{"title":"Numerical calculation on the seismic performance of a steel frame beam-to-column joint with welding residual stress","authors":"Longyu Cai, Wei Zhang, Z. Liu","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2021.2022448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Residual stress has almost always been an essential issue associated with welded structural steel. In this paper, thermal elastic–plastic finite element method (FEM) is adopted to calculate the welding residual stress of a steel frame beam-to-column, and then the calculated residual stress is applied to the subject as an initial condition to calculate its mechanical behaviour. Both monotonic loading and cyclic loading are designed to simulate the seismic behaviour of the structure. Bonora damage model [41–44] is used to calculate the initiation and propagation of the crack. Finally, the hysteretic curve of the structure under cyclic loading is obtained. The results show that the main component of the welding residual stress along weld fillers of the steel frame beam-to-column is longitudinal tensile stress, and the magnitude of the residual tensile stress in welding stable zone is about 1.2 times of the material yield stress. Welding residual stress mainly affects the ductility and fracture behaviour of the steel frame beam-to-column. Under monotonic loading, the drift ratio of crack initiation with welding residual stress is reduced by 9% compared with that without welding residual stress. Under cyclic loading, when welding residual stress is taken into account, the crack initiates a little earlier than when welding residual stress is not considered. Compared with monotonic loading, crack initiates much easier when the structure is subjected to cyclic loading.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2021.2022448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Residual stress has almost always been an essential issue associated with welded structural steel. In this paper, thermal elastic–plastic finite element method (FEM) is adopted to calculate the welding residual stress of a steel frame beam-to-column, and then the calculated residual stress is applied to the subject as an initial condition to calculate its mechanical behaviour. Both monotonic loading and cyclic loading are designed to simulate the seismic behaviour of the structure. Bonora damage model [41–44] is used to calculate the initiation and propagation of the crack. Finally, the hysteretic curve of the structure under cyclic loading is obtained. The results show that the main component of the welding residual stress along weld fillers of the steel frame beam-to-column is longitudinal tensile stress, and the magnitude of the residual tensile stress in welding stable zone is about 1.2 times of the material yield stress. Welding residual stress mainly affects the ductility and fracture behaviour of the steel frame beam-to-column. Under monotonic loading, the drift ratio of crack initiation with welding residual stress is reduced by 9% compared with that without welding residual stress. Under cyclic loading, when welding residual stress is taken into account, the crack initiates a little earlier than when welding residual stress is not considered. Compared with monotonic loading, crack initiates much easier when the structure is subjected to cyclic loading.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.