Leibniz vs. Transmigration: A Previously Unpublished Text from the Early 1700s

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Quaestiones Disputatae Pub Date : 2017-04-13 DOI:10.5840/QD2017728
L. Strickland
{"title":"Leibniz vs. Transmigration: A Previously Unpublished Text from the Early 1700s","authors":"L. Strickland","doi":"10.5840/QD2017728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I analyze a previously unpublished Leibniz text from the early 1700s. I give it the title \"On Unities and Transmigration\" since it contains an outline of his doctrine of unities and an examination of the doctrine of transmigration. The text is valuable because in it Leibniz considers three very specific versions of transmigration that he does not address elsewhere in his writings; these are (1) where a soul is released by the destruction of its body and is then free to pass into another body, (2) where souls are exchanged without any destruction of bodies, and (3) where human souls (minds) are exchanged, again without any destruction of bodies. I show that when tackling these three versions of transmigration in \"On Unities and Transmigration,\" Leibniz develops a series of objections that are not found anywhere else in his published writings, despite his lifelong opposition to the doctrine of transmigration. This paper is completed by two appendices, the first of which presents the previously unpublished \"On Unities and Transmigration\" text in full, in the original French (with all deletions indicated), while the second presents its English translation.","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD2017728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I analyze a previously unpublished Leibniz text from the early 1700s. I give it the title "On Unities and Transmigration" since it contains an outline of his doctrine of unities and an examination of the doctrine of transmigration. The text is valuable because in it Leibniz considers three very specific versions of transmigration that he does not address elsewhere in his writings; these are (1) where a soul is released by the destruction of its body and is then free to pass into another body, (2) where souls are exchanged without any destruction of bodies, and (3) where human souls (minds) are exchanged, again without any destruction of bodies. I show that when tackling these three versions of transmigration in "On Unities and Transmigration," Leibniz develops a series of objections that are not found anywhere else in his published writings, despite his lifelong opposition to the doctrine of transmigration. This paper is completed by two appendices, the first of which presents the previously unpublished "On Unities and Transmigration" text in full, in the original French (with all deletions indicated), while the second presents its English translation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莱布尼茨与轮回:18世纪早期未发表的文本
在本文中,我分析了18世纪早期莱布尼茨以前未发表的文本。我把它命名为“论统一性与轮回”,因为它包含了他的统一性学说的大纲和对轮回学说的考察。这篇文章很有价值,因为莱布尼茨在其中考虑了三个非常具体的轮回版本,这是他在其他著作中没有提到的;这些是(1)一个灵魂通过毁灭它的身体而得到释放,然后自由地进入另一个身体,(2)灵魂交换而不破坏身体,(3)人类灵魂(思想)交换,同样不破坏身体。我在《论统一与轮回》中指出,莱布尼茨在处理轮回的这三个版本时,提出了一系列反对意见,这在他发表的其他著作中是找不到的,尽管他一生都反对轮回学说。本文由两个附录完成,第一个附录完整地呈现了以前未发表的“论统一与转世”文本,以法语原文(所有删除都已注明),而第二个附录则呈现了其英文翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quaestiones Disputatae
Quaestiones Disputatae HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Remnants of Substances: A Neo-Aristotelian Resolution of the Puzzles After Survivalism and Corruptionism: Separated Souls as Incomplete Persons Evaluating Hylomorphism as a Hybrid Account of Personal Identity Editor’s Introduction Saint Thomas Aquinas and the Too-Many-Thinkers Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1