Moving beyond teaching excellence

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Comparative Education and Development Pub Date : 2019-01-07 DOI:10.1108/IJCED-08-2018-0028
P. Wood, M. O’Leary
{"title":"Moving beyond teaching excellence","authors":"P. Wood, M. O’Leary","doi":"10.1108/IJCED-08-2018-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nTeaching excellence remains a contested term in English higher education (HE). This paper begins by reflecting on its complex and sometimes blurred meaning, charting the divergence between academic interests in the complexity and contextual questions relating to practice development and organisational and sectoral shifts which have been driven by managerialism, accountability and “top-down” ideas of change. The authors argue that this divergence, epitomised in the development of the teaching excellence framework, has led to a confused, if ubiquitous, use of excellence to identify organisational and sector-led ideas of what it means to deliver quality teaching. However, these frameworks have become progressively detached from the complexity of practice investigated by those interested in pedagogy. The paper aims to discuss this issue.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis is a conceptual paper which brings together literature from teaching excellence, organisational science, time and HE to develop an alternative approach to pedagogic development.\n\n\nFindings\nBased on a critique of the current, confused conceptualisation of teaching excellence, the authors offer a different narrative which demonstrates how a reconsideration of the factors is important in developing critical and challenging teaching opportunities. Based on a “bottom-up” system focusing on dialogue, sustainability and “unhasty” time, the authors argue for a re-establishing of a holistic approach in HE providers based on emergent pedagogies as opposed to teaching excellence.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper demonstrates why teaching excellence has become conceptually fractured in an English context, and why a new approach to pedagogic development needs to be considered to establish a more positive and critical approach at both the institutional and sectoral levels. This paper outlines a possible approach to developing such renewal.\n","PeriodicalId":51967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-08-2018-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose Teaching excellence remains a contested term in English higher education (HE). This paper begins by reflecting on its complex and sometimes blurred meaning, charting the divergence between academic interests in the complexity and contextual questions relating to practice development and organisational and sectoral shifts which have been driven by managerialism, accountability and “top-down” ideas of change. The authors argue that this divergence, epitomised in the development of the teaching excellence framework, has led to a confused, if ubiquitous, use of excellence to identify organisational and sector-led ideas of what it means to deliver quality teaching. However, these frameworks have become progressively detached from the complexity of practice investigated by those interested in pedagogy. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual paper which brings together literature from teaching excellence, organisational science, time and HE to develop an alternative approach to pedagogic development. Findings Based on a critique of the current, confused conceptualisation of teaching excellence, the authors offer a different narrative which demonstrates how a reconsideration of the factors is important in developing critical and challenging teaching opportunities. Based on a “bottom-up” system focusing on dialogue, sustainability and “unhasty” time, the authors argue for a re-establishing of a holistic approach in HE providers based on emergent pedagogies as opposed to teaching excellence. Originality/value This paper demonstrates why teaching excellence has become conceptually fractured in an English context, and why a new approach to pedagogic development needs to be considered to establish a more positive and critical approach at both the institutional and sectoral levels. This paper outlines a possible approach to developing such renewal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越卓越教学
教学卓越在英国高等教育(HE)中一直是一个有争议的术语。本文首先反思其复杂且有时模糊的含义,绘制了与实践发展和组织和部门转变有关的复杂性和背景问题的学术兴趣之间的分歧,这些变化是由管理主义、问责制和“自上而下”的变革思想驱动的。作者认为,这种分歧集中体现在卓越教学框架的发展中,导致了一种混乱的(如果普遍存在的话)使用卓越来识别组织和部门主导的关于提供高质量教学意味着什么的想法。然而,这些框架已经逐渐脱离了那些对教育学感兴趣的人所调查的实践的复杂性。本文旨在对这一问题进行探讨。设计/方法/方法这是一篇概念性论文,汇集了卓越教学、组织科学、时间和高等教育方面的文献,以开发一种替代方法来促进教学发展。基于对当前混乱的卓越教学概念的批评,作者提供了一个不同的叙述,说明重新考虑这些因素对于开发关键和具有挑战性的教学机会是多么重要。基于关注对话、可持续性和“不仓促”时间的“自下而上”系统,作者主张在高等教育提供者中重新建立一种基于新兴教学法而不是卓越教学的整体方法。原创性/价值这篇论文论证了为什么卓越的教学在英语语境中已经在概念上断裂了,以及为什么需要考虑一种新的教学发展方法,以便在机构和部门层面上建立一种更积极、更批判性的方法。本文概述了发展这种更新的可能途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
A critical evaluation of the validity of socioeconomic measures used in PISA Envisioning quality education for sustainability transformation in teacher education: perspectives from an international dialogue on Sustainable Development Goal 4 Vedic mathematics for sustainable knowledge: a systematic literature review Educational aspirations of school adolescents in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: how are these aspirations shaped? Reasonable adjustment for inclusive development: a cautionary case study of Australian VET teachers’ experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1