Vocational Students’ Ways of Handling the Academic/Vocational Divide

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training Pub Date : 2021-01-27 DOI:10.13152/IJRVET.8.1.1
Lisa Ferm
{"title":"Vocational Students’ Ways of Handling the Academic/Vocational Divide","authors":"Lisa Ferm","doi":"10.13152/IJRVET.8.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The focus of this article is on Swedish vocational students’ own thoughts about different types of knowledge and how these thoughts relate to the forming of their vocational identities. The article reports on a study which investigates how vocational students handle the division between theoretical and practical knowledge as they learn to become skilled industrial workers. Theoretical and practical knowledge are often presented as dichotomies in a hierarchy, where theoretical knowledge is more highly valued than practical knowledge. The division between theoretical and practical knowledge is known in research as \"the academic/vocational divide\". This divide is particularly relevant to vocational students, as they need to deal with both types of knowledge as they navigate between the contexts of school and work.Methods: This study is part of a research project on vocational students’ learning and identity formation. The empirical material is based on qualitative interviews with 44 students enrolled on the industrial programme at Swedish upper secondary schools.Findings: The study revealed three different ways in which vocational students handled the academic/vocational divide: Placing higher value on practical knowledge than on theoretical knowledge, reinforcing the separation between school and work, and selecting theoretical subjects as useful tools for the future. Conclusions: Two conclusions drawn from the study are that students are aware of the status differences and divisions between practical and theoretical knowledge, and that they handle the academic/vocational divide in an active manner. Students make choices that will help them form a vocational identity or that will give them opportunities for further education and alternative careers. This article challenges and contradicts the image of vocational students as unmotivated and unintellectual, instead portraying them as knowledgeable actors who make strategic choices for their future and are active in forming vocational identities within vocations that require deep and advanced knowledge. ","PeriodicalId":37080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.8.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose: The focus of this article is on Swedish vocational students’ own thoughts about different types of knowledge and how these thoughts relate to the forming of their vocational identities. The article reports on a study which investigates how vocational students handle the division between theoretical and practical knowledge as they learn to become skilled industrial workers. Theoretical and practical knowledge are often presented as dichotomies in a hierarchy, where theoretical knowledge is more highly valued than practical knowledge. The division between theoretical and practical knowledge is known in research as "the academic/vocational divide". This divide is particularly relevant to vocational students, as they need to deal with both types of knowledge as they navigate between the contexts of school and work.Methods: This study is part of a research project on vocational students’ learning and identity formation. The empirical material is based on qualitative interviews with 44 students enrolled on the industrial programme at Swedish upper secondary schools.Findings: The study revealed three different ways in which vocational students handled the academic/vocational divide: Placing higher value on practical knowledge than on theoretical knowledge, reinforcing the separation between school and work, and selecting theoretical subjects as useful tools for the future. Conclusions: Two conclusions drawn from the study are that students are aware of the status differences and divisions between practical and theoretical knowledge, and that they handle the academic/vocational divide in an active manner. Students make choices that will help them form a vocational identity or that will give them opportunities for further education and alternative careers. This article challenges and contradicts the image of vocational students as unmotivated and unintellectual, instead portraying them as knowledgeable actors who make strategic choices for their future and are active in forming vocational identities within vocations that require deep and advanced knowledge. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高职学生处理学职分化的方法
目的:本文的重点是瑞典职校学生对不同类型知识的思考,以及这些思考与他们职业认同形成的关系。本文报道了一项关于高职学生在学习成为技术产业工人的过程中如何处理理论知识和实践知识的划分的研究。理论知识和实践知识通常在层次结构中表现为二分法,理论知识比实践知识更受重视。理论知识和实践知识之间的鸿沟在研究中被称为“学术/职业鸿沟”。这种差异与职业学生尤其相关,因为他们在学校和工作环境之间游走时需要处理这两种类型的知识。方法:本研究是高职学生学习与认同形成研究项目的一部分。实证材料基于对瑞典高中工业课程注册的44名学生的定性访谈。研究发现:中职学生处理学术/职业分化的三种不同方式:重视实践知识而不是理论知识;加强学校与工作的分离;选择理论科目作为未来的有用工具。结论:研究得出两个结论:学生意识到实际知识和理论知识之间的地位差异和划分,他们以积极的态度处理学术/职业的划分。学生做出的选择将帮助他们形成职业身份,或者将给他们进一步教育和替代职业的机会。这篇文章挑战并反驳了高职学生缺乏动力和智力的形象,而是将他们描绘成知识渊博的演员,他们为自己的未来做出战略选择,并在需要深入和先进知识的职业中积极形成职业身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Employee Training Policies of High Revenue Companies: Analysis of Case Examples From Türkiye The Role of VET in a Green Transition of Industry: A Literature Review Challenges, Future and Policy Orientations: The 1960s−1970s as Decisive Years for Swiss Vocational Education and Training The Influence of Innovative Characteristics, Work Readiness, and Vocational Self-Concept on Employability of Vocational College Students Teacher's Agency and the Cooperation With Entrepreneurs in Entrepreneurship Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1