An Experimental Study on Effect of Concrete Type on Bond Strength of GFRP Bars

A. Doostmohamadi, A. V. Oskouei, A. Kheyroddin
{"title":"An Experimental Study on Effect of Concrete Type on Bond Strength of GFRP Bars","authors":"A. Doostmohamadi, A. V. Oskouei, A. Kheyroddin","doi":"10.22075/JRCE.2020.19922.1392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the common methods to create bond strength in reinforced concrete is providing development length. The bond strength of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bar is inherently poor due to its shape, as well as its inadequate mechanical interlocking with concrete. Therefore, providing sufficient development length in this bar is different and more conservative in comparison with steel bars. In this study, three types of concrete are selected, namely normal-weight concrete (NWC), light-weight concrete (LWC), and light-weight fiber reinforced concrete (LFRC). In order to investigate the adequate development length required for GFRP bars and its relation with the concrete type and compressive strength, for Each type of concrete, two different mix designs which have various compressive strengths are considered. 18 cube specimens are fabricated and the direct pull-out test is performed. The results indicate that, in all types of concrete, as the compressive strength increases, the bond strength between concrete and rebar augments. In addition, assessing the bond strength of different types of concrete demonstrates that the use of LWC, due to its inherent weakness of aggregates interlocking, causes pre-mature cracks and loss of the bond strength compared to NWC. Furthermore, LFRC mixtures containing 0.3% and 0.5% macro-synthetic fiber volume fraction reveal that the presence of fibers can be effective in controlling cracks and increases the bond strength between GFRP bars and concrete. As a result, with the increase of the bond strength between the GFRP bar and the concrete, the ultimate capacity of the concrete cross-section augments.","PeriodicalId":52415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"52-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22075/JRCE.2020.19922.1392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

One of the common methods to create bond strength in reinforced concrete is providing development length. The bond strength of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bar is inherently poor due to its shape, as well as its inadequate mechanical interlocking with concrete. Therefore, providing sufficient development length in this bar is different and more conservative in comparison with steel bars. In this study, three types of concrete are selected, namely normal-weight concrete (NWC), light-weight concrete (LWC), and light-weight fiber reinforced concrete (LFRC). In order to investigate the adequate development length required for GFRP bars and its relation with the concrete type and compressive strength, for Each type of concrete, two different mix designs which have various compressive strengths are considered. 18 cube specimens are fabricated and the direct pull-out test is performed. The results indicate that, in all types of concrete, as the compressive strength increases, the bond strength between concrete and rebar augments. In addition, assessing the bond strength of different types of concrete demonstrates that the use of LWC, due to its inherent weakness of aggregates interlocking, causes pre-mature cracks and loss of the bond strength compared to NWC. Furthermore, LFRC mixtures containing 0.3% and 0.5% macro-synthetic fiber volume fraction reveal that the presence of fibers can be effective in controlling cracks and increases the bond strength between GFRP bars and concrete. As a result, with the increase of the bond strength between the GFRP bar and the concrete, the ultimate capacity of the concrete cross-section augments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混凝土类型对GFRP筋粘结强度影响的试验研究
提高钢筋混凝土粘结强度的常用方法之一是提供发展长度。由于玻璃纤维增强聚合物(GFRP)钢筋本身的形状和与混凝土的机械联锁不足,其粘结强度本来就很差。因此,在这种钢筋中提供足够的发展长度与钢筋相比是不同的,更为保守。在本研究中,我们选择了三种类型的混凝土,即中重混凝土(NWC)、轻质混凝土(LWC)和轻质纤维增强混凝土(LFRC)。为了研究GFRP筋所需的适当发展长度及其与混凝土类型和抗压强度的关系,对每种类型的混凝土,考虑了两种不同的抗压强度的配合比设计。制作了18个立方体试件,进行了直接拉拔试验。结果表明,在所有类型的混凝土中,随着抗压强度的增加,混凝土与钢筋之间的粘结强度增加。此外,评估不同类型混凝土的粘结强度表明,与NWC相比,LWC的使用由于其骨料联锁的固有弱点,导致了早熟裂缝和粘结强度的损失。此外,含有0.3%和0.5%宏合成纤维体积分数的LFRC混合料表明,纤维的存在可以有效地控制裂缝,提高GFRP筋与混凝土之间的粘结强度。因此,随着GFRP筋与混凝土粘结强度的增加,混凝土截面的极限承载力增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering
Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Damage Sensitive-Stories of RC and Steel Frames under Critical Mainshock-Aftershock Ground Motions Evaluation of Intermediate Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame subjected to Truck collision Damage Detection in Prestressed Concrete Slabs Using Wavelet Analysis of Vibration Responses in the Time Domain Rehabilitation of Corroded Reinforced Concrete Elements by Rebar Replacement Risk assessment and challenges faced in repairs and rehabilitation of dilapidated buildings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1