Psychologists’ diagnostic assessments of adults with dyslexia: an Australian-based survey study

IF 2.2 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Educational and Developmental Psychologist Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.1080/20590776.2021.2011202
A. Sadusky, Nerelie C. Freeman, E. Berger, A. Reupert
{"title":"Psychologists’ diagnostic assessments of adults with dyslexia: an Australian-based survey study","authors":"A. Sadusky, Nerelie C. Freeman, E. Berger, A. Reupert","doi":"10.1080/20590776.2021.2011202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective This study explored how psychologists in Australia assess and diagnose adults with dyslexia. Psychologists’ understandings about dyslexia were recorded alongside the tools used for diagnosing adults with dyslexia (and how these differ from practices with young people). Training experiences and influential factors on diagnostic decision-making in assessing adults for dyslexia were identified. Method An online survey, based on the study aims, was distributed to various professional associations. Participants were 32 registered psychologists in Australia who had assessed adults for dyslexia. Survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric analyses. Results Most participants reported: (1) that dyslexia is attributable to deficits in phonological processing and rapid automatized naming, (2) assessing adults for dyslexia involves the administration of Wechsler cognitive and achievement tests, (3) familiarity with test tools, diagnostic criteria, and clinical judgement informed adult-focused dyslexia assessment practices, (4) adults and children are assessed for dyslexia in similar ways, and (5) there is little post-registration training specific to assessing adults for dyslexia. Conclusions Psychologists extrapolated child-focused dyslexia assessment practices to adults. This may result in a missed dyslexia diagnosis and/or expending unnecessary resources on assessment. There is a need for increased training in developmentally-sensitive methods for assessing adults for dyslexia.","PeriodicalId":44410,"journal":{"name":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational and Developmental Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2021.2011202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective This study explored how psychologists in Australia assess and diagnose adults with dyslexia. Psychologists’ understandings about dyslexia were recorded alongside the tools used for diagnosing adults with dyslexia (and how these differ from practices with young people). Training experiences and influential factors on diagnostic decision-making in assessing adults for dyslexia were identified. Method An online survey, based on the study aims, was distributed to various professional associations. Participants were 32 registered psychologists in Australia who had assessed adults for dyslexia. Survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric analyses. Results Most participants reported: (1) that dyslexia is attributable to deficits in phonological processing and rapid automatized naming, (2) assessing adults for dyslexia involves the administration of Wechsler cognitive and achievement tests, (3) familiarity with test tools, diagnostic criteria, and clinical judgement informed adult-focused dyslexia assessment practices, (4) adults and children are assessed for dyslexia in similar ways, and (5) there is little post-registration training specific to assessing adults for dyslexia. Conclusions Psychologists extrapolated child-focused dyslexia assessment practices to adults. This may result in a missed dyslexia diagnosis and/or expending unnecessary resources on assessment. There is a need for increased training in developmentally-sensitive methods for assessing adults for dyslexia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理学家对成人阅读障碍的诊断评估:一项基于澳大利亚的调查研究
摘要目的本研究探讨澳大利亚心理学家如何评估和诊断成人阅读障碍。心理学家对阅读障碍的理解与用于诊断成人阅读障碍的工具一起被记录下来(以及这些与年轻人的做法有何不同)。探讨成人阅读障碍诊断决策的培训经验及影响因素。方法根据研究目的,对各专业协会进行在线调查。参与者是澳大利亚的32名注册心理学家,他们对成年人的阅读障碍进行了评估。使用描述性统计和非参数分析对调查结果进行分析。大多数参与者报告:(1)阅读障碍可归因于语音处理和快速自动命名的缺陷;(2)评估成人阅读障碍涉及韦氏认知和成就测试的管理;(3)熟悉测试工具、诊断标准和临床判断,以成人为中心的阅读障碍评估实践;(4)成人和儿童的阅读障碍评估方法相似。(5)注册后专门评估成人阅读障碍的培训很少。结论:心理学家推断以儿童为中心的阅读障碍评估方法适用于成人。这可能导致错过阅读障碍的诊断和/或在评估上花费不必要的资源。有必要增加对发育敏感方法的培训,以评估成人的阅读障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational and Developmental Psychologist
Educational and Developmental Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Published biannually, this quality, peer-reviewed journal publishes psychological research that makes a substantial contribution to the knowledge and practice of education and developmental psychology. The broad aims are to provide a vehicle for dissemination of research that is of national and international significance to the researchers, practitioners and students of educational and developmental psychology.
期刊最新文献
Best practice in psychoeducational assessment: beyond the manual Parental involvement in school and quality of life: a longitudinal study with Portuguese parents during the COVID-19 pandemic period Parental experience and distress: the protective role of self-care and employment flexibility on parenting practices in parents of adolescents An adaptation of the KidCOPE: the KidCOPE-parent (KidCOPE-P) – a parent-report measure of child coping strategies Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Bullying and Cyberbullying Scale for Adolescents (BCS-A) in Iranian students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1