Efficacy of 3 Monthly versus Monthly Zoledronic Acid on Bone Metastasis

E. Qasem, Y. Dorgham, Seham Mohammed Elhagrasy, Nashwa Nawar, Ahmed Z. Al Attar
{"title":"Efficacy of 3 Monthly versus Monthly Zoledronic Acid on Bone Metastasis","authors":"E. Qasem, Y. Dorgham, Seham Mohammed Elhagrasy, Nashwa Nawar, Ahmed Z. Al Attar","doi":"10.1177/03008916211012338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bone metastatic disease affect a patient’s quality of life. Aim: Evaluating possible stratification factors affecting the efficacy of different schedules of zoledronic acid on SREs. Patients and Methods: A randomized, clinical trial at Zagazig university hospitals. 108 Patients were enrolled to receive zoledronic acid 4 mg (A and B groups=12 and 4 weeks, respectively) for 2 years. Results: Regarding age, tumour type, types of bone metastasis and number of bone metastasis, there was an insignificant difference between both groups. However, 3 monthly regimen of zoledronic acid gave better results in solitary than multiple bone metastases. Regarding pretreatment ECOG, there was an insignificant difference between between both groups. However, 3 monthly regimen of zoledronic acid gave better results in pre-treatment ECOG 1and ECOG 2 than ECOG 3. Conclusion: A 3-monthly regimen of zoledronic acid is more effective in management of solitary or few sites of bone metastasis, osteoblastic bony lesions and patients with good performance status. Recommendations: We recommend a larger sample size and the study should include a homogenous groups of patients so we can judge well on different stratifications factors that can affect efficacy of 3- monthly regimen of zoledronic acid.","PeriodicalId":23450,"journal":{"name":"Tumori Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"9 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916211012338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bone metastatic disease affect a patient’s quality of life. Aim: Evaluating possible stratification factors affecting the efficacy of different schedules of zoledronic acid on SREs. Patients and Methods: A randomized, clinical trial at Zagazig university hospitals. 108 Patients were enrolled to receive zoledronic acid 4 mg (A and B groups=12 and 4 weeks, respectively) for 2 years. Results: Regarding age, tumour type, types of bone metastasis and number of bone metastasis, there was an insignificant difference between both groups. However, 3 monthly regimen of zoledronic acid gave better results in solitary than multiple bone metastases. Regarding pretreatment ECOG, there was an insignificant difference between between both groups. However, 3 monthly regimen of zoledronic acid gave better results in pre-treatment ECOG 1and ECOG 2 than ECOG 3. Conclusion: A 3-monthly regimen of zoledronic acid is more effective in management of solitary or few sites of bone metastasis, osteoblastic bony lesions and patients with good performance status. Recommendations: We recommend a larger sample size and the study should include a homogenous groups of patients so we can judge well on different stratifications factors that can affect efficacy of 3- monthly regimen of zoledronic acid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每月服用3次唑来膦酸与每月服用一次唑来膦酸治疗骨转移的疗效比较
背景:骨转移疾病影响患者的生活质量。目的:评价影响唑来膦酸治疗SREs疗效的分层因素。患者和方法:在扎加齐格大学医院进行的一项随机临床试验。108例患者接受唑来膦酸4mg治疗(A组和B组分别为12周和4周),为期2年。结果:两组患者在年龄、肿瘤类型、骨转移类型、骨转移数量等方面差异均无统计学意义。然而,3个月服用唑来膦酸治疗单发骨转移优于多发性骨转移。预处理ECOG两组比较差异不显著。然而,3个月的唑来膦酸治疗方案对预处理ECOG 1和ECOG 2的效果优于ECOG 3。结论:唑来膦酸3个月治疗对孤立性或少数部位骨转移、成骨细胞性骨病变及运动状态良好的患者更为有效。建议:我们建议更大的样本量,研究应该包括一个同质的患者群体,这样我们就可以很好地判断不同的分层因素,这些因素会影响3个月服用唑来膦酸的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROACT 2.0: A new open-source tool to improve patient-doctor communication in clinical trials Response to lorlatinib rechallenge in a case of ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC with a resistance mutation to second generation TKIs The digital revolution in pathology: Towards a smarter approach to research and treatment The power of art and the powers of adolescents with cancer: Age-specific projects at Italian pediatric oncology centers bgicc 2024 abstracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1