Comparison of Covid-19 IgG Anti-Spike Antibody Titer after Vaccination with Sputnik V in Seropositive and Naïve Vaccinees

Hajra Farooq
{"title":"Comparison of Covid-19 IgG Anti-Spike Antibody Titer after Vaccination with Sputnik V in Seropositive and Naïve Vaccinees","authors":"Hajra Farooq","doi":"10.47489/pszmc-815354-1-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 has shown to reduce the risk of having a severe infection and initiate a good degree of disease protection. Studies assessing the antibody titer after vaccination can be very helpful to see whether previously infected individuals have better immunological response as compared to uninfected or antibody naïve individuals. Aims & Objectives: Comparison of Anti-spike IgG antibody among vaccinees with or without previous exposure to COVID-19. To determine whether single dose regimen can produce significant antibody titer amongst previously infected cases and design vaccine dosage regimens accordingly. Place and duration of study: This study was conducted at Chughtai Institute of Pathology from April 2021 to June 2021. Material & Methods: Blood samples were collected from 83 adult male and female vaccinees at baseline, 3 weeks after the first dose and finally 7 days after the second dose. Previously infected individuals’ record was noted separately. Samples were immediately analyzed using Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II quant two step immunoassay. Data was analyzed using SPSS 23.0. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.Results: Majority of the candidates (57 %) were females and on analysis it was found that 42% of the patients were seropositive whereas 58% of the patients were antibody naïve before receiving the first dose of vaccine. There was a significant difference between mean antibody titer of seropositive and seronegative study participants at day 0, day 21 and finally on day 28 (p value <0.001) with seropositive individuals having higher antibody titers even after first vaccine shot. Conclusion: Post vaccination immunological response was higher in seropositive individuals as compared to the antibody naïve and this finding can help the policy makers to design a single dose vaccine regimen for the former category.","PeriodicalId":20500,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Shaikh Zayed Medical Complex Lahore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47489/pszmc-815354-1-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 has shown to reduce the risk of having a severe infection and initiate a good degree of disease protection. Studies assessing the antibody titer after vaccination can be very helpful to see whether previously infected individuals have better immunological response as compared to uninfected or antibody naïve individuals. Aims & Objectives: Comparison of Anti-spike IgG antibody among vaccinees with or without previous exposure to COVID-19. To determine whether single dose regimen can produce significant antibody titer amongst previously infected cases and design vaccine dosage regimens accordingly. Place and duration of study: This study was conducted at Chughtai Institute of Pathology from April 2021 to June 2021. Material & Methods: Blood samples were collected from 83 adult male and female vaccinees at baseline, 3 weeks after the first dose and finally 7 days after the second dose. Previously infected individuals’ record was noted separately. Samples were immediately analyzed using Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II quant two step immunoassay. Data was analyzed using SPSS 23.0. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.Results: Majority of the candidates (57 %) were females and on analysis it was found that 42% of the patients were seropositive whereas 58% of the patients were antibody naïve before receiving the first dose of vaccine. There was a significant difference between mean antibody titer of seropositive and seronegative study participants at day 0, day 21 and finally on day 28 (p value <0.001) with seropositive individuals having higher antibody titers even after first vaccine shot. Conclusion: Post vaccination immunological response was higher in seropositive individuals as compared to the antibody naïve and this finding can help the policy makers to design a single dose vaccine regimen for the former category.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清阳性和Naïve疫苗接种者接种Sputnik V后Covid-19 IgG抗刺突抗体滴度的比较
对SARS-CoV-2的免疫已被证明可以降低严重感染的风险,并启动良好的疾病保护。评估疫苗接种后抗体滴度的研究可以非常有助于了解先前感染的个体与未感染或抗体naïve个体相比是否具有更好的免疫反应。目的:比较有或没有接触过COVID-19的疫苗接种者的抗刺突IgG抗体。确定单剂量方案是否能在既往感染病例中产生显著的抗体滴度,并据此设计疫苗剂量方案。研究地点和时间:本研究于2021年4月至2021年6月在中台病理研究所进行。材料与方法:83名成年男性和女性接种者在基线、第一次接种后3周和第二次接种后7天采集血液样本。以前感染的个人记录被单独记录。立即使用雅培SARS-CoV-2 IgG II定量两步免疫分析法对样品进行分析。数据采用SPSS 23.0进行分析。p值<0.05为显著性。结果:大多数候选人(57%)是女性,分析发现42%的患者在接受第一剂疫苗前血清阳性,58%的患者抗体naïve。血清阳性和血清阴性研究参与者在第0天、第21天和最后在第28天的平均抗体滴度之间存在显著差异(p值<0.001),血清阳性个体即使在第一次接种疫苗后抗体滴度也较高。结论:与抗体naïve相比,血清阳性个体接种疫苗后的免疫反应更高,这一发现有助于决策者为前一类人群设计单剂量疫苗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anemia and the Factors Associated with it in Pregnant Women Attending Al-Sabeen Maternal and Child Hospital in Sana’a, Yemen Does Short Term Atorvastatin Treatment Improve Symptomatic Control in Patients with Mild to Moderate & Uncontrolled Asthma? Perception, Attitude & Barriers Amongst Dentists Using Digital and Electronic Technology Faculty Perception about E-Learning and Teaching Anatomy: An Experience of COVID 19 Pandemic Anti-Ulcerogenic Evaluation of Torilis Leptophylla Plant Extract on Indomethacin Induced Mice Gastric Ulcer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1