Theorizing the Multiplicity of Digital Phenomena: The Ecology of Configurations, Causal Recipes, and Guidelines for Applying QCA

MIS Q. Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2020/13879
Youngki Park, Peer C. Fiss, O. E. Sawy
{"title":"Theorizing the Multiplicity of Digital Phenomena: The Ecology of Configurations, Causal Recipes, and Guidelines for Applying QCA","authors":"Youngki Park, Peer C. Fiss, O. E. Sawy","doi":"10.25300/MISQ/2020/13879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faced with the challenge of multifaceted digital phenomena, researchers in IS and related fields have increasingly adopted qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). However, in the absence of explicit guidelines for how to use QCA for theory development, the popularity and proliferation of QCA possibly amplifies the risk of using QCA in an atheoretical manner, hindering theoretical advancement. In this paper, we offer a conceptual framework and prescriptive guidelines for applying QCA to develop causal recipes that account for complex digital phenomena marked by theoretical and configurational multiplicity. Causal recipes are formal statements explaining how causally relevant elements combine into configurations associated with outcomes of interest. We describe these causal recipes in terms of which causes matter (i.e., factorial logic) and how these causes combine into configurations (i.e., combinatorial logic) to produce target outcomes, and propose an ecology of configurations that elucidates the explanatory power of multiple configurations as well as their explanatory overlap. Further, we offer two illustrative empirical examples to demonstrate the usefulness of our framework and step-by-step guidelines for applying QCA to deductive theory testing as well as inductive theory development on phenomena marked by multiplicity.","PeriodicalId":18743,"journal":{"name":"MIS Q.","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIS Q.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/13879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Faced with the challenge of multifaceted digital phenomena, researchers in IS and related fields have increasingly adopted qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). However, in the absence of explicit guidelines for how to use QCA for theory development, the popularity and proliferation of QCA possibly amplifies the risk of using QCA in an atheoretical manner, hindering theoretical advancement. In this paper, we offer a conceptual framework and prescriptive guidelines for applying QCA to develop causal recipes that account for complex digital phenomena marked by theoretical and configurational multiplicity. Causal recipes are formal statements explaining how causally relevant elements combine into configurations associated with outcomes of interest. We describe these causal recipes in terms of which causes matter (i.e., factorial logic) and how these causes combine into configurations (i.e., combinatorial logic) to produce target outcomes, and propose an ecology of configurations that elucidates the explanatory power of multiple configurations as well as their explanatory overlap. Further, we offer two illustrative empirical examples to demonstrate the usefulness of our framework and step-by-step guidelines for applying QCA to deductive theory testing as well as inductive theory development on phenomena marked by multiplicity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理论化数字现象的多样性:配置生态、因果配方和应用QCA的指导方针
面对数字化现象的多面性挑战,信息系统及相关领域的研究者越来越多地采用定性比较分析(QCA)。然而,在缺乏关于如何使用QCA进行理论发展的明确指导的情况下,QCA的普及和扩散可能会放大以理论方式使用QCA的风险,阻碍理论的发展。在本文中,我们提供了一个概念框架和规范性指南,用于应用QCA开发因果配方,以解释以理论和配置多样性为标志的复杂数字现象。因果配方是解释因果相关元素如何组合成与感兴趣的结果相关的配置的正式陈述。我们根据导致物质的原因(即,析因逻辑)以及这些原因如何组合成配置(即,组合逻辑)以产生目标结果来描述这些因果配方,并提出了一个配置生态,阐明了多种配置的解释能力以及它们的解释重叠。此外,我们提供了两个说明性的经验例子,以证明我们的框架和逐步指南的实用性,用于将QCA应用于演绎理论测试以及以多样性为标志的现象的归纳理论发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unintended Emotional Effects of Online Health Communities: A Text Mining-Supported Empirical Study Understanding the Digital Resilience of Physicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study Putting Religious Bias in Context: How Offline and Online Contexts Shape Religious Bias in Online Prosocial Lending Exploiting Expert Knowledge for Assigning Firms to Industries: A Novel Deep Learning Method Attaining Individual Creativity and Performance in Multidisciplinary and Geographically Distributed IT Project Teams: The Role of Transactive Memory Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1