Blood pressure and its circadian pattern in obese and lean premenopausal women

Pub Date : 2020-03-30 DOI:10.5603/AH.A2020.0005
J. Silva-Nunes, M. Brito, L. Veiga
{"title":"Blood pressure and its circadian pattern in obese and lean premenopausal women","authors":"J. Silva-Nunes, M. Brito, L. Veiga","doi":"10.5603/AH.A2020.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Obesity is frequently referred to as an independent risk factor for high blood pressure and hypertension is very prevalent among obese people. The aims of this study were: to compare office-based and 24 h blood pressure (BP) and its circadian pattern between lean and obese women; to study correlations between BP, insulin resistance (IR) and markers of subclinical inflammation/early atherosclerosis. Material and methods. Eighty-eight lean and 107 otherwise healthy obese women were characterized for anthropometrics, BP (office-based determinations and 24 h ABPM) and for glucose, insulin, triglycerides, inteleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a), high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP), retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP-4), leptin, adiponectin, resistin, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), and vascular-cellular adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1). Insulin resistance was determined by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), and McAuley indexes (also Matsuda in obese). Results. Obese group presented higher office-based systolic/diastolic BP, systolic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), and more non-dippers. HOMA-IR and body fat was correlated to systolic (r2 = 0.176) and glucose to diastolic (p = 0.008; r = 0.256) ABPM. Age, QUICKI, and TNF-a was correlated with dipping (r2 = 0.172); adiponectin, age, BMI, and glucose to systolic (r2 = 0.226) and diastolic (r2 = 0.215) office-based BP. Concerning lean women, MCP-1 was associated with diastolic ABPM (p = 0.013; r = 0.267). Systolic office-based BP was associated with waist-to-hip ratio (p = 0.01; r = 0.273); this and RBP-4 was correlated with office-based diastolic BP (r2 = 0.12). Conclusion. Although relatively healthy, obese women present higher BP than lean. Anthropometrics, IR, and fasting glucose all influence BP in obesity; additionally, IR is involved in non-dipping. No strong correlation exists between BP/dipping and subclinical inflammation in either group of women.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/AH.A2020.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Obesity is frequently referred to as an independent risk factor for high blood pressure and hypertension is very prevalent among obese people. The aims of this study were: to compare office-based and 24 h blood pressure (BP) and its circadian pattern between lean and obese women; to study correlations between BP, insulin resistance (IR) and markers of subclinical inflammation/early atherosclerosis. Material and methods. Eighty-eight lean and 107 otherwise healthy obese women were characterized for anthropometrics, BP (office-based determinations and 24 h ABPM) and for glucose, insulin, triglycerides, inteleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a), high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP), retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP-4), leptin, adiponectin, resistin, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), and vascular-cellular adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1). Insulin resistance was determined by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), and McAuley indexes (also Matsuda in obese). Results. Obese group presented higher office-based systolic/diastolic BP, systolic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), and more non-dippers. HOMA-IR and body fat was correlated to systolic (r2 = 0.176) and glucose to diastolic (p = 0.008; r = 0.256) ABPM. Age, QUICKI, and TNF-a was correlated with dipping (r2 = 0.172); adiponectin, age, BMI, and glucose to systolic (r2 = 0.226) and diastolic (r2 = 0.215) office-based BP. Concerning lean women, MCP-1 was associated with diastolic ABPM (p = 0.013; r = 0.267). Systolic office-based BP was associated with waist-to-hip ratio (p = 0.01; r = 0.273); this and RBP-4 was correlated with office-based diastolic BP (r2 = 0.12). Conclusion. Although relatively healthy, obese women present higher BP than lean. Anthropometrics, IR, and fasting glucose all influence BP in obesity; additionally, IR is involved in non-dipping. No strong correlation exists between BP/dipping and subclinical inflammation in either group of women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
肥胖和消瘦绝经前妇女的血压及其昼夜节律模式
背景。肥胖通常被认为是高血压的独立危险因素,而高血压在肥胖人群中非常普遍。本研究的目的是:比较瘦和肥胖女性的办公室血压和24小时血压(BP)及其昼夜节律模式;研究血压、胰岛素抵抗(IR)与亚临床炎症/早期动脉粥样硬化标志物的相关性。材料和方法。研究人员对88名苗条女性和107名健康肥胖女性进行了人体测量、血压(办公室检测和24小时ABPM)、葡萄糖、胰岛素、甘油三酯、白细胞介素6 (IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子α (TNF-a)、高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、视黄醇结合蛋白4 (RBP-4)、瘦素、脂联素、抵抗素、单核细胞趋化蛋白1 (MCP-1)、细胞间粘附分子1 (ICAM-1)和血管细胞粘附分子1 (VCAM-1)的检测。胰岛素抵抗通过胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)、定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI)和McAuley指数(肥胖患者也采用Matsuda指数)确定。结果。肥胖组出现较高的办公室收缩压/舒张压,收缩压动态监测(ABPM)和更多的非dip。HOMA-IR和体脂与收缩压相关(r2 = 0.176),葡萄糖与舒张压相关(p = 0.008;r = 0.256)。年龄、QUICKI、TNF-a与浸润相关(r2 = 0.172);脂联素、年龄、BMI和葡萄糖与收缩压(r2 = 0.226)和舒张压(r2 = 0.215)的比值。在瘦弱女性中,MCP-1与舒张期ABPM相关(p = 0.013;R = 0.267)。收缩期血压与腰臀比相关(p = 0.01;R = 0.273);RBP-4与办公室舒张压相关(r2 = 0.12)。结论。尽管相对健康,肥胖女性的血压高于瘦女性。人体测量、IR和空腹血糖都影响肥胖患者的血压;此外,IR还参与了不浸渍。在两组女性中,血压/下降与亚临床炎症之间没有很强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1