A determination of the standards of morphometrics variables of the stomatognathic system of a fetus

Samra Salaga-Nefic, S. Mehmedbasić, Jasmina Kozadra, A. Zukanović, A. Tiro, V. Džemidžić, E. Nakaš
{"title":"A determination of the standards of morphometrics variables of the stomatognathic system of a fetus","authors":"Samra Salaga-Nefic, S. Mehmedbasić, Jasmina Kozadra, A. Zukanović, A. Tiro, V. Džemidžić, E. Nakaš","doi":"10.5937/SEJODR6-21665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Many factors affect the growth and development of the mandible. The most common one is micrognathia; this can pose and neonatal emergency. Early recognition of mandibular and other face anomalies could provide immediate care for these infants, and presence of neonatologist or other doctors in the delivery room. The aim: Aim of this study was to develop normal ranges of the facial markers: mandibular length, jaw index and the facial angle in the fetus using 3D ultrasound. Material and methods: The research was conducted as a cross-sectional study in the second trimester of pregnancy. Fetuses (female n=23 and male n=27) from singleton pregnancy between 29-37 week of gestation were examined by ultrasound. All images were acquired transabdominally, using Voluson E16. Ultrasound was performed by an experienced operator (SM) and measured the values of head circumference, abdominal circumference, biparietal diameter, femur length, body mass. For mandibular length, inferior facial angle, and the jaw index was calculated (Jaw Index =AP mandibular diameter / BPD * 100), the profile images were used (only images in the exact midsagittal plane were used). The characteristics of the fetal profiles were determined by the Schwartz and Ricketts profile analysis using soft tissue landmarks and analysis of the profile photographs. Results: The results show that the jaw index ranged from 25.33 and 34.06 with an average of 26.00 for all examined fetuses. Conclusion: The physiological position of the mandible is retrognathic and that the average physiological length of the mandible in the third trimester is 2.31cm. There is no difference in mandibular length between genders. Corresponding Author: Samra Salga-Nefic Rosenweg 2a, 3125 Toffen, Switzerland, e-mail: samrasalaga@gmail.com A determination of the standards of morphometrics variables of the stomatognathic system of a fetus INTRODUCTION Many factors affect the growth and development of the mandible: genes, irregular cell migration, low growth potential, feeding habits, and other habits acquired by newborns.1 The most common anomalies are microgenia (weak mandible growth) and retrogenia (small mandible growth in the sagittal plane).1 Deviation of physiological mandibular growth and development may incapacitate the essential functions of the stomatognathic system. Fetuses with mandible anomalies are at risk of airway obstruction through retro-positioning of the tongue-base into posterior pharyngeal airway.2 Micrognathia is frequently seen in Pierre Robin sequence, however it can be found in many genetic syndromes.3 Antenatal diagnosis of anomalies by ultrasound is widely used nowadays. The aim of this study was to develop normal ranges of the facial marker: mandibular length, jaw index and the facial angle in the fetus using 3D ultrasound. MATERIAL AND METHODS The research was conducted as a cross-sectional study in the second trimester of pregnancy. Fetuses (female n=23 and male n=27) from singleton pregnancy between 29-37 week of gestation were examined by ultrasound. All images were acquired transabdominally, using ultrasound Voluson E16, GE Healthcare, Austria GmbH & Co OG. Salaga-Nefic S., Mehmedbasic S., Kozadra J., Zukanovic A., Tiro, A., Dzemidzic, V., Nakas E. A determination of the standards of morphometrics variables of the stomatognathic system of a fetus. South Eur J Orthod Dentofac Res. 2019;6(1):6-11. Submitted: July 30, 2018; Revised: March 7, 2019; Published: April 30, 2019 6 South Eur J Orthod Dentofac Res Salaga-Nefic S. et al. Morphometrics variables of the fetus","PeriodicalId":22042,"journal":{"name":"South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/SEJODR6-21665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many factors affect the growth and development of the mandible. The most common one is micrognathia; this can pose and neonatal emergency. Early recognition of mandibular and other face anomalies could provide immediate care for these infants, and presence of neonatologist or other doctors in the delivery room. The aim: Aim of this study was to develop normal ranges of the facial markers: mandibular length, jaw index and the facial angle in the fetus using 3D ultrasound. Material and methods: The research was conducted as a cross-sectional study in the second trimester of pregnancy. Fetuses (female n=23 and male n=27) from singleton pregnancy between 29-37 week of gestation were examined by ultrasound. All images were acquired transabdominally, using Voluson E16. Ultrasound was performed by an experienced operator (SM) and measured the values of head circumference, abdominal circumference, biparietal diameter, femur length, body mass. For mandibular length, inferior facial angle, and the jaw index was calculated (Jaw Index =AP mandibular diameter / BPD * 100), the profile images were used (only images in the exact midsagittal plane were used). The characteristics of the fetal profiles were determined by the Schwartz and Ricketts profile analysis using soft tissue landmarks and analysis of the profile photographs. Results: The results show that the jaw index ranged from 25.33 and 34.06 with an average of 26.00 for all examined fetuses. Conclusion: The physiological position of the mandible is retrognathic and that the average physiological length of the mandible in the third trimester is 2.31cm. There is no difference in mandibular length between genders. Corresponding Author: Samra Salga-Nefic Rosenweg 2a, 3125 Toffen, Switzerland, e-mail: samrasalaga@gmail.com A determination of the standards of morphometrics variables of the stomatognathic system of a fetus INTRODUCTION Many factors affect the growth and development of the mandible: genes, irregular cell migration, low growth potential, feeding habits, and other habits acquired by newborns.1 The most common anomalies are microgenia (weak mandible growth) and retrogenia (small mandible growth in the sagittal plane).1 Deviation of physiological mandibular growth and development may incapacitate the essential functions of the stomatognathic system. Fetuses with mandible anomalies are at risk of airway obstruction through retro-positioning of the tongue-base into posterior pharyngeal airway.2 Micrognathia is frequently seen in Pierre Robin sequence, however it can be found in many genetic syndromes.3 Antenatal diagnosis of anomalies by ultrasound is widely used nowadays. The aim of this study was to develop normal ranges of the facial marker: mandibular length, jaw index and the facial angle in the fetus using 3D ultrasound. MATERIAL AND METHODS The research was conducted as a cross-sectional study in the second trimester of pregnancy. Fetuses (female n=23 and male n=27) from singleton pregnancy between 29-37 week of gestation were examined by ultrasound. All images were acquired transabdominally, using ultrasound Voluson E16, GE Healthcare, Austria GmbH & Co OG. Salaga-Nefic S., Mehmedbasic S., Kozadra J., Zukanovic A., Tiro, A., Dzemidzic, V., Nakas E. A determination of the standards of morphometrics variables of the stomatognathic system of a fetus. South Eur J Orthod Dentofac Res. 2019;6(1):6-11. Submitted: July 30, 2018; Revised: March 7, 2019; Published: April 30, 2019 6 South Eur J Orthod Dentofac Res Salaga-Nefic S. et al. Morphometrics variables of the fetus
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胎儿口颌系统形态计量学变量标准的确定
影响下颌骨生长发育的因素很多。最常见的是小颌;这可能造成新生儿的紧急情况。早期识别下颌骨和其他面部异常可以为这些婴儿提供即时护理,并有新生儿学家或其他医生在产房。目的:本研究的目的是利用三维超声确定胎儿的面部标志:下颌长度、下颌指数和面部角度的正常范围。材料与方法:本研究在妊娠中期进行横断面研究。对29 ~ 37周单胎妊娠的胎儿(女23例,男27例)进行超声检查。所有图像均经腹获取,使用Voluson E16。由经验丰富的操作员(SM)进行超声检查,测量头围、腹围、双顶骨直径、股骨长、体重。下颌长度、下面角、下颌指数计算(下颌指数=下颌AP直径/ BPD * 100),使用侧位图像(仅使用精确中矢状面图像)。胎儿轮廓的特征是由施瓦茨和里基茨轮廓分析确定,使用软组织地标和分析的轮廓照片。结果:所有胎儿的下颚指数在25.33 ~ 34.06之间,平均26.00。结论:下颌骨的生理位置为下颌后突,妊娠晚期下颌骨的平均生理长度为2.31cm。男女下颌骨长度无差异。通讯作者:Samra Salga-Nefic Rosenweg 2a, 3125 Toffen, Switzerland, e-mail: samrasalaga@gmail.com胎儿口颌系统形态测量变量标准的测定介绍影响下颌骨生长发育的因素很多:基因、不规则细胞迁移、低生长潜力、摄食习惯以及新生儿习得的其他习惯最常见的畸形是下颌小畸形(下颌骨生长弱)和下颌后畸形(矢状面下颌骨生长小)下颌骨生理性生长发育的偏差可能导致口颌系统的基本功能丧失。下颌骨异常的胎儿通过舌底后置进入咽后气道有气道阻塞的危险小颌畸形常见于皮埃尔·罗宾序列,但也见于许多遗传综合征超声在产前异常诊断中的应用越来越广泛。本研究的目的是利用三维超声技术建立胎儿面部标志的正常范围:下颌骨长度、下颌指数和面部角度。材料和方法本研究是在妊娠中期进行的横断面研究。对29 ~ 37周单胎妊娠的胎儿(女23例,男27例)进行超声检查。所有图像均经腹部获取,使用超声Voluson E16, GE Healthcare, Austria GmbH & Co OG。Salaga-Nefic S, Mehmedbasic S, Kozadra J, Zukanovic A, Tiro, A, Dzemidzic, V., Nakas E. A胎儿口颌系统形态计量学变量标准的测定。中华口腔正畸杂志,2019;6(1):6-11。提交时间:2018年7月30日;修订日期:2019年3月7日;6 South Eur J Orthod dentoface Res Salaga-Nefic S.等。胎儿形态计量学变量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Skeletal effects of mini-implant assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) on the sagittal dimensions of the maxilla an in-vivo cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study Management of Class II Division 1 Subdivision malocclusion using unilateral bicuspid extractions and fixed functional appliance: A Two Year Follow-Up Herbst Appliance palatally anchored in the treatment of dental class II malocclusion Bullying and malocclusion in adolescence: a case report Assessment of facial landmarks for bone asymmetry in geometric morphometric studies: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1