JAKSA PENYIDIK DAN PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PIDANA KORUPSI MENURUT HUKUM ACARA PIDANA INDONESIA

Barhamudin Barhamudin, Abuyazid Bustomi
{"title":"JAKSA PENYIDIK DAN PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PIDANA KORUPSI MENURUT HUKUM ACARA PIDANA INDONESIA","authors":"Barhamudin Barhamudin, Abuyazid Bustomi","doi":"10.36546/solusi.v21i1.808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to determine the investigation process and the relationship between investigators and public prosecutors in the process of investigating criminal acts of corruption. This research is a normative legal research. By using secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials including tertiary legal materials. The Criminal Justice System outlined by the Criminal Procedure Code is an integrated criminal justice system (SPP), so the role of the prosecutor in addition to being a public prosecutor as well as an investigator is not in accordance with the principles of the integrated criminal justice system. Therefore, in an integrated criminal justice system, there is mutual supervision among the components of the criminal justice system, especially those related to investigation and prosecution. This can be seen from the existence of a pretrial hearing regulated in Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code.Eradication of criminal acts of corruption is influenced by the work of the integrated criminal justice system (SPPT), the prosecutor's office has divided the powers of investigation and prosecution, but in practice it is still unclear how the horizontal supervision will be in the event of dual powers of prosecutors, investigators and public prosecutors in corruption crimes.","PeriodicalId":52605,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Kursor Menuju Solusi Teknologi Informasi","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Kursor Menuju Solusi Teknologi Informasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v21i1.808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the investigation process and the relationship between investigators and public prosecutors in the process of investigating criminal acts of corruption. This research is a normative legal research. By using secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials including tertiary legal materials. The Criminal Justice System outlined by the Criminal Procedure Code is an integrated criminal justice system (SPP), so the role of the prosecutor in addition to being a public prosecutor as well as an investigator is not in accordance with the principles of the integrated criminal justice system. Therefore, in an integrated criminal justice system, there is mutual supervision among the components of the criminal justice system, especially those related to investigation and prosecution. This can be seen from the existence of a pretrial hearing regulated in Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code.Eradication of criminal acts of corruption is influenced by the work of the integrated criminal justice system (SPPT), the prosecutor's office has divided the powers of investigation and prosecution, but in practice it is still unclear how the horizontal supervision will be in the event of dual powers of prosecutors, investigators and public prosecutors in corruption crimes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据印尼刑法,检察官和检察官腐败罪
该研究的目的是确定调查过程以及调查腐败犯罪行为过程中调查人员与检察官之间的关系。本研究是一项规范性法律研究。通过使用第二手资料包括一手法律资料,第二手法律资料包括第三手法律资料。《刑事诉讼法》所规定的刑事司法制度是综合刑事司法制度(SPP),因此检察官除了检察官和调查员之外的作用不符合综合刑事司法制度的原则。因此,在一个综合的刑事司法系统中,刑事司法系统的组成部分之间存在相互监督,特别是与侦查和起诉有关的组成部分。这可以从《刑事诉讼法》第77条规定的审前听证会的存在中看出。根除腐败犯罪行为受到综合刑事司法制度工作的影响,检察机关对腐败犯罪进行了调查权和起诉权的划分,但在实践中,在检察官、调查人员和公诉人双重权力的情况下,如何对腐败犯罪进行横向监督尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
SANKSI HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU KEJAHATAN KEMANUSIAAN DI INDONESIA ASAS PRADUGA TAK BERSALAH DALAM PROSES PENYIDIKAN ISBAT NIKAH SUDUT PANDANG UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN PENDEKATAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DEBITOR DAN KREDITOR DALAM PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG KEPALITIAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN MEMBAYAR UTANG DIMASA MENDATANG REALISASI DEMOKRASI DAN KONSTITUSI DALAM UPAYA PENGUATAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DI INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1