Public perception of Invisalign® clear aligner treatment: A cross-sectional survey-based study

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE APOS Trends in Orthodontics Pub Date : 2022-09-14 DOI:10.25259/apos_127_2022
N. Almotairy
{"title":"Public perception of Invisalign® clear aligner treatment: A cross-sectional survey-based study","authors":"N. Almotairy","doi":"10.25259/apos_127_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe demand for clear aligner treatment has increased in recent years. Thus, this study investigated public knowledge regarding Invisalign clear aligner treatment.\n\n\n\nA web-based survey was administered through different social media platforms covering different aspects of Invisalign treatment, namely: Treatment efficiency, patient discomfort, appliance esthetic attractiveness, oral hygiene maintenance, and treatment aesthetic results. Participants were also asked to outline their perception of Invisalign treatment cost. A Likert-type scale was used to rank the participant responses. Data were analyzed with the Chi-square test and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.\n\n\n\nOut of 934 eligible adult participants, 19.6% were aware of Invisalign. Most of the Invisalign-familiar respondents were unaware of its cost (27.9%) but agree it is generally better (49.7%), requires fewer visits (38.2%), results in shorter treatment duration (39.4%) and reduced teeth discomfort (35%), more esthetically attractive (64%), yields easier oral hygiene maintenance (55.2%), and produces superior esthetic results (43.7%) than traditional braces. In addition, males and average-income participants were more likely to believe that Invisalign treatment produces superior esthetic results than traditional braces (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.002, respectively). Average-income participants also believed that Invisalign treatment was generally better (P < 0.0001). While participants in the age-range 55–64 years strongly believe, it is cheaper (P < 0.0001) than traditional braces.\n\n\n\nThis study highlighted the lack of public knowledge about Invisalign treatment. The results also indicated the importance of ensuring public access to reliable information backed up by high-quality evidence.\n","PeriodicalId":42593,"journal":{"name":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_127_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The demand for clear aligner treatment has increased in recent years. Thus, this study investigated public knowledge regarding Invisalign clear aligner treatment. A web-based survey was administered through different social media platforms covering different aspects of Invisalign treatment, namely: Treatment efficiency, patient discomfort, appliance esthetic attractiveness, oral hygiene maintenance, and treatment aesthetic results. Participants were also asked to outline their perception of Invisalign treatment cost. A Likert-type scale was used to rank the participant responses. Data were analyzed with the Chi-square test and Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Out of 934 eligible adult participants, 19.6% were aware of Invisalign. Most of the Invisalign-familiar respondents were unaware of its cost (27.9%) but agree it is generally better (49.7%), requires fewer visits (38.2%), results in shorter treatment duration (39.4%) and reduced teeth discomfort (35%), more esthetically attractive (64%), yields easier oral hygiene maintenance (55.2%), and produces superior esthetic results (43.7%) than traditional braces. In addition, males and average-income participants were more likely to believe that Invisalign treatment produces superior esthetic results than traditional braces (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.002, respectively). Average-income participants also believed that Invisalign treatment was generally better (P < 0.0001). While participants in the age-range 55–64 years strongly believe, it is cheaper (P < 0.0001) than traditional braces. This study highlighted the lack of public knowledge about Invisalign treatment. The results also indicated the importance of ensuring public access to reliable information backed up by high-quality evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对Invisalign®透明矫正器治疗的看法:一项基于横断面调查的研究
近年来,对清洁矫正器治疗的需求有所增加。因此,本研究调查了公众对Invisalign透明矫正器治疗的认识。通过不同的社交媒体平台进行一项基于网络的调查,涵盖了Invisalign治疗的不同方面,即:治疗效率、患者不适、器械美观性、口腔卫生维护和治疗美学效果。参与者还被要求概述他们对隐形眼镜治疗费用的看法。李克特量表用于对参与者的回答进行排序。数据分析采用卡方检验和Bonferroni校正进行多重比较。在934名符合条件的成年参与者中,19.6%的人知道Invisalign。大多数熟悉隐形牙套的受访者不知道它的成本(27.9%),但认为它总体上更好(49.7%),就诊次数更少(38.2%),治疗时间更短(39.4%),牙齿不适减少(35%),更美观(64%),口腔卫生维护更容易(55.2%),美观效果优于传统牙套(43.7%)。此外,男性和平均收入的参与者更有可能相信Invisalign治疗比传统牙套产生更好的美学效果(P = 0.0002和P = 0.002分别)。平均收入的参与者也认为Invisalign治疗通常更好(P < 0.0001)。而年龄在55-64岁的参与者强烈认为,它比传统牙套更便宜(P < 0.0001)。这项研究强调了公众对隐形眼镜治疗知识的缺乏。调查结果还表明,确保公众获得有高质量证据支持的可靠信息的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
APOS Trends in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Comparison of coating stability and surface characterization of different esthetic NiTi arch wires – An in vivo study Accelerated and hybrid orthodontic treatment using a combination of 2D lingual appliance and in-house aligner: An anterior cross-bite and TMD case report after 1-year follow-up The perception of facial esthetics with regard to different buccal corridors and facial proportions Clinical effect of low-level laser therapy on pain perception after placement of initial orthodontic archwires Orthodontic treatment of a patient with pycnodysostosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1