Stocking rate effects on goats: A research observation.

M. Mellado, Raul Valdez, L. Lara, R. Lopez
{"title":"Stocking rate effects on goats: A research observation.","authors":"M. Mellado, Raul Valdez, L. Lara, R. Lopez","doi":"10.2458/AZU_JRM_V56I2_MELLADO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge on the ecological effects of goat grazing on arid rangeland is far from complete, and specifically there is little scientific information on effects of heavy goat grazing on arid ecosystems. One objective of this study was to determine botanical composition of dairy-type goat diets on heavily (1.5 ha per goat) and lightly (15 ha per goat) grazed Chihuahuan desert range by fecal microhistological analysis. A second objective was to determine whether vegetation cover, some blood metabolites and mineral levels, as well as fertility of goats were sensitive to high grazing pressure. The lightly grazed site had more (P < 0.05) total foliage cover (38.6 vs 30.4%) than the overstocked pasture. Total shrubs in diets of goats was greater (86.4 vs 72.4 in the late-dry period, 78.6 vs 42.1 in late-wet period; P < 0.05) on the heavily stocked pasture than the lightly stocked pasture. Forbs in the diets were lower (P < 0.10) in the late-dry (11.4 vs 21.5%), early-wet (55.4 vs 64.0%) and late-wet period (15.0 vs 45.8%) on the heavily stocked pasture than the lightly stocked pasture. Substantially lower (P < 0.01) serum glucose, urea nitrogen, Zn and Mg concentration at the onset of the breeding period in goats on the heavily stocked pasture, compared to goats on the lightly grazed pasture resulted in a higher (P < 0.01) abortion rate (22 vs 12%) and consequently a lower (P < 0.05) kidding rate (42 vs 55%). We concluded that overstocking with goats greatly reduced shrub and grass cover. Also, decades of continuously high grazing pressure has forced goats to alter diet selection pattern by consuming more resinous, toxic, and coarse species. This switch was associated with a lower nutritional status, a negative daily weight gain, lower body condition score in the late-wet period, and lower fertility on heavily grazed range.","PeriodicalId":16918,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Range Management","volume":"3 1","pages":"167-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Range Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/AZU_JRM_V56I2_MELLADO","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

Knowledge on the ecological effects of goat grazing on arid rangeland is far from complete, and specifically there is little scientific information on effects of heavy goat grazing on arid ecosystems. One objective of this study was to determine botanical composition of dairy-type goat diets on heavily (1.5 ha per goat) and lightly (15 ha per goat) grazed Chihuahuan desert range by fecal microhistological analysis. A second objective was to determine whether vegetation cover, some blood metabolites and mineral levels, as well as fertility of goats were sensitive to high grazing pressure. The lightly grazed site had more (P < 0.05) total foliage cover (38.6 vs 30.4%) than the overstocked pasture. Total shrubs in diets of goats was greater (86.4 vs 72.4 in the late-dry period, 78.6 vs 42.1 in late-wet period; P < 0.05) on the heavily stocked pasture than the lightly stocked pasture. Forbs in the diets were lower (P < 0.10) in the late-dry (11.4 vs 21.5%), early-wet (55.4 vs 64.0%) and late-wet period (15.0 vs 45.8%) on the heavily stocked pasture than the lightly stocked pasture. Substantially lower (P < 0.01) serum glucose, urea nitrogen, Zn and Mg concentration at the onset of the breeding period in goats on the heavily stocked pasture, compared to goats on the lightly grazed pasture resulted in a higher (P < 0.01) abortion rate (22 vs 12%) and consequently a lower (P < 0.05) kidding rate (42 vs 55%). We concluded that overstocking with goats greatly reduced shrub and grass cover. Also, decades of continuously high grazing pressure has forced goats to alter diet selection pattern by consuming more resinous, toxic, and coarse species. This switch was associated with a lower nutritional status, a negative daily weight gain, lower body condition score in the late-wet period, and lower fertility on heavily grazed range.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放养率对山羊影响的研究观察。
关于放牧山羊对干旱草原生态效应的认识还很不完整,特别是关于重度放牧山羊对干旱生态系统影响的科学信息很少。本研究的目的之一是通过粪便显微组织学分析,确定重度放牧(每只山羊1.5公顷)和轻度放牧(每只山羊15公顷)奇瓦瓦沙漠牧场乳型山羊日粮的植物成分。第二个目标是确定植被覆盖、一些血液代谢物和矿物质水平以及山羊的生育能力是否对高放牧压力敏感。轻度放牧地的总叶盖度(38.6% vs 30.4%)高于过度放牧地(P < 0.05)。山羊日粮中灌木总量较大(干后期为86.4比72.4,湿后期为78.6比42.1);P < 0.05)。重度放牧区干后期(11.4比21.5%)、湿早期(55.4比64.0%)和湿后期(15.0比45.8%)饲粮中脂肪含量均低于轻度放牧区(P < 0.10)。重度放牧区山羊繁殖初期血清葡萄糖、尿素氮、Zn和Mg浓度显著低于轻度放牧区山羊(P < 0.01),导致流产率(22% vs 12%)升高(P < 0.01),打胎率(42% vs 55%)降低(P < 0.05)。我们得出结论,山羊的过度放养大大减少了灌木和草地的覆盖。此外,几十年来持续的高放牧压力迫使山羊改变饮食选择模式,食用更多的树脂、有毒和粗糙的物种。这种转换与较低的营养状况、负的每日体重增加、湿后期较低的身体状况评分以及在重度放牧范围内较低的生育力有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Grasses and Grassland Farming The Study of Plant Communities: An Introduction to Plant Ecology Research observation: Daily movement patterns of hill climbing and bottom dwelling cowsfull access The rangelands of the Sahel. Estimating Cattle Gains from Consumption of Digestible Forage on Ponderosa Pine Range (La Estimacion de Ganancias del Ganado Bovino por el Consumo de Forraje Digestible)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1