Serum Methamphetamine Positivity in Trauma Patients Undergoing Surgery has No Negative Effect on Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality.

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-14 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_39_23
James Zhou, Adela Wu, Jingya Miao, Harminder Singh
{"title":"Serum Methamphetamine Positivity in Trauma Patients Undergoing Surgery has No Negative Effect on Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality.","authors":"James Zhou, Adela Wu, Jingya Miao, Harminder Singh","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_39_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The link between methamphetamine (METH) use and mortality or morbidity, particularly perioperative complications, associated with trauma surgery are not well characterized. This study aims to address this by performing a comparison of surgical outcomes between METH-negative (METH-) and METH-positive (METH+) trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective chart review was performed on all trauma patients admitted to our Level 1 trauma center who underwent surgical operations between 2015 and 2020. Patients were categorized into METH- and METH+ groups. Patient characteristics such as age, sex, race, Injury Severity Score (ISS), presence of peri-operative complications, and mortality, amongst others, were used to perform univariate comparisons. Additional multi-variate comparisons were performed across both the whole cohort and with age, sex, and ISS-matched groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 571 patients who met the final inclusion criteria, 421 were METH- and 150 METH+. The METH+ group also possessed a lower median ISS (<i>P</i> = 0.0478) and did not possess significantly different mortality or morbidity than their METH- counterparts in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis in whole-group and matched-group cohorts indicated that METH was not a positive predictor of mortality or morbidity. Instead, ISS predicted mortality (<i>P</i> = 0.048) and morbidity (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that METH use does not exert a positive effect on mortality or morbidity in the acute trauma surgery setting and that ISS may be a more significant contributor, suggesting severity, and etiology of injury are also important considerations for trauma surgery evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_39_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The link between methamphetamine (METH) use and mortality or morbidity, particularly perioperative complications, associated with trauma surgery are not well characterized. This study aims to address this by performing a comparison of surgical outcomes between METH-negative (METH-) and METH-positive (METH+) trauma patients.

Methods: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective chart review was performed on all trauma patients admitted to our Level 1 trauma center who underwent surgical operations between 2015 and 2020. Patients were categorized into METH- and METH+ groups. Patient characteristics such as age, sex, race, Injury Severity Score (ISS), presence of peri-operative complications, and mortality, amongst others, were used to perform univariate comparisons. Additional multi-variate comparisons were performed across both the whole cohort and with age, sex, and ISS-matched groups.

Results: Of 571 patients who met the final inclusion criteria, 421 were METH- and 150 METH+. The METH+ group also possessed a lower median ISS (P = 0.0478) and did not possess significantly different mortality or morbidity than their METH- counterparts in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis in whole-group and matched-group cohorts indicated that METH was not a positive predictor of mortality or morbidity. Instead, ISS predicted mortality (P = 0.048) and morbidity (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that METH use does not exert a positive effect on mortality or morbidity in the acute trauma surgery setting and that ISS may be a more significant contributor, suggesting severity, and etiology of injury are also important considerations for trauma surgery evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤手术患者血清甲基苯丙胺阳性对术后发病率和死亡率无负面影响。
简介:甲基苯丙胺(冰毒)的使用与创伤手术相关的死亡率或发病率,特别是围手术期并发症之间的联系尚未得到很好的表征。本研究旨在通过比较冰毒阴性(冰毒-)和冰毒阳性(冰毒+)创伤患者的手术结果来解决这一问题。方法:采用机构审查委员会批准的回顾性图表对2015年至2020年在我院一级创伤中心接受外科手术的所有创伤患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为甲基苯丙胺组和甲基苯丙胺+组。患者特征,如年龄、性别、种族、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、围手术期并发症的存在和死亡率等,被用于进行单变量比较。在整个队列以及年龄、性别和iss匹配组中进行了额外的多变量比较。结果:在571例符合最终纳入标准的患者中,421例为甲基安非他明,150例为甲基安非他明。在单变量分析中,甲基苯丙胺+组也具有较低的中位ISS (P = 0.0478),死亡率或发病率与甲基苯丙胺组相比没有显著差异。全组和匹配组队列的多变量分析表明,甲基苯丙胺不是死亡率或发病率的积极预测因子。相反,ISS预测死亡率(P = 0.048)和发病率(P < 0.001)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,甲基苯丙胺的使用对急性创伤手术的死亡率或发病率没有积极影响,ISS可能是一个更重要的因素,这表明损伤的严重程度和病因学也是创伤手术评估的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Case of Spastic Quadriplegia Remaining after Multiple Traumatic Injuries Complicated by Sepsis and Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome, as well as Delayed Multifocal Microbleeds. Acute Myocardial Infarction with Refractory Cardiogenic Shock after High-Voltage Electrocution: An Intriguing Case. Air Everywhere without Bowel Injury. Bed-up-head-elevated Position versus Supine Sniffing Position in Patients Undergoing Rapid Sequence Intubation Using Direct Laryngoscopy in the Emergency Department - A Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Acute Liver Injury in Sepsis Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1