Serial Hemodynamic and Autonomic Changes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Relation to Outcome, Stroke Type, and Location

A. Gujjar, D. Jaju, P. Jacob, S. Ganguly, A. Al-Asmi
{"title":"Serial Hemodynamic and Autonomic Changes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Relation to Outcome, Stroke Type, and Location","authors":"A. Gujjar, D. Jaju, P. Jacob, S. Ganguly, A. Al-Asmi","doi":"10.1177/2516608520940486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hypertension and changes in autonomic functions commonly accompany the acute phase of ischemic stroke and are recognized to influence outcomes. Few studies have addressed hemodynamic and autonomic monitoring together in acute stroke. Aim: We aimed to study serial hemodynamic and cardiovascular autonomic changes among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and to explore their relation to stroke outcome, stroke type, location, and severity. Methods: Patients with AIS of <96 h duration underwent serial hemodynamic/autonomic function studies over the first 4 days of admission. Their association with stroke severity, type, location, and outcome was explored using univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients with arrhythmias, pulmonary edema, or cardiac failure were excluded. Results: Of the 55 patients (M:F::27:28; age: 62 + 12 yrs) with AIS, 33 had large artery stroke, 18-lacunar and 4-cardioembolic stroke, and 6 died. Mean blood pressure, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and cardiac output (CO) decreased over 4 days. Several hemodynamic and autonomic parameters correlated with the outcome on univariate analysis, while CO and SVR independently predicted the outcome. Stroke type was related to few hemodynamic parameters (SI, cardiac index on days 2-4). Lacunar stroke type was associated with left ventricular ejection time and low-frequency/high-frequency ratio (P < .05). Conclusion: Among patients with AIS, early sympathetic autonomic dominance may explain decreasing hemodynamic trends observed over the initial 4 days. 2 hemodynamic parameters, CO and SVR, independently predicted stroke outcome, while blood pressure did not. Further studies are indicated to explore the possibility of influencing stroke outcomes through modification of CO or SVR.","PeriodicalId":93323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of stroke medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of stroke medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516608520940486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Hypertension and changes in autonomic functions commonly accompany the acute phase of ischemic stroke and are recognized to influence outcomes. Few studies have addressed hemodynamic and autonomic monitoring together in acute stroke. Aim: We aimed to study serial hemodynamic and cardiovascular autonomic changes among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and to explore their relation to stroke outcome, stroke type, location, and severity. Methods: Patients with AIS of <96 h duration underwent serial hemodynamic/autonomic function studies over the first 4 days of admission. Their association with stroke severity, type, location, and outcome was explored using univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients with arrhythmias, pulmonary edema, or cardiac failure were excluded. Results: Of the 55 patients (M:F::27:28; age: 62 + 12 yrs) with AIS, 33 had large artery stroke, 18-lacunar and 4-cardioembolic stroke, and 6 died. Mean blood pressure, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and cardiac output (CO) decreased over 4 days. Several hemodynamic and autonomic parameters correlated with the outcome on univariate analysis, while CO and SVR independently predicted the outcome. Stroke type was related to few hemodynamic parameters (SI, cardiac index on days 2-4). Lacunar stroke type was associated with left ventricular ejection time and low-frequency/high-frequency ratio (P < .05). Conclusion: Among patients with AIS, early sympathetic autonomic dominance may explain decreasing hemodynamic trends observed over the initial 4 days. 2 hemodynamic parameters, CO and SVR, independently predicted stroke outcome, while blood pressure did not. Further studies are indicated to explore the possibility of influencing stroke outcomes through modification of CO or SVR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性缺血性卒中的一系列血流动力学和自主神经改变:与预后、卒中类型和部位的关系
背景:高血压和自主神经功能的改变通常伴随着缺血性脑卒中的急性期,并被认为会影响预后。很少有研究将血液动力学和自主神经监测一起用于急性脑卒中。目的:利用胸电生物阻抗研究急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者的一系列血液动力学和心血管自主神经变化,并探讨其与脑卒中结局、脑卒中类型、部位和严重程度的关系。方法:持续时间<96小时的AIS患者在入院前4天进行了一系列血液动力学/自主神经功能研究。使用单变量和多变量分析探讨了它们与中风严重程度、类型、部位和结局的关系。排除有心律失常、肺水肿或心力衰竭的患者。结果:55例患者中(M:F: 27:28;年龄:62 + 12岁),33例发生大动脉卒中,18例发生腔隙性卒中,4例发生心栓塞性卒中,6例死亡。平均血压、全身血管阻力(SVR)和心输出量(CO)在4天内下降。在单变量分析中,一些血流动力学和自主神经参数与结果相关,而CO和SVR独立预测结果。卒中类型与血流动力学参数(SI,第2 ~ 4天心脏指数)相关。腔隙性卒中类型与左室射血时间、低频/高频比值相关(P < 0.05)。结论:在AIS患者中,早期的交感自主神经优势可能解释了在最初4天观察到的血流动力学下降趋势。血流动力学参数CO和SVR能独立预测脑卒中的预后,而血压不能。进一步的研究表明,通过改变CO或SVR来影响脑卒中预后的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of the Correlation of Pulsatility Index by Transcranial Doppler in the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Cerebral Venous Sinus 
Thrombosis Acute Ischaemic Stroke in a Young Adult in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Report of Post-strangulation Carotid Artery Dissection The Effect of Biological Sex on a County Pre-hospital Stroke Initiative COVID and Vaccine-related Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Expert Consensus on Improving Stroke Care Ecosystem in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1