of phonological changes in goat and /r/ in the Collection of Nineteenth-century Grammars (CNG)

Marco Wiemann
{"title":"Representations of phonological changes in goat and /r/ in the Collection of Nineteenth-century Grammars (CNG)","authors":"Marco Wiemann","doi":"10.1017/S1360674323000357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an analysis of vowels in the goat set and /r/ in the Collection of Nineteenth-century Grammars (CNG) (cf. Anderwald 2016). My central questions concern the extent to which grammarians provide evidence for early diphthongisation in goat words and for changes in the distribution of /r/ variants in nineteenth-century prestige accents. I furthermore evaluate how far grammars are suitable as a source for researching historical sound changes. I show that monophthongs are the most frequently proposed variants for goat and are often referred to as ‘improper diphthongs’. Some diphthongal descriptions exist for words in open syllables, before /l/ and before plosives in words like know, soul and boat respectively. Concerning the distribution of /r/, I show that most grammars continued to propose two sounds, which were almost exclusively described as ‘rough’ or ‘trilled’, and ‘smooth’ or ‘soft’. However, some grammarians also argued for /r/ having only one sound in all positions and complete post-vocalic /r/ absence. Overall, the grammars in the CNG display a considerable amount of what I assume to be copying from scholars such as Walker (1791) and Murray (1795). Thus, I argue that great care is required when attempting to infer phonological changes from nineteenth-century grammars.","PeriodicalId":36216,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674323000357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of vowels in the goat set and /r/ in the Collection of Nineteenth-century Grammars (CNG) (cf. Anderwald 2016). My central questions concern the extent to which grammarians provide evidence for early diphthongisation in goat words and for changes in the distribution of /r/ variants in nineteenth-century prestige accents. I furthermore evaluate how far grammars are suitable as a source for researching historical sound changes. I show that monophthongs are the most frequently proposed variants for goat and are often referred to as ‘improper diphthongs’. Some diphthongal descriptions exist for words in open syllables, before /l/ and before plosives in words like know, soul and boat respectively. Concerning the distribution of /r/, I show that most grammars continued to propose two sounds, which were almost exclusively described as ‘rough’ or ‘trilled’, and ‘smooth’ or ‘soft’. However, some grammarians also argued for /r/ having only one sound in all positions and complete post-vocalic /r/ absence. Overall, the grammars in the CNG display a considerable amount of what I assume to be copying from scholars such as Walker (1791) and Murray (1795). Thus, I argue that great care is required when attempting to infer phonological changes from nineteenth-century grammars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《19世纪语法集》中goat和/r/音位变化的表征
本文分析了《19世纪语法集》(CNG)中goat集合和/r/中的元音(cf. Anderwald 2016)。我的核心问题是,语法学家在多大程度上提供了山羊词早期双元音化的证据,以及19世纪声望口音中/r/变体分布的变化。我进一步评估了语法在多大程度上适合作为研究历史声音变化的来源。我发现单元音是goat最常见的变体,通常被称为“不恰当的双元音”。一些双元音描述存在于开放音节的单词中,在/l/之前和在know、soul和boat等单词的爆破音之前。关于/r/的分布,我表明,大多数语法继续提出两种声音,几乎完全被描述为“粗糙”或“颤音”,以及“光滑”或“柔软”。然而,一些语法学家也认为/r/在所有位置只有一个音,而完全没有后元音/r/。总的来说,CNG中的语法显示了相当多的我认为是从Walker(1791)和Murray(1795)等学者那里抄袭来的东西。因此,我认为,当试图从19世纪的语法中推断语音变化时,需要非常小心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
John Considine, Sixteenth-century English dictionaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. Pp. xiv + 496. ISBN 9780198832287. Elisa Mattiello, Transitional morphology: Combining forms in modern English (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. Pp. v + 238. ISBN 9781009168281. Epistemic phrases and adolescent speech in West London ‘Well, taakin about he da bring inta me yead wat I promised var ta tell ee about’: representations of south-western speech in nineteenth-century dialect writing Speech reflections in Late Modern English pauper letters from Dorset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1