Could therapists, their supervisors and their professional bodies do more to protect the public?

IF 0.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1080/13642537.2023.2241327
D. Loewenthal
{"title":"Could therapists, their supervisors and their professional bodies do more to protect the public?","authors":"D. Loewenthal","doi":"10.1080/13642537.2023.2241327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To be more specific, this editorial ventures, somewhat audaciously, to consider whether psychotherapists, counsellors, psychoanalysts, arts and play therapists, psychologists, their supervisors, their trainers/educators and their professional bodies could do more to protect the public. When I started my psychotherapy training, many other trainees appeared to have already been there for around 10 years. I, whilst having already successfully completed a 3-year diploma in counselling, was to take much longer. Now I would agree that I was probably a more difficult ‘case’ than most, but would I currently be shown that – given therapeutic training today, or would I ‘get away with it’ to both my clients’ and my detriment? In the case of the UK, it is now possible to advertise as a psychotherapist on the main sites that the public uses to access therapy after 1-year full-time training or 2-year part-time training, appearing to be fully qualified. Furthermore, an increasing number of even 4-year part-time trainings do not require the trainee to go to the expense, time, and potential emotional furore, of having personal therapy. Let alone the questions of how many times a week and whether such personal therapy is at least throughout the training. The potential client is faced with the confusing complexity of professional labels, for example, MBACP (registered) and MBACP (accredited), psychotherapist, psychotherapeutic counsellor, psychoanalytic psychotherapist, psychodynamic psychotherapist, psychoanalyst, practitioner psychologist, clinical psychologist, counselling psychologist, and so on. There seems little in the way of help provided, particularly by referral websites, for somebody who is likely to be in distress in the first place to understand all these different titles and labels (let alone to then go into looking at choosing a modality). Furthermore , this lack of clarity over therapeutic professional labels is not just a problem for potential clients, for in my experience most health service professionals, who might advise the client, are also unlikely to be clear. I previously ran CPD programmes for general practitioners who seem to have little clue about these differences – so what chance has the general public? EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY & COUNSELLING 2023, VOL. 25, NO. 3, 219–231 https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2023.2241327","PeriodicalId":44564,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","volume":"103 1","pages":"219 - 231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2023.2241327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To be more specific, this editorial ventures, somewhat audaciously, to consider whether psychotherapists, counsellors, psychoanalysts, arts and play therapists, psychologists, their supervisors, their trainers/educators and their professional bodies could do more to protect the public. When I started my psychotherapy training, many other trainees appeared to have already been there for around 10 years. I, whilst having already successfully completed a 3-year diploma in counselling, was to take much longer. Now I would agree that I was probably a more difficult ‘case’ than most, but would I currently be shown that – given therapeutic training today, or would I ‘get away with it’ to both my clients’ and my detriment? In the case of the UK, it is now possible to advertise as a psychotherapist on the main sites that the public uses to access therapy after 1-year full-time training or 2-year part-time training, appearing to be fully qualified. Furthermore, an increasing number of even 4-year part-time trainings do not require the trainee to go to the expense, time, and potential emotional furore, of having personal therapy. Let alone the questions of how many times a week and whether such personal therapy is at least throughout the training. The potential client is faced with the confusing complexity of professional labels, for example, MBACP (registered) and MBACP (accredited), psychotherapist, psychotherapeutic counsellor, psychoanalytic psychotherapist, psychodynamic psychotherapist, psychoanalyst, practitioner psychologist, clinical psychologist, counselling psychologist, and so on. There seems little in the way of help provided, particularly by referral websites, for somebody who is likely to be in distress in the first place to understand all these different titles and labels (let alone to then go into looking at choosing a modality). Furthermore , this lack of clarity over therapeutic professional labels is not just a problem for potential clients, for in my experience most health service professionals, who might advise the client, are also unlikely to be clear. I previously ran CPD programmes for general practitioners who seem to have little clue about these differences – so what chance has the general public? EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY & COUNSELLING 2023, VOL. 25, NO. 3, 219–231 https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2023.2241327
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗师、他们的主管和他们的专业团体能做更多的事情来保护公众吗?
更具体地说,这篇社论大胆地考虑了心理治疗师、咨询师、精神分析学家、艺术和游戏治疗师、心理学家、他们的主管、他们的培训师/教育者和他们的专业机构是否可以做更多的事情来保护公众。当我开始接受心理治疗培训时,许多学员似乎已经在那里工作了10年左右。我虽然已经成功地完成了3年的咨询文凭,但要花更长的时间。现在我同意,我可能是一个比大多数人更困难的“案例”,但我现在是否会被证明-给予今天的治疗培训,或者我是否会对我的客户和我的损害都“侥幸逃脱”?以英国为例,现在可以在公众使用的主要网站上做心理治疗师的广告,这些网站在经过1年的全职培训或2年的兼职培训后,看起来是完全合格的。此外,越来越多的4年兼职培训甚至不需要学员花费金钱、时间和潜在的情绪愤怒来进行个人治疗。更不用说每周多少次以及这种个人治疗是否至少贯穿整个培训过程的问题了。潜在的客户面临着令人困惑的专业标签的复杂性,例如,MBACP(注册)和MBACP(认证),心理治疗师,心理治疗咨询师,精神分析心理治疗师,精神动力心理治疗师,精神分析学家,执业心理学家,临床心理学家,咨询心理学家等等。对于那些一开始就可能陷入困境的人来说,提供帮助的方式似乎很少,尤其是通过推荐网站,他们很难理解所有这些不同的标题和标签(更不用说选择一种方式了)。此外,缺乏明确的治疗专业标签不仅是潜在客户的问题,因为根据我的经验,大多数可能给客户提供建议的健康服务专业人员也不太可能清楚。我以前为全科医生开办了持续专业进修课程,他们似乎对这些差异一无所知——那么普通公众有什么机会呢?欧洲心理治疗与咨询杂志2023,第25卷,第25期。3, 219-231 https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2023.2241327
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Travelling in time: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to examine temporal aspects of the personal experience of issues in health and well-being Towards a psychotherapy publishing ethics concordat Reading with love: Developing therapeutic imagination through purposeful engagement with qualitative research Wished I’d been there: Reflections on the special issue’s articles as refracted through my appreciations for qualitative researchers’ innovativeness Thematic analysis: A practical guide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1