“Exactly engrav’d by Tho

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 0 MUSIC JOURNAL OF MUSICOLOGY Pub Date : 2020-07-10 DOI:10.1525/JM.2020.37.3.305
Rebecca Herissone
{"title":"“Exactly engrav’d by Tho","authors":"Rebecca Herissone","doi":"10.1525/JM.2020.37.3.305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomas Cross Jr. was the first music printer to capitalize on the growth of public musical performances in late seventeenth-century England by producing cheap, single-sheet editions of the newest and most popular songs, especially those from the latest theater productions, for audience members and others in fashionable society to buy. As England’s first specialist music engraver, he was able to produce his simple prints of individual songs unusually quickly and to sell them at a fraction of the price of the larger movable-type anthologies that remained the mainstay of established London music stationers in this period. In the absence of intellectual property laws, Cross was free to print any music he could acquire, and he soon came to be seen as a threat by composers and music stationers alike. He clearly did not enjoy good relationships with contemporary composers, and we can safely assume that they did not supply him with his source materials. Given that his prints were nearly always the first published editions of the theater songs to appear in print, how did he obtain his musical texts? This article examines the hypothesis that Cross’s engravings may have derived directly from the stage performances of the singers he names in the titles of his editions, and that they may reflect the singers’ interpretations of the music “exactly engrav’d,” as Cross claimed. Comparison of the variants in Cross’s editions with readings preserved in sources that have known connections to contemporary performance demonstrates that his prints—despite their not undeserved reputation for inaccuracy—probably preserve contemporary performing practices more closely than has hitherto been acknowledged. Their significance as sources thus needs to be reevaluated, which raises broader questions about the criteria that scholars use when making judgments about the relative authority of sources from this period.","PeriodicalId":44168,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MUSICOLOGY","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MUSICOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/JM.2020.37.3.305","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Thomas Cross Jr. was the first music printer to capitalize on the growth of public musical performances in late seventeenth-century England by producing cheap, single-sheet editions of the newest and most popular songs, especially those from the latest theater productions, for audience members and others in fashionable society to buy. As England’s first specialist music engraver, he was able to produce his simple prints of individual songs unusually quickly and to sell them at a fraction of the price of the larger movable-type anthologies that remained the mainstay of established London music stationers in this period. In the absence of intellectual property laws, Cross was free to print any music he could acquire, and he soon came to be seen as a threat by composers and music stationers alike. He clearly did not enjoy good relationships with contemporary composers, and we can safely assume that they did not supply him with his source materials. Given that his prints were nearly always the first published editions of the theater songs to appear in print, how did he obtain his musical texts? This article examines the hypothesis that Cross’s engravings may have derived directly from the stage performances of the singers he names in the titles of his editions, and that they may reflect the singers’ interpretations of the music “exactly engrav’d,” as Cross claimed. Comparison of the variants in Cross’s editions with readings preserved in sources that have known connections to contemporary performance demonstrates that his prints—despite their not undeserved reputation for inaccuracy—probably preserve contemporary performing practices more closely than has hitherto been acknowledged. Their significance as sources thus needs to be reevaluated, which raises broader questions about the criteria that scholars use when making judgments about the relative authority of sources from this period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一字不差地刻着
小托马斯·克罗斯是第一个利用17世纪后期英国公共音乐表演增长的音乐印刷商,他生产廉价的、单页的最新和最流行的歌曲,特别是那些来自最新戏剧作品的歌曲,供观众和时尚社会的其他人购买。作为英国第一个专业的音乐雕刻师,他能够以异常快的速度制作出个人歌曲的简单版画,并以比大型活字选集更低的价格出售,而大型活字选集在这一时期仍是伦敦老牌音乐文具商的主要产品。在没有知识产权法的情况下,克罗斯可以自由地印刷他所能获得的任何音乐,他很快就被作曲家和音乐文具商视为威胁。很明显,他与同时代的作曲家关系不太好,我们可以有把握地假设,他们没有为他提供原始材料。考虑到他的版画几乎总是最先出版的戏剧歌曲,他是如何获得他的音乐文本的呢?本文检验了这样一种假设,即克罗斯的版画可能直接来源于他在版本标题中命名的歌手的舞台表演,并且它们可能反映了歌手对“精确雕刻”的音乐的解释,正如克罗斯所说的那样。将克罗斯版本的变体与已知与当代表演有联系的资料中保存的阅读材料进行比较,可以发现他的版画——尽管它们因不准确而名声不佳——可能比迄今为止公认的更密切地保留了当代表演实践。因此,它们作为资料来源的重要性需要重新评估,这就引发了更广泛的问题,即学者们在判断这一时期资料来源的相对权威时所使用的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The widely-respected Journal of Musicology enters its third decade as one of few comprehensive peer-reviewed journals in the discipline, offering articles in every period, field and methodology of musicological scholarship. Its contributors range from senior scholars to new voices in the field. Its reach is international, with recent articles by authors from North America, Europe and Australia, and circulation to individuals and libraries throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
Heroic Artists, Critical Abuse, and the Death of Maria Malibran From Milton to Hamilton and Handel Sonny Rollins’s Musical Thought Constructing a Versatile Virtuoso Persona Instrument or Appliance? The RCA Theremin, Gender, Labor, and Domesticity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1